MAGNA-TILES vs Melissa & Doug:Which is more popular?
In September 2026, MAGNA-TILES had more branded searches than Melissa & Doug among toy brands worldwide. MAGNA-TILES had about 246,000 branded searches, while Melissa & Doug had 135,000. MAGNA-TILES made up 1.6% of all toy brand searches we track, and Melissa & Doug accounted for 0.91%. When we asked ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews about toy brands, Melissa & Doug appeared in all four answers and MAGNA-TILES in two. Melissa & Doug was mentioned before MAGNA-TILES in every answer.
Who do people search for more?
MAGNA-TILES, about 82% more searches than Melissa & Doug
Who does AI mention more?
Melissa & Doug, mentioned in every answer we collected
Who does AI recommend more?
Melissa & Doug, named ahead of MAGNA-TILES in every answer
Follow MAGNA-TILES vs Melissa & Doug and get free monthly updates on what changed
By continuing you'll get index updates and occasional product news from Brandwave. Unsubscribe any time. Privacy
Top toy brands in ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews
In three ChatGPT questions and one Google AI Overview, Melissa & Doug appeared in all four answers. MAGNA-TILES was mentioned in two out of four: in one of the three ChatGPT answers and in the Google AI Overview. Melissa & Doug was listed before MAGNA-TILES in every answer.
Most recommended by AI
Brands get a higher ranking if they are mentioned earlier in the answers.
Melissa & Doug1st
LEGO2nd
Fisher-Price3rd
Playmobil4th
MAGNA-TILES5th
Learning Resources6th
Hape7th
Barbie8th
Hasbro9th
VTech–- +1 more
Mentioned by AI
Each dot is one answer, filled in when that answer mentions the brand.
Melissa & Doug4 of 4Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 1 Google answers
LEGO3 of 4Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 1 Google answers
Fisher-Price3 of 4Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 1 Google answers
Playmobil2 of 4Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 1 Google answers
MAGNA-TILES2 of 4Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 1 Google answers
Hape2 of 4Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 1 Google answers
Learning Resources2 of 4Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 1 Google answers
Barbie1 of 4Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 1 Google answers
Hasbro1 of 4Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 1 Google answers
VTech0 of 4Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 1 Google answers
See every answer about toy brands
4 answers
Asked ChatGPT
“Which toy brand should I buy?”
Asked ChatGPT
“What are the best toy brands?”
Asked ChatGPT
“What's the best toy brand for young children?”
Searched Google, AI Overview
“toy brands”
Google showed no AI Overview for this search.
Searched Google, AI Overview
“educational toy brand”
Not named in any answer:
Brands are shown in the order each answer named them. The survey took place in the United States on October 19, 2026.
Is MAGNA-TILES or Melissa & Doug more popular in search?
This chart shows how often people search Google for MAGNA-TILES and Melissa & Doug by name. Each line represents a brand's share of searches for all 11 toy brands we track, month by month, from English-language searches worldwide.
Share of searches by month for MAGNA-TILES, Melissa & Doug. The figures are in the table below the chart.
View monthly share of searches table
| Month | LEGO | Barbie | Playmobil | VTech | Fisher-Price | MAGNA-TILES | Hasbro | Melissa & Doug | Spin Master | Hape | Learning Resources |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 2025 | 70.5% | 14.2% | 6.4% | 2.2% | 1.9% | 1.9% | 1.3% | 0.86% | 0.38% | 0.31% | 0.05% |
| Nov 2025 | 74.3% | 10% | 6.7% | 1.8% | 2% | 2.5% | 0.9% | 1.1% | 0.27% | 0.27% | 0.08% |
| Dec 2025 | 76.7% | 10.3% | 5.6% | 1.5% | 1.7% | 2.1% | 0.76% | 0.76% | 0.28% | 0.23% | 0.05% |
| Jan 2026 | 79.3% | 10.7% | 3.9% | 1.4% | 1.4% | 1.2% | 0.96% | 0.53% | 0.29% | 0.24% | 0.03% |
| Feb 2026 | 74.9% | 12.3% | 5.6% | 1.6% | 1.4% | 1.7% | 1.4% | 0.61% | 0.33% | 0.27% | 0.08% |
| Mar 2026 | 72.5% | 14.6% | 5.4% | 1.6% | 1.6% | 1.6% | 1.3% | 0.72% | 0.32% | 0.32% | 0.04% |
| Apr 2026 | 72.8% | 14.7% | 5.4% | 1.6% | 1.6% | 1.3% | 1.3% | 0.6% | 0.32% | 0.32% | 0.04% |
| May 2026 | 75.6% | 12.5% | 4.6% | 1.7% | 1.7% | 1.1% | 1.4% | 0.62% | 0.5% | 0.34% | 0.04% |
| Jun 2026 | 76.2% | 12.6% | 4.6% | 1.5% | 1.4% | 1.1% | 1.4% | 0.62% | 0.28% | 0.28% | 0.04% |
| Jul 2026 | 75.2% | 12.4% | 4.6% | 1.8% | 1.7% | 1.4% | 1.7% | 0.75% | 0.34% | 0.27% | 0.04% |
| Aug 2026 | 74.3% | 12.3% | 5.5% | 1.7% | 1.6% | 1.6% | 1.3% | 0.91% | 0.33% | 0.27% | 0.04% |
| Sep 2026 | 74.4% | 12.3% | 5.5% | 1.7% | 1.6% | 1.6% | 1.3% | 0.91% | 0.33% | 0.27% | 0.05% |
How has the MAGNA-TILES and Melissa & Doug comparison changed over the last 12 months?
3 findings
- MAGNA-TILES was ahead of Melissa & Doug in every measured month of the 12 months ending September 2026.
- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, MAGNA-TILES’s share of searches among toy brands worldwide moved from 1.9% to 1.6%, and its estimated monthly branded searches moved from 301K to 246K.
- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, Melissa & Doug’s share of searches among toy brands worldwide moved from 0.86% to 0.91%, and its estimated monthly branded searches held steady at 135K.
How did search popularity change for toy brands worldwide in September 2026?
1 change

MAGNA-TILES’s share of searches among toy brands worldwide has gained ground for 3 months in a row, from 1.1% to 1.6% in September 2026.
How are branded searches counted?
3 search terms
Brandwave collects information about searches that people make online using MAGNA-TILES’s and Melissa & Doug’s names. When viewed over time, estimated search volumes for these branded terms can be used to understand whether interest in the brands is growing, holding steady, or fading.
MAGNA-TILES
1 branded search term
- magna tiles
Melissa & Doug
2 branded search terms
- melissa doug
- melissadoug toys
Other head-to-heads among toy brands

Put your own brand in this comparison
Brandwave tracks your branded demand next to the rival you actually watch, with your campaigns, spend and outcomes on the same timeline.