Brandwave

Foreo vs MyoLift:Which is more popular?

In October 2026, Foreo had more branded searches than MyoLift among microcurrent device brands worldwide. Foreo had about 9,900 branded searches, while MyoLift had 2,900. Foreo made up 7.8% of all microcurrent device brand searches we track, and MyoLift accounted for 2.3%. When we asked ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews about microcurrent device brands, Foreo appeared in three of the five answers and MyoLift in none.

Among microcurrent device brands worldwide in October 2026

Who do people search for more?

Foreo, about 3 searches for every 1 for MyoLift

Foreo 9.9K searchesMyoLift 2.9K searches

Who does AI mention more?

Foreo, mentioned in 3 of 5 answers, MyoLift in 0

Foreo in 3 of 5MyoLift in 0 of 5

Who does AI recommend more?

Foreo, the only one of the two named

Foreo first in 3MyoLift never named

Follow Foreo vs MyoLift and get free monthly updates on what changed

By continuing you'll get index updates and occasional product news from Brandwave. Unsubscribe any time. Privacy

Track your brand against a rival →

Top microcurrent device brands in ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews

In three ChatGPT questions and two Google AI Overviews, Foreo was mentioned in three out of five: in all three ChatGPT answers, but not in either of the two Google AI Overviews. MyoLift did not appear in any of the five answers.

Most recommended by AI

Brands get a higher ranking if they are mentioned earlier in the answers.

  1. NuFace1st
  2. ZIIP2nd
  3. Foreo3rd
  4. Therabody4th
  5. Solawave–
  6. Medicube–
  7. MyoLift–

Mentioned by AI

Each dot is one answer, filled in when that answer mentions the brand.

  • NuFace5 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 2 of 2 Google answers
  • ZIIP3 of 5Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 2 of 2 Google answers
  • Foreo3 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
  • Therabody2 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 2 of 2 Google answers
  • Solawave0 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
  • Medicube0 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
  • MyoLift0 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers

See every answer about microcurrent device brands

5 answers
  • Asked ChatGPT

    “What's the best microcurrent device for the face?”

    1. 1NuFace
    2. 2ZIIP
    3. 3Foreo
  • Asked ChatGPT

    “Which at-home microcurrent device actually works?”

    1. 1NuFace
    2. 2Foreo
  • Asked ChatGPT

    “What microcurrent facial toning device should I buy?”

    1. 1NuFace
    2. 2Foreo
  • Searched Google, AI Overview

    “microcurrent facial device”

    1. 1NuFace
    2. 2ZIIP
    3. 3Therabody
  • Searched Google, AI Overview

    “microcurrent device”

    1. 1NuFace
    2. 2ZIIP
    3. 3Therabody

Not named in any answer:

Brands are shown in the order each answer named them. The survey took place in the United States on October 27, 2026.

Is Foreo or MyoLift more popular in search?

This chart shows how often people search Google for Foreo and MyoLift by name. Each line represents a brand's share of searches for all seven microcurrent device brands we track, month by month, from English-language searches worldwide.

Foreo and MyoLift among microcurrent device brands worldwide, by month

Share of searches by month for Foreo, MyoLift. The figures are in the table below the chart.

View monthly share of searches table
MonthNuFaceTherabodySolawaveZIIPForeoMedicubeMyoLift
Nov 202541.2%19.2%15.1%8.2%8.2%5.5%2.5%
Dec 202540.7%20.8%14.9%6.6%10%5.4%1.6%
Jan 202643.7%13.7%16%7.1%10.7%7.1%1.7%
Feb 202641.5%14.5%15.2%8.3%10.2%8.3%2%
Mar 202641%12.8%15.1%8.2%12.3%8.2%2.4%
Apr 202644.6%11.4%16.4%7.3%10.9%7.3%2.1%
May 202638.9%13.5%17.5%7.8%11.6%7.8%2.8%
Jun 202643.5%12%15.9%8.7%8.7%8.7%2.5%
Jul 202638.2%14.5%17.1%9.3%9.3%9.3%2.3%
Aug 202638.1%14.2%17%9.3%9.3%9.3%2.7%
Sep 202643.6%13.3%15.9%8.7%8.7%7.1%2.6%
Oct 202638.9%14.8%14.2%14.2%7.8%7.8%2.3%

How has branded search for Foreo and MyoLift changed worldwide over the last 12 months?

3 findings
  • Foreo was ahead of MyoLift in every measured month of the 12 months ending October 2026.
  • Across the 12 months ending October 2026, Foreo’s share of searches among microcurrent device brands worldwide moved from 8.2% to 7.8%, and its estimated monthly branded searches moved from 18.1K to 9.9K.
  • Across the 12 months ending October 2026, MyoLift’s share of searches among microcurrent device brands worldwide moved from 2.5% to 2.3%, and its estimated monthly branded searches moved from 5.4K to 2.9K.

How did search popularity change for microcurrent device brands worldwide in October 2026?

3 changes
  1. In October 2026, ZIIP overtook Foreo to rank 4th among microcurrent device brands worldwide, with 14.2% of the searches.

  2. In October 2026, Foreo lost share of searches among microcurrent device brands worldwide, from 8.7% to 7.8%.

  3. Estimated monthly branded searches for MyoLift worldwide fell 46.3% over 12 measured months, from 5.4K to 2.9K in October 2026.

How are Foreo’s and MyoLift’s branded searches counted?

2 search terms

Brandwave collects information about searches that people make online using Foreo’s and MyoLift’s names. When viewed over time, estimated search volumes for these branded terms can be used to understand whether interest in the brands is growing, holding steady, or fading.

Foreo

1 branded search term

  • foreo bear

MyoLift

1 branded search term

  • myolift

How the Brand Demand Index is measured

Other head-to-heads among microcurrent device brands

Creator with pink hair and a pink jacket

Put your own brand in this comparison

Brandwave tracks your branded demand next to the rival you actually watch, with your campaigns, spend and outcomes on the same timeline.