Brandwave

Electrolux vs Tineco:Which is more popular?

In September 2026, Electrolux had more branded searches than Tineco among cordless vacuum brands worldwide. Electrolux had about 1.5 million branded searches, while Tineco had 368,000. Electrolux made up 16.3% of all cordless vacuum brand searches we track, and Tineco accounted for 4%. When we asked ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews about cordless vacuum brands, Tineco appeared in three of the five answers and Electrolux in none.

Among cordless vacuum brands worldwide in September 2026

Who do people search for more?

Electrolux, about 4 searches for every 1 for Tineco

Electrolux 1.5M searchesTineco 368K searches

Who does AI mention more?

Tineco, mentioned in 3 of 5 answers, Electrolux in 0

Tineco in 3 of 5Electrolux in 0 of 5

Who does AI recommend more?

Tineco, the only one of the two named

Tineco first in 3Electrolux never named

Follow Electrolux vs Tineco and get free monthly updates on what changed

By continuing you'll get index updates and occasional product news from Brandwave. Unsubscribe any time. Privacy

Track your brand against a rival →

Top cordless vacuum brands in ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews

In three ChatGPT questions and two Google AI Overviews, Tineco was mentioned in three out of five: in two of the three ChatGPT answers and in one of the two Google AI Overviews. Electrolux did not appear in any of the five answers.

Most recommended by AI

Brands get a higher ranking if they are mentioned earlier in the answers.

  1. Dyson1st
  2. Shark2nd
  3. LG3rd
  4. Tineco4th
  5. Samsung5th
  6. Electrolux–
  7. Ryobi–
  8. BISSELL–
  9. Hoover–
  10. Miele–

Mentioned by AI

Each dot is one answer, filled in when that answer mentions the brand.

  • Dyson5 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 2 of 2 Google answers
  • Shark5 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 2 of 2 Google answers
  • Tineco3 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
  • LG2 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
  • Samsung1 of 5Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
  • Electrolux0 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
  • Ryobi0 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
  • BISSELL0 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
  • Hoover0 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
  • Miele0 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers

See every answer about cordless vacuum brands

5 answers
  • Asked ChatGPT

    “Which cordless vacuum brand should I buy?”

    1. 1Dyson
    2. 2Shark
    3. 3LG
  • Asked ChatGPT

    “What are the best cordless vacuum brands?”

    1. 1Dyson
    2. 2Shark
    3. 3LG
    4. 4Samsung
    5. 5Tineco
  • Asked ChatGPT

    “What's the best cordless vacuum brand for easy everyday cleaning?”

    1. 1Dyson
    2. 2Shark
    3. 3Tineco
  • Searched Google, AI Overview

    “best cordless vacuum”

    1. 1Shark
    2. 2Dyson
    3. 3Tineco
  • Searched Google, AI Overview

    “cordless vacuum cleaner”

    1. 1Dyson
    2. 2Shark

Not named in any answer:

Brands are shown in the order each answer named them. The survey took place in the United States on October 19, 2026.

Is Electrolux or Tineco more popular in search?

This chart shows how often people search Google for Electrolux and Tineco by name. Each line represents a brand's share of searches for all ten cordless vacuum brands we track, month by month, from English-language searches worldwide.

Electrolux and Tineco among cordless vacuum brands worldwide, by month

Share of searches by month for Electrolux, Tineco. The figures are in the table below the chart.

View monthly share of searches table
MonthDysonElectroluxRyobiLGSharkBISSELLTinecoHooverSamsungMiele
Oct 202553.4%16%6.8%5%4%3.9%4.8%3.2%1.6%1.2%
Nov 202555.5%16.6%6.8%2.9%3.4%3.3%6.1%2.7%1.4%1.2%
Dec 202556.9%13.9%7%3.6%4.2%2.8%5.1%3.4%1.4%1.5%
Jan 202652.4%15.7%7.2%5%3.9%3.2%5.8%3.9%1.6%1.4%
Feb 202651.7%15.4%7.1%6%3.9%3.8%4.7%3.8%2.2%1.4%
Mar 202647.2%17.3%9%6.6%4.3%4.2%4.2%3.5%2%1.6%
Apr 202649.7%18.2%9.5%4.7%3.7%3.7%3.7%3.7%1.8%1.3%
May 202649.3%18.1%10.1%4.7%4.5%3%3.6%3.6%1.8%1.3%
Jun 202649.4%18.1%10.6%4.7%3.7%3%4.4%3%1.8%1.3%
Jul 202647.4%17.3%10.1%5.5%4.3%3.5%4.3%3.5%2.5%1.6%
Aug 202648.1%17.6%8.4%5.6%4.4%4.3%4.3%3.5%2.1%1.6%
Sep 202654.2%16.3%7.2%4.2%4.1%4%4%3.3%1.6%1.2%

How has the Electrolux and Tineco comparison changed over the last 12 months?

3 findings
  • Electrolux was ahead of Tineco in every measured month of the 12 months ending September 2026.
  • Across the 12 months ending September 2026, Electrolux’s share of searches among cordless vacuum brands worldwide moved from 16% to 16.3%, and its estimated monthly branded searches held steady at 1.5M.
  • Across the 12 months ending September 2026, Tineco’s share of searches among cordless vacuum brands worldwide moved from 4.8% to 4%, and its estimated monthly branded searches moved from 450K to 368K.

How did search popularity change for cordless vacuum brands worldwide in September 2026?

2 changes
  1. In September 2026, Electrolux lost share of searches among cordless vacuum brands worldwide, from 17.6% to 16.3%.

  2. Estimated monthly branded searches for Tineco worldwide fell 18.2% over 12 measured months, from 450K to 368K in September 2026.

How are branded searches counted?

2 search terms

Brandwave collects information about searches that people make online using Electrolux’s and Tineco’s names. When viewed over time, estimated search volumes for these branded terms can be used to understand whether interest in the brands is growing, holding steady, or fading.

Electrolux

1 branded search term

  • electrolux

Tineco

1 branded search term

  • tineco

How the Brand Demand Index is measured

Other head-to-heads among cordless vacuum brands

Creator with pink hair and a pink jacket

Put your own brand in this comparison

Brandwave tracks your branded demand next to the rival you actually watch, with your campaigns, spend and outcomes on the same timeline.