Ansible vs Azure Bicep:Which is more popular?
In September 2026, Ansible had more branded searches than Azure Bicep among infrastructure as code tools worldwide. Ansible had about 135,000 branded searches, while Azure Bicep had 3,600. Ansible made up 28% of all infrastructure as code tool searches we track, and Azure Bicep accounted for 0.75%. When we asked ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews about infrastructure as code tools, Ansible appeared in four of the five answers and Azure Bicep in two. Ansible was mentioned before Azure Bicep in three out of five answers.
Who do people search for more?
Ansible, about 38 searches for every 1 for Azure Bicep
Who does AI mention more?
Ansible, mentioned in 4 of 5 answers, Azure Bicep in 2
Who does AI recommend more?
Ansible, named ahead of Azure Bicep in 3 of 5 answers
Follow Ansible vs Azure Bicep and get free monthly updates on what changed
By continuing you'll get index updates and occasional product news from Brandwave. Unsubscribe any time. Privacy
Top infrastructure as code tools in ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews
In three ChatGPT questions and two Google AI Overviews, Ansible was mentioned in four out of five: in two of the three ChatGPT answers and in both Google AI Overviews. Azure Bicep was mentioned in two out of five: in two of the three ChatGPT answers, but not in either of the two Google AI Overviews. Ansible was listed before Azure Bicep in three out of five answers.
Most recommended by AI
Brands get a higher ranking if they are mentioned earlier in the answers.
OpenTofu1st
Terraform2nd
Pulumi3rd
AWS CloudFormation4th- AWS CDK5th
- Ansible6th
Crossplane7th
Azure Bicep8th
Puppet9th
Chef10th
Mentioned by AI
Each dot is one answer, filled in when that answer mentions the brand.
- Terraform5 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 2 of 2 Google answers
- AWS CloudFormation5 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 2 of 2 Google answers
- OpenTofu5 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 2 of 2 Google answers
- Pulumi5 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 2 of 2 Google answers
- Ansible4 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 2 of 2 Google answers
- AWS CDK4 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
- Crossplane2 of 5Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
- Azure Bicep2 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
- Chef2 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 2 of 2 Google answers
- Puppet2 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 2 of 2 Google answers
See every answer about infrastructure as code tools
5 answers
Asked ChatGPT
“Which infrastructure as code tool should I use?”
Asked ChatGPT
“What are the best infrastructure as code tools?”
Asked ChatGPT
“What's the best infrastructure as code tool for automated cloud setup?”
Searched Google, AI Overview
“infrastructure as code tools”
Searched Google, AI Overview
“iac tool”
Brands are shown in the order each answer named them. The survey took place in the United States on October 21, 2026.
Is Ansible or Azure Bicep more popular in search?
This chart shows how often people search Google for Ansible and Azure Bicep by name. Each line represents a brand's share of searches for all ten infrastructure as code tools we track, month by month, from English-language searches worldwide.
Share of searches by month for Ansible, Azure Bicep. The figures are in the table below the chart.
View monthly share of searches table
| Month | Terraform | Ansible | AWS CloudFormation | OpenTofu | Pulumi | AWS CDK | Crossplane | Azure Bicep | Chef | Puppet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 2025 | 51.2% | 28.1% | 7.1% | 3.1% | 4.6% | 3.1% | 2.1% | 0.61% | 0.1% | 0.1% |
| Nov 2025 | 48.7% | 26.7% | 8.3% | 3.6% | 5.4% | 3.6% | 2.9% | 0.57% | 0.17% | 0.14% |
| Dec 2025 | 50.1% | 27.5% | 7% | 3.7% | 5.5% | 3% | 2.5% | 0.49% | 0.12% | 0.12% |
| Jan 2026 | 49.3% | 27% | 7.8% | 3.6% | 5.4% | 3.6% | 2.4% | 0.58% | 0.1% | 0.1% |
| Feb 2026 | 49.5% | 27.2% | 7.9% | 3.6% | 5.5% | 3% | 2.4% | 0.72% | 0.12% | 0.08% |
| Mar 2026 | 50.8% | 27.9% | 6.6% | 3.7% | 4.6% | 3.1% | 2.5% | 0.61% | 0.1% | 0.08% |
| Apr 2026 | 49.5% | 27.2% | 7.9% | 3.6% | 5.5% | 3% | 2.4% | 0.72% | 0.08% | 0.08% |
| May 2026 | 50.3% | 27.6% | 7.6% | 3.7% | 4.5% | 3% | 2.5% | 0.59% | 0.08% | 0.08% |
| Jun 2026 | 50.4% | 27.7% | 6.6% | 4.5% | 4.5% | 3% | 2.5% | 0.59% | 0.05% | 0.08% |
| Jul 2026 | 53.5% | 23.9% | 7% | 4.8% | 4.8% | 2.6% | 2.6% | 0.63% | 0.06% | 0.07% |
| Aug 2026 | 48.9% | 26.8% | 7.8% | 5.4% | 4.4% | 2.9% | 2.9% | 0.71% | 0.08% | 0.08% |
| Sep 2026 | 51.1% | 28% | 6.7% | 4.6% | 3.8% | 2.5% | 2.5% | 0.75% | 0.07% | 0.07% |
How has the Ansible and Azure Bicep comparison changed over the last 12 months?
3 findings
- Ansible was ahead of Azure Bicep in every measured month of the 12 months ending September 2026.
- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, Ansible’s share of searches among infrastructure as code tools worldwide moved from 28.1% to 28%, and its estimated monthly branded searches moved from 165K to 135K.
- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, Azure Bicep’s share of searches among infrastructure as code tools worldwide moved from 0.61% to 0.75%, and its estimated monthly branded searches held steady at 3.6K.
How did search popularity change for infrastructure as code tools worldwide in September 2026?
1 change
In September 2026, Ansible gained share of searches among infrastructure as code tools worldwide, from 26.8% to 28%.
How are branded searches counted?
2 search terms
Brandwave collects information about searches that people make online using Ansible’s and Azure Bicep’s names. When viewed over time, estimated search volumes for these branded terms can be used to understand whether interest in the brands is growing, holding steady, or fading.
Ansible
1 branded search term
- ansible
Azure Bicep
1 branded search term
- azure bicep
Other head-to-heads among infrastructure as code tools
Put your own brand in this comparison
Brandwave tracks your branded demand next to the rival you actually watch, with your campaigns, spend and outcomes on the same timeline.