Greenhouse vs Workable:Which is more popular?
In September 2026, Workable had more branded searches than Greenhouse among recruitment software brands worldwide. Workable had about 60,500 branded searches, while Greenhouse had 4,400. Workable made up 40.1% of all recruitment software brand searches we track, and Greenhouse accounted for 2.9%. When we asked ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews about recruitment software brands, both Greenhouse and Workable appeared in all five answers. Greenhouse was mentioned before Workable in four out of five answers.
Who do people search for more?
Workable, about 14 searches for every 1 for Greenhouse
Who does AI mention more?
Both are mentioned in every answer we collected.
Who does AI recommend more?
Greenhouse, named ahead of Workable in 4 of 5 answers
Follow Greenhouse vs Workable and get free monthly updates on what changed
By continuing you'll get index updates and occasional product news from Brandwave. Unsubscribe any time. Privacy
Top recruitment software brands in ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews
In three ChatGPT questions and two Google AI Overviews, both Greenhouse and Workable showed up in all five answers. Greenhouse was listed before Workable in four of them.
Most recommended by AI
Brands get a higher ranking if they are mentioned earlier in the answers.
Mentioned by AI
Each dot is one answer, filled in when that answer mentions the brand.
- Workable5 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 2 of 2 Google answers
- Greenhouse5 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 2 of 2 Google answers
Ashby3 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
Lever3 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
Zoho Recruit2 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
Bullhorn2 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
Jobvite0 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
Vincere0 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
JobAdder0 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
Recruitee0 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
See every answer about recruitment software brands
5 answers
Asked ChatGPT
“Which recruitment software brand should I use?”
Asked ChatGPT
“What are the best recruitment software brands?”
Asked ChatGPT
“What's the best recruitment software brand for running hiring workflows?”
Searched Google, AI Overview
“applicant tracking system”
Searched Google, AI Overview
“ats software”
Brands are shown in the order each answer named them. The survey took place in the United States on October 21, 2026.
Is Greenhouse or Workable more popular in search?
This chart shows how often people search Google for Greenhouse and Workable by name. Each line represents a brand's share of searches for all 11 recruitment software brands we track, month by month, from English-language searches worldwide.
Share of searches by month for Workable, Greenhouse. The figures are in the table below the chart.
View monthly share of searches table
| Month | Workable | Zoho Recruit | Jobvite | Vincere | JobAdder | Greenhouse | Ashby | Lever | Recruitee | CATS | Bullhorn |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 2025 | 36% | 24.1% | 16.1% | 8.8% | 8.8% | 3.2% | 1.1% | 1.4% | 0.12% | 0.15% | 0.1% |
| Nov 2025 | 35% | 23.4% | 15.7% | 8.6% | 10.5% | 3.8% | 1.3% | 1.3% | 0.12% | 0.15% | 0.1% |
| Dec 2025 | 38.1% | 25.5% | 13.9% | 7.6% | 7.6% | 4.2% | 1.2% | 1.5% | 0.11% | 0.13% | 0.07% |
| Jan 2026 | 38% | 20.8% | 13.9% | 9.3% | 9.3% | 5.1% | 1.5% | 1.8% | 0.13% | 0.13% | 0.11% |
| Feb 2026 | 37.6% | 20.6% | 13.8% | 9.2% | 9.2% | 6.2% | 1.5% | 1.5% | 0.16% | 0.13% | 0.11% |
| Mar 2026 | 37.6% | 20.6% | 13.8% | 9.2% | 9.2% | 6.2% | 1.5% | 1.5% | 0.16% | 0.13% | 0.13% |
| Apr 2026 | 38.4% | 21% | 14.1% | 9.4% | 7.7% | 6.3% | 1.2% | 1.5% | 0.11% | 0.11% | 0.11% |
| May 2026 | 37.9% | 20.7% | 13.9% | 9.3% | 9.3% | 6.2% | 1.2% | 1.2% | 0.11% | 0.09% | 0.09% |
| Jun 2026 | 39.6% | 21.7% | 14.5% | 7.9% | 7.9% | 5.3% | 1.6% | 1% | 0.21% | 0.09% | 0.09% |
| Jul 2026 | 35.1% | 23.5% | 15.7% | 8.6% | 8.6% | 5.7% | 1.3% | 1.1% | 0.15% | 0.12% | 0.1% |
| Aug 2026 | 39.5% | 21.6% | 14.5% | 9.7% | 7.9% | 4.3% | 1.2% | 0.85% | 0.14% | 0.14% | 0.07% |
| Sep 2026 | 40.1% | 21.9% | 14.7% | 9.8% | 8% | 2.9% | 1.3% | 0.86% | 0.14% | 0.11% | 0.09% |
How has the Greenhouse and Workable comparison changed over the last 12 months?
3 findings
- Workable was ahead of Greenhouse in every measured month of the 12 months ending September 2026.
- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, Greenhouse’s share of searches among recruitment software brands worldwide moved from 3.2% to 2.9%, and its estimated monthly branded searches moved from 5.4K to 4.4K.
- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, Workable’s share of searches among recruitment software brands worldwide moved from 36% to 40.1%, and its estimated monthly branded searches held steady at 60.5K.
How did search popularity change for recruitment software brands worldwide in September 2026?
2 changes
In September 2026, Workable gained share of searches among recruitment software brands worldwide, from 39.5% to 40.1%.
In September 2026, Greenhouse lost share of searches among recruitment software brands worldwide, from 4.3% to 2.9%.
How are branded searches counted?
2 search terms
Brandwave collects information about searches that people make online using Greenhouse’s and Workable’s names. When viewed over time, estimated search volumes for these branded terms can be used to understand whether interest in the brands is growing, holding steady, or fading.
Greenhouse
1 branded search term
- greenhouse ats
Workable
1 branded search term
- workable
Other head-to-heads among recruitment software brands
Put your own brand in this comparison
Brandwave tracks your branded demand next to the rival you actually watch, with your campaigns, spend and outcomes on the same timeline.