Brandwave

Dynamic Discs vs Latitude 64:Which is more popular?

In September 2026, Latitude 64 had more branded searches than Dynamic Discs among disc golf disc brands worldwide. Latitude 64 had about 9,900 branded searches, while Dynamic Discs had 6,600. Latitude 64 made up 12.8% of all disc golf disc brand searches we track, and Dynamic Discs accounted for 8.5%. When we asked ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews about disc golf disc brands, Latitude 64 appeared in four of the five answers and Dynamic Discs in three. Latitude 64 was mentioned before Dynamic Discs in three out of four answers.

Among disc golf disc brands worldwide in September 2026

Who do people search for more?

Latitude 64, about 50% more searches than Dynamic Discs

Latitude 64 9.9K searchesDynamic Discs 6.6K searches

Who does AI mention more?

Latitude 64, mentioned in 4 of 5 answers, Dynamic Discs in 3

Latitude 64 in 4 of 5Dynamic Discs in 3 of 5

Who does AI recommend more?

Latitude 64, named ahead of Dynamic Discs in 3 of 4 answers

Latitude 64 first in 3Dynamic Discs first in 1

Follow Dynamic Discs vs Latitude 64 and get free monthly updates on what changed

By continuing you'll get index updates and occasional product news from Brandwave. Unsubscribe any time. Privacy

Track your brand against a rival →

Top disc golf disc brands in ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews

In three ChatGPT questions and two Google AI Overviews, Latitude 64 was mentioned in four out of five: in all three ChatGPT answers and in one of the two Google AI Overviews. Dynamic Discs was mentioned in three out of five: in two of the three ChatGPT answers and in one of the two Google AI Overviews. Latitude 64 was listed before Dynamic Discs in three out of four answers.

Most recommended by AI

Brands get a higher ranking if they are mentioned earlier in the answers.

  1. Innova1st
  2. Discraft2nd
  3. Latitude 643rd
  4. Dynamic Discs4th
  5. MVP Disc Sports5th
  6. Discmania6th
  7. Kastaplast7th
  8. Westside Discs8th
  9. Axiom Discs9th
  10. Prodigy Disc–

Mentioned by AI

Each dot is one answer, filled in when that answer mentions the brand.

  • Innova5 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 2 of 2 Google answers
  • Discraft4 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 2 of 2 Google answers
  • Latitude 644 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
  • Dynamic Discs3 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
  • Kastaplast2 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
  • Discmania1 of 5Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
  • Axiom Discs1 of 5Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
  • Westside Discs1 of 5Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
  • MVP Disc Sports1 of 5Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
  • Prodigy Disc0 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers

See every answer about disc golf disc brands

5 answers

Not named in any answer:

Brands are shown in the order each answer named them. The survey took place in the United States on October 22, 2026.

Is Dynamic Discs or Latitude 64 more popular in search?

This chart shows how often people search Google for Dynamic Discs and Latitude 64 by name. Each line represents a brand's share of searches for all ten disc golf disc brands we track, month by month, from English-language searches worldwide.

Dynamic Discs and Latitude 64 among disc golf disc brands worldwide, by month

Share of searches by month for Latitude 64, Dynamic Discs. The figures are in the table below the chart.

View monthly share of searches table
MonthDiscmaniaDiscraftInnovaLatitude 64Dynamic DiscsAxiom DiscsKastaplastWestside DiscsProdigy DiscMVP Disc Sports
Oct 202517.1%20.9%20.8%11.4%9.4%5.1%4.2%5.1%4.2%1.8%
Nov 202519.8%24.2%17.7%10.8%8.8%3.9%3.2%3.9%5.9%1.7%
Dec 202515.7%19.2%23.3%10.5%12.8%4.7%3.8%3.8%4.7%1.7%
Jan 202614.9%18.3%24.4%10%10%5.4%3.6%4.4%5.4%3.6%
Feb 202613.5%20.2%22.1%13.5%9%4.8%4.8%4.8%4.8%2.2%
Mar 202618.2%18.2%22.2%12.2%8.1%4.4%5.4%4.4%4.4%2.3%
Apr 202622.1%18%20.1%12.1%8.1%4.4%4.4%5.4%3.6%1.9%
May 202621.6%17.6%19.6%11.8%7.9%4.3%5.2%5.2%5.2%1.6%
Jun 202620.7%16.9%18.9%13.8%7.5%5%6.2%5%4.1%1.8%
Jul 202623.5%19.2%19%10.5%7%4.7%4.7%4.7%3.8%3.1%
Aug 202622.3%18.2%18.1%14.9%6.6%4.4%4.4%5.4%3.6%1.9%
Sep 202623.4%19.2%16.2%12.8%8.5%4.7%4.7%4.7%3.8%2.1%

How has the Dynamic Discs and Latitude 64 comparison changed over the last 12 months?

3 findings
  • The lead changed hands 2 times in the 12 months ending September 2026: Dynamic Discs took it in December 2025, Latitude 64 took it in February 2026.
  • Across the 12 months ending September 2026, Dynamic Discs’ share of searches among disc golf disc brands worldwide moved from 9.4% to 8.5%, and its estimated monthly branded searches moved from 8.1K to 6.6K.
  • Across the 12 months ending September 2026, Latitude 64’s share of searches among disc golf disc brands worldwide moved from 11.4% to 12.8%, and its estimated monthly branded searches held steady at 9.9K.

How did search popularity change for disc golf disc brands worldwide in September 2026?

2 changes
  1. In September 2026, Dynamic Discs gained share of searches among disc golf disc brands worldwide, from 6.6% to 8.5%.

  2. In September 2026, Latitude 64 lost share of searches among disc golf disc brands worldwide, from 14.9% to 12.8%.

How are branded searches counted?

2 search terms

Brandwave collects information about searches that people make online using Dynamic Discs’ and Latitude 64’s names. When viewed over time, estimated search volumes for these branded terms can be used to understand whether interest in the brands is growing, holding steady, or fading.

Dynamic Discs

1 branded search term

  • dynamic discs

Latitude 64

1 branded search term

  • latitude 64

How the Brand Demand Index is measured

Other head-to-heads among disc golf disc brands

Creator with pink hair and a pink jacket

Put your own brand in this comparison

Brandwave tracks your branded demand next to the rival you actually watch, with your campaigns, spend and outcomes on the same timeline.