Fishers Finery vs Mulberry Park Silks:Which is more popular?
In September 2026, Fishers Finery had more branded searches than Mulberry Park Silks among silk pillowcase brands worldwide. Fishers Finery had about 2,400 branded searches, while Mulberry Park Silks had 1,000. Fishers Finery made up 3.7% of all silk pillowcase brand searches we track, and Mulberry Park Silks accounted for 1.5%. When we asked ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews about silk pillowcase brands, Fishers Finery appeared in all five answers and Mulberry Park Silks in one. Fishers Finery was mentioned before Mulberry Park Silks in every answer.
Who do people search for more?
Fishers Finery, about 2 searches for every 1 for Mulberry Park Silks
Who does AI mention more?
Fishers Finery, mentioned in every answer we collected
Who does AI recommend more?
Fishers Finery, named ahead of Mulberry Park Silks in every answer
Follow Fishers Finery vs Mulberry Park Silks and get free monthly updates on what changed
By continuing you'll get index updates and occasional product news from Brandwave. Unsubscribe any time. Privacy
Top silk pillowcase brands in ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews
In three ChatGPT questions and two Google AI Overviews, Fishers Finery appeared in all five answers. Mulberry Park Silks was mentioned in one out of five: in one of the three ChatGPT answers, but not in either of the two Google AI Overviews. Fishers Finery was listed before Mulberry Park Silks in every answer.
Most recommended by AI
Brands get a higher ranking if they are mentioned earlier in the answers.
Fishers Finery1st
Quince2nd
Slip3rd
Blissy4th
Brooklinen5th
LilySilk6th
Mulberry Park Silks7th
Kitsch–
ZimaSilk–- Alaska Bear–
Mentioned by AI
Each dot is one answer, filled in when that answer mentions the brand.
Blissy5 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 2 of 2 Google answers
Fishers Finery5 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 2 of 2 Google answers
Slip4 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 2 of 2 Google answers
Quince4 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 2 of 2 Google answers
Mulberry Park Silks1 of 5Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
LilySilk1 of 5Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
Brooklinen1 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
Kitsch0 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
ZimaSilk0 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers- Alaska Bear0 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
See every answer about silk pillowcase brands
5 answers
Asked ChatGPT
“Which silk pillowcase brand should I buy?”
Asked ChatGPT
“What are the best silk pillowcase brands?”
Asked ChatGPT
“What's the best silk pillowcase brand for hair and skin?”
Searched Google, AI Overview
“silk pillowcase”
Searched Google, AI Overview
“best silk pillowcase”
Not named in any answer:
Brands are shown in the order each answer named them. The survey took place in the United States on October 22, 2026.
Is Fishers Finery or Mulberry Park Silks more popular in search?
This chart shows how often people search Google for Fishers Finery and Mulberry Park Silks by name. Each line represents a brand's share of searches for all ten silk pillowcase brands we track, month by month, from English-language searches worldwide.
Share of searches by month for Fishers Finery, Mulberry Park Silks. The figures are in the table below the chart.
View monthly share of searches table
| Month | Blissy | Slip | Kitsch | Fishers Finery | Quince | Mulberry Park Silks | LilySilk | ZimaSilk | Brooklinen | Alaska Bear |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 2025 | 77.6% | 8.5% | 3.7% | 3.1% | 2.1% | 1.3% | 1.3% | 1.3% | 0.76% | 0.34% |
| Nov 2025 | 75% | 9.2% | 5% | 3.3% | 3.3% | 0.99% | 0.99% | 0.81% | 1.2% | 0.2% |
| Dec 2025 | 71.7% | 9.6% | 6.4% | 4.3% | 2.3% | 1.3% | 1.9% | 0.85% | 1.3% | 0.26% |
| Jan 2026 | 66.7% | 13.4% | 4.9% | 4% | 4.9% | 1.8% | 1.4% | 1.4% | 1.1% | 0.35% |
| Feb 2026 | 58.3% | 23.3% | 5.7% | 3.1% | 3.1% | 1.3% | 1.1% | 1.3% | 2.5% | 0.34% |
| Mar 2026 | 67.8% | 13.1% | 5.8% | 3.8% | 3.2% | 2.1% | 1.2% | 1.7% | 0.78% | 0.42% |
| Apr 2026 | 64.6% | 15.3% | 6.8% | 3.7% | 3.7% | 2% | 1.4% | 1.5% | 0.74% | 0.32% |
| May 2026 | 58.9% | 13.9% | 13.9% | 3.4% | 4.1% | 1.8% | 1.4% | 1.4% | 0.83% | 0.37% |
| Jun 2026 | 55.3% | 12.1% | 18.1% | 3.6% | 5.4% | 1.5% | 1.3% | 1.5% | 0.88% | 0.39% |
| Jul 2026 | 49.7% | 11.7% | 21.5% | 2.8% | 9.6% | 1.2% | 1% | 1.2% | 0.85% | 0.31% |
| Aug 2026 | 58.5% | 8.5% | 15.7% | 3.8% | 8.5% | 1.7% | 1.1% | 1.3% | 0.62% | 0.27% |
| Sep 2026 | 69.2% | 10.1% | 8.3% | 3.7% | 3.7% | 1.5% | 1.3% | 1.3% | 0.6% | 0.26% |
How has the Fishers Finery and Mulberry Park Silks comparison changed over the last 12 months?
3 findings
- Fishers Finery was ahead of Mulberry Park Silks in every measured month of the 12 months ending September 2026.
- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, Fishers Finery’s share of searches among silk pillowcase brands worldwide moved from 3.1% to 3.7%, and its estimated monthly branded searches held steady at 2.4K.
- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, Mulberry Park Silks’ share of searches among silk pillowcase brands worldwide moved from 1.3% to 1.5%, and its estimated monthly branded searches held steady at 1K.
How did search popularity change for silk pillowcase brands worldwide in September 2026?
1 change

In September 2026, Fishers Finery rose from 5th to 4th among silk pillowcase brands worldwide.
How are branded searches counted?
2 search terms
Brandwave collects information about searches that people make online using Fishers Finery’s and Mulberry Park Silks’ names. When viewed over time, estimated search volumes for these branded terms can be used to understand whether interest in the brands is growing, holding steady, or fading.
Fishers Finery
1 branded search term
- fishers finery
Mulberry Park Silks
1 branded search term
- mulberry park silks
Other head-to-heads among silk pillowcase brands

Put your own brand in this comparison
Brandwave tracks your branded demand next to the rival you actually watch, with your campaigns, spend and outcomes on the same timeline.