3D Slicer vs Fujifilm:Which is more popular?
In September 2026, Fujifilm had more branded searches than 3D Slicer among medical imaging software worldwide. Fujifilm had about 823,000 branded searches, while 3D Slicer had 27,100. Fujifilm made up 69.5% of all medical imaging software searches we track, and 3D Slicer accounted for 2.3%. When we asked ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews about medical imaging software, 3D Slicer appeared in four of the five answers and Fujifilm in none.
Who do people search for more?
Fujifilm, about 30 searches for every 1 for 3D Slicer
Who does AI mention more?
3D Slicer, mentioned in 4 of 5 answers, Fujifilm in 0
Who does AI recommend more?
3D Slicer, the only one of the two named
Follow 3D Slicer vs Fujifilm and get free monthly updates on what changed
By continuing you'll get index updates and occasional product news from Brandwave. Unsubscribe any time. Privacy
Top medical imaging software in ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews
In three ChatGPT questions and two Google AI Overviews, 3D Slicer was mentioned in four out of five: in all three ChatGPT answers and in one of the two Google AI Overviews. Fujifilm did not appear in any of the five answers.
Most recommended by AI
Brands get a higher ranking if they are mentioned earlier in the answers.
Weasis1st- 3D Slicer2nd
RadiAnt DICOM Viewer3rd
Horos4th
OsiriX MD5th
OHIF Viewer6th
Sectra7th
Philips8th
GE HealthCare9th- Fujifilm–
- +1 more
Mentioned by AI
Each dot is one answer, filled in when that answer mentions the brand.
- 3D Slicer4 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
- RadiAnt DICOM Viewer4 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
- Weasis3 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
- OsiriX MD3 of 5Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 2 of 2 Google answers
- OHIF Viewer3 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
- Horos3 of 5Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 2 of 2 Google answers
- GE HealthCare1 of 5Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
- Philips1 of 5Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
- Sectra1 of 5Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
- Fujifilm0 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
See every answer about medical imaging software
5 answers
Asked ChatGPT
“Which medical imaging software should I use?”
Asked ChatGPT
“What are the best medical imaging software options?”
Asked ChatGPT
“What's the best medical imaging software for medical image viewing?”
Searched Google, AI Overview
“dicom viewer software”
Searched Google, AI Overview
“medical imaging software”
Not named in any answer:
Brands are shown in the order each answer named them. The survey took place in the United States on October 21, 2026.
Is 3D Slicer or Fujifilm more popular in search?
This chart shows how often people search Google for 3D Slicer and Fujifilm by name. Each line represents a brand's share of searches for all 11 medical imaging software we track, month by month, from English-language searches worldwide.
Share of searches by month for Fujifilm, 3D Slicer. The figures are in the table below the chart.
View monthly share of searches table
| Month | Fujifilm | GE HealthCare | Philips | 3D Slicer | RadiAnt DICOM Viewer | Sectra | Weasis | OsiriX MD | Agfa HealthCare | OHIF Viewer | Horos |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 2025 | 63.6% | 10.4% | 19% | 2.1% | 1.7% | 1.1% | 0.63% | 0.7% | 0.34% | 0.19% | 0.15% |
| Nov 2025 | 62.3% | 8.3% | 22.8% | 2.1% | 1.6% | 1.1% | 0.61% | 0.57% | 0.27% | 0.22% | 0.14% |
| Dec 2025 | 67% | 7.4% | 20.2% | 1.8% | 1.5% | 0.81% | 0.44% | 0.49% | 0.19% | 0.16% | 0.11% |
| Jan 2026 | 67.7% | 9.1% | 16.7% | 1.8% | 2.1% | 0.82% | 0.55% | 0.61% | 0.24% | 0.2% | 0.13% |
| Feb 2026 | 62.6% | 10.2% | 18.7% | 2.5% | 2.4% | 1.4% | 0.75% | 0.7% | 0.33% | 0.27% | 0.18% |
| Mar 2026 | 67.1% | 11% | 13.5% | 2.7% | 2.5% | 1.2% | 0.66% | 0.61% | 0.29% | 0.29% | 0.15% |
| Apr 2026 | 67.2% | 11% | 13.5% | 2.7% | 2.5% | 1.2% | 0.66% | 0.61% | 0.29% | 0.24% | 0.16% |
| May 2026 | 70.8% | 9.5% | 11.6% | 2.8% | 2.2% | 1% | 0.7% | 0.64% | 0.31% | 0.25% | 0.16% |
| Jun 2026 | 67.1% | 11% | 13.5% | 2.7% | 2.1% | 1.5% | 0.81% | 0.61% | 0.36% | 0.29% | 0.16% |
| Jul 2026 | 72.9% | 9.7% | 9.7% | 2.4% | 2.2% | 1.1% | 0.72% | 0.53% | 0.32% | 0.26% | 0.14% |
| Aug 2026 | 70.8% | 9.5% | 11.6% | 2.3% | 2.6% | 1% | 0.85% | 0.52% | 0.31% | 0.25% | 0.14% |
| Sep 2026 | 69.5% | 11.4% | 11.4% | 2.3% | 2.1% | 1.2% | 0.84% | 0.52% | 0.3% | 0.24% | 0.16% |
How has the 3D Slicer and Fujifilm comparison changed over the last 12 months?
3 findings
- Fujifilm was ahead of 3D Slicer in every measured month of the 12 months ending September 2026.
- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, 3D Slicer’s share of searches among medical imaging software worldwide moved from 2.1% to 2.3%, and its estimated monthly branded searches held steady at 27.1K.
- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, Fujifilm’s share of searches among medical imaging software worldwide moved from 63.6% to 69.5%, and its estimated monthly branded searches held steady at 823K.
How did search popularity change for medical imaging software worldwide in September 2026?
2 changes
In September 2026, Fujifilm lost share of searches among medical imaging software worldwide, from 70.8% to 69.5%.
In September 2026, 3D Slicer rose from 5th to 4th among medical imaging software worldwide.
How are branded searches counted?
2 search terms
Brandwave collects information about searches that people make online using 3D Slicer’s and Fujifilm’s names. When viewed over time, estimated search volumes for these branded terms can be used to understand whether interest in the brands is growing, holding steady, or fading.
Other head-to-heads among medical imaging software
Put your own brand in this comparison
Brandwave tracks your branded demand next to the rival you actually watch, with your campaigns, spend and outcomes on the same timeline.