Jonas Club Software vs Wild Apricot:Which is more popular?
In September 2026, Wild Apricot had more branded searches than Jonas Club Software among club management software worldwide. Wild Apricot had about 9,900 branded searches, while Jonas Club Software had 880. Wild Apricot made up 4.2% of all club management software searches we track, and Jonas Club Software accounted for 0.37%. When we asked ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews about club management software, Jonas Club Software and Wild Apricot each appeared in three of the five answers. Wild Apricot was mentioned before Jonas Club Software in two out of three answers.
Who do people search for more?
Wild Apricot, about 11 searches for every 1 for Jonas Club Software
Who does AI mention more?
Both were mentioned in 3 of 5 answers.
Who does AI recommend more?
Wild Apricot, named ahead of Jonas Club Software in 2 of 3 answers
Follow Jonas Club Software vs Wild Apricot and get free monthly updates on what changed
By continuing you'll get index updates and occasional product news from Brandwave. Unsubscribe any time. Privacy
Top club management software in ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews
In three ChatGPT questions and two Google AI Overviews, Jonas Club Software and Wild Apricot were each mentioned in three out of five: in two of the three ChatGPT answers and in one of the two Google AI Overviews. Wild Apricot was listed before Jonas Club Software in two out of three answers.
Most recommended by AI
Brands get a higher ranking if they are mentioned earlier in the answers.
Mentioned by AI
Each dot is one answer, filled in when that answer mentions the brand.
- Wild Apricot3 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
Jonas Club Software3 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
TeamSnap2 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
Clubessential2 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
ClubExpress2 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
MemberClicks1 of 5Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
ClubSpark0 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
Perfect Gym0 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
Jonas Fitness0 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
See every answer about club management software
5 answers
Asked ChatGPT
“Which club management software should I use?”
Asked ChatGPT
“What are the best club management software options?”
Asked ChatGPT
“What's the best club management software for club operations?”
Searched Google, AI Overview
“club management software”
Searched Google, AI Overview
“membership management software”
Not named in any answer:
Brands are shown in the order each answer named them. The survey took place in the United States on October 20, 2026.
Is Jonas Club Software or Wild Apricot more popular in search?
This chart shows how often people search Google for Jonas Club Software and Wild Apricot by name. Each line represents a brand's share of searches for all nine club management software we track, month by month, from English-language searches worldwide.
Share of searches by month for Wild Apricot, Jonas Club Software. The figures are in the table below the chart.
View monthly share of searches table
| Month | TeamSnap | ClubSpark | Perfect Gym | Wild Apricot | Clubessential | ClubExpress | MemberClicks | Jonas Club Software | Jonas Fitness |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 2025 | 83.8% | 3.4% | 4.1% | 5% | 1.2% | 1.2% | 0.67% | 0.42% | 0.2% |
| Nov 2025 | 85.5% | 2.8% | 3.4% | 5.1% | 1% | 1% | 0.55% | 0.37% | 0.17% |
| Dec 2025 | 82% | 3.3% | 4.9% | 6% | 1.2% | 1.2% | 0.79% | 0.44% | 0.24% |
| Jan 2026 | 80.1% | 3.9% | 4.8% | 7.2% | 1.2% | 1.4% | 0.78% | 0.43% | 0.24% |
| Feb 2026 | 81.3% | 4% | 4.9% | 6% | 1.2% | 1.2% | 0.79% | 0.43% | 0.24% |
| Mar 2026 | 82.7% | 5% | 4.1% | 5% | 0.99% | 0.99% | 0.66% | 0.41% | 0.17% |
| Apr 2026 | 79.7% | 7.1% | 4.8% | 4.8% | 1.2% | 1.2% | 0.63% | 0.48% | 0.2% |
| May 2026 | 80.7% | 5.9% | 4.8% | 4.8% | 1.2% | 1.2% | 0.64% | 0.49% | 0.17% |
| Jun 2026 | 78.5% | 5.8% | 5.8% | 5.8% | 1.1% | 1.7% | 0.76% | 0.51% | 0.19% |
| Jul 2026 | 74.2% | 8.2% | 6.7% | 6.7% | 1.3% | 1.3% | 0.88% | 0.59% | 0.23% |
| Aug 2026 | 84.8% | 4.2% | 4.2% | 4.2% | 0.8% | 0.8% | 0.55% | 0.37% | 0.14% |
| Sep 2026 | 84.9% | 4.2% | 4.2% | 4.2% | 0.8% | 0.8% | 0.42% | 0.37% | 0.14% |
How has the Jonas Club Software and Wild Apricot comparison changed over the last 12 months?
3 findings
- Wild Apricot was ahead of Jonas Club Software in every measured month of the 12 months ending September 2026.
- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, Jonas Club Software’s share of searches among club management software worldwide moved from 0.42% to 0.37%, and its estimated monthly branded searches moved from 1K to 880.
- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, Wild Apricot’s share of searches among club management software worldwide moved from 5% to 4.2%, and its estimated monthly branded searches moved from 12.1K to 9.9K.
How did search popularity change for club management software worldwide in September 2026?
2 changes
Estimated monthly branded searches for Wild Apricot worldwide fell 18.2% over 12 measured months, from 12.1K to 9.9K in September 2026.
Estimated monthly branded searches for Jonas Club Software worldwide fell 12% over 12 measured months, from 1K to 880 in September 2026.
How are branded searches counted?
2 search terms
Brandwave collects information about searches that people make online using Jonas Club Software’s and Wild Apricot’s names. When viewed over time, estimated search volumes for these branded terms can be used to understand whether interest in the brands is growing, holding steady, or fading.
Jonas Club Software
1 branded search term
- jonas club software
Wild Apricot
1 branded search term
- wild apricot
Other head-to-heads among club management software
Put your own brand in this comparison
Brandwave tracks your branded demand next to the rival you actually watch, with your campaigns, spend and outcomes on the same timeline.