Foreo vs ZIIP:Which is more popular?
In October 2026, ZIIP had more branded searches than Foreo among microcurrent device brands worldwide. ZIIP had about 18,100 branded searches, while Foreo had 9,900. ZIIP made up 14.2% of all microcurrent device brand searches we track, and Foreo accounted for 7.8%. When we asked ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews about microcurrent device brands, Foreo and ZIIP each appeared in three of the five answers. ZIIP was mentioned before Foreo in three out of five answers.
Who do people search for more?
ZIIP, about 83% more searches than Foreo
Who does AI mention more?
Both were mentioned in 3 of 5 answers.
Who does AI recommend more?
ZIIP, named ahead of Foreo in 3 of 5 answers
Follow Foreo vs ZIIP and get free monthly updates on what changed
By continuing you'll get index updates and occasional product news from Brandwave. Unsubscribe any time. Privacy
Top microcurrent device brands in ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews
In three ChatGPT questions and two Google AI Overviews, Foreo was mentioned in three out of five: in all three ChatGPT answers, but not in either of the two Google AI Overviews. ZIIP was mentioned in three out of five: in one of the three ChatGPT answers and in both Google AI Overviews. ZIIP was listed before Foreo in three out of five answers.
Most recommended by AI
Brands get a higher ranking if they are mentioned earlier in the answers.
Mentioned by AI
Each dot is one answer, filled in when that answer mentions the brand.
NuFace5 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 2 of 2 Google answers- ZIIP3 of 5Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 2 of 2 Google answers
Foreo3 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
Therabody2 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 2 of 2 Google answers
Solawave0 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
Medicube0 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers- MyoLift0 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
See every answer about microcurrent device brands
5 answers
Asked ChatGPT
“What's the best microcurrent device for the face?”
Asked ChatGPT
“Which at-home microcurrent device actually works?”
Asked ChatGPT
“What microcurrent facial toning device should I buy?”
Searched Google, AI Overview
“microcurrent facial device”
Searched Google, AI Overview
“microcurrent device”
Brands are shown in the order each answer named them. The survey took place in the United States on October 27, 2026.
Is Foreo or ZIIP more popular in search?
This chart shows how often people search Google for Foreo and ZIIP by name. Each line represents a brand's share of searches for all seven microcurrent device brands we track, month by month, from English-language searches worldwide.
Share of searches by month for ZIIP, Foreo. The figures are in the table below the chart.
View monthly share of searches table
| Month | NuFace | Therabody | Solawave | ZIIP | Foreo | Medicube | MyoLift |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 2025 | 41.2% | 19.2% | 15.1% | 8.2% | 8.2% | 5.5% | 2.5% |
| Dec 2025 | 40.7% | 20.8% | 14.9% | 6.6% | 10% | 5.4% | 1.6% |
| Jan 2026 | 43.7% | 13.7% | 16% | 7.1% | 10.7% | 7.1% | 1.7% |
| Feb 2026 | 41.5% | 14.5% | 15.2% | 8.3% | 10.2% | 8.3% | 2% |
| Mar 2026 | 41% | 12.8% | 15.1% | 8.2% | 12.3% | 8.2% | 2.4% |
| Apr 2026 | 44.6% | 11.4% | 16.4% | 7.3% | 10.9% | 7.3% | 2.1% |
| May 2026 | 38.9% | 13.5% | 17.5% | 7.8% | 11.6% | 7.8% | 2.8% |
| Jun 2026 | 43.5% | 12% | 15.9% | 8.7% | 8.7% | 8.7% | 2.5% |
| Jul 2026 | 38.2% | 14.5% | 17.1% | 9.3% | 9.3% | 9.3% | 2.3% |
| Aug 2026 | 38.1% | 14.2% | 17% | 9.3% | 9.3% | 9.3% | 2.7% |
| Sep 2026 | 43.6% | 13.3% | 15.9% | 8.7% | 8.7% | 7.1% | 2.6% |
| Oct 2026 | 38.9% | 14.8% | 14.2% | 14.2% | 7.8% | 7.8% | 2.3% |
How has branded search for Foreo and ZIIP changed worldwide over the last 12 months?
3 findings
- The lead changed hands once in the 12 months ending October 2026: ZIIP took it in October 2026.
- Across the 12 months ending October 2026, Foreo’s share of searches among microcurrent device brands worldwide moved from 8.2% to 7.8%, and its estimated monthly branded searches moved from 18.1K to 9.9K.
- Across the 12 months ending October 2026, ZIIP’s share of searches among microcurrent device brands worldwide moved from 8.2% to 14.2%, and its estimated monthly branded searches held steady at 18.1K.
How did search popularity change for microcurrent device brands worldwide in October 2026?
2 changes
In October 2026, ZIIP overtook Foreo to rank 4th among microcurrent device brands worldwide, with 14.2% of the searches.
In October 2026, Foreo lost share of searches among microcurrent device brands worldwide, from 8.7% to 7.8%.
How are Foreo’s and ZIIP’s branded searches counted?
2 search terms
Brandwave collects information about searches that people make online using Foreo’s and ZIIP’s names. When viewed over time, estimated search volumes for these branded terms can be used to understand whether interest in the brands is growing, holding steady, or fading.
Other head-to-heads among microcurrent device brands
Put your own brand in this comparison
Brandwave tracks your branded demand next to the rival you actually watch, with your campaigns, spend and outcomes on the same timeline.