Photo culling software:Share of Search
Compare professional photo culling software, including AI-assisted selection and manual culling workflows, using worldwide demand for English language branded terms.
In August 2026, Evoto AI held 54.6% estimated Share of Search among photo culling software.
- Highest Share of Search
- 54.6%Evoto AI, August 2026
- Lead over 2nd
- 29.2 pointsEvoto AI over Aftershoot
- Estimated monthly branded searches
- 149Kacross 6 measured brands
- Brands compared
- 6worldwide
Share of SearchLeaderboard
Each brand’s estimated Share of Search among photo culling software in Aug 2026.
| Rank | Brand | Share of Search | Estimated monthly branded searches | vs prior month | Share change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1, held 1st | 54.6% | 81.6K | +0.82% | +1.8 points | |
| 2, held 2nd | 25.5% | 38K | +1.5% | +1 points | |
| 3, held 3rd | 11.8% | 17.6K | -19.1% | -2.4 points | |
| 4, held 4th | 4.8% | 7.2K | -10.8% | -0.4 points | |
| 5, held 5th | 2.2% | 3.2K | +0.31% | +0.1 points | |
| 6, held 6th | 1.2% | 1.7K | -2.3% | +0 points |
1.
Evoto AI
54.6%
held 1st · 81.6K estimated branded searches · +0.82% vs prior month · +1.8 points
25.5%
held 2nd · 38K estimated branded searches · +1.5% vs prior month · +1 points
11.8%
held 3rd · 17.6K estimated branded searches · -19.1% vs prior month · -2.4 points
4.8%
held 4th · 7.2K estimated branded searches · -10.8% vs prior month · -0.4 points
2.2%
held 5th · 3.2K estimated branded searches · +0.31% vs prior month · +0.1 points
1.2%
held 6th · 1.7K estimated branded searches · -2.3% vs prior month · +0 points
Compare two brands head-to-head
Share of Search by month for Evoto AI, Aftershoot, Photo Mechanic, Narrative, FilterPixel. The figures are in the table below the chart.
View monthly share of search table
| Month | Evoto AI | Aftershoot | Photo Mechanic | Narrative | FilterPixel | Imagen AI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 2025 | 47.1% | 28.2% | 15.4% | 5.1% | 2.2% | 2% |
| Oct 2025 | 46% | 28.7% | 15.8% | 5.3% | 2.5% | 1.7% |
| Nov 2025 | 50% | 25.8% | 14.3% | 5.7% | 2.5% | 1.8% |
| Dec 2025 | 54.8% | 21.7% | 14.6% | 5.2% | 2.1% | 1.5% |
| Jan 2026 | 55.8% | 18.4% | 14.8% | 7.5% | 1.9% | 1.6% |
| Feb 2026 | 52.2% | 19.5% | 15.8% | 9.1% | 2% | 1.4% |
| Mar 2026 | 55.1% | 20.7% | 14.2% | 6.6% | 2.2% | 1.3% |
| Apr 2026 | 56.3% | 22% | 12.5% | 5.7% | 2.3% | 1.2% |
| May 2026 | 54% | 24.3% | 11.7% | 4.7% | 1.7% | 3.5% |
| Jun 2026 | 52% | 24.4% | 14% | 5.7% | 2.1% | 1.9% |
| Jul 2026 | 52.8% | 24.5% | 14.2% | 5.2% | 2.1% | 1.2% |
| Aug 2026 | 54.6% | 25.5% | 11.8% | 4.8% | 2.2% | 1.2% |
What changed among photo culling software worldwide?
In August 2026, Evoto AI gained estimated Share of Search among photo culling software worldwide, from 52.8% to 54.6%.

In August 2026, Aftershoot gained estimated Share of Search among photo culling software worldwide, from 24.5% to 25.5%.

In August 2026, Photo Mechanic lost estimated Share of Search among photo culling software worldwide, from 14.2% to 11.8%.

Estimated monthly branded searches for Imagen AI worldwide fell 47.1% over 12 measured months, from 3.3K to 1.7K in August 2026.

Estimated monthly branded searches for Narrative worldwide fell 12.7% over 12 measured months, from 8.2K to 7.2K in August 2026.
Which brand has the highest Share of Search among photo culling software worldwide?
Evoto AI holds the highest estimated Share of Search among photo culling software worldwide, at 54.6% in August 2026. Aftershoot is in 2nd place, 29.2 percentage points behind at 25.5% Share of Search.
| Brand | Share of Search | Peak | Low | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 47.1% → 54.6% | 56.3% (Apr 2026) | 46% (Oct 2025) | 1st | |
| 28.2% → 25.5% | 28.7% (Oct 2025) | 18.4% (Jan 2026) | 2nd | |
| 15.4% → 11.8% | 15.8% (Oct 2025) | 11.7% (May 2026) | 3rd | |
| 5.1% → 4.8% | 9.1% (Feb 2026) | 4.7% (May 2026) | 4th | |
| 2.2% → 2.2% | 2.5% (Oct 2025) | 1.7% (May 2026) | 5th | |
| 2% → 1.2% | 3.5% (May 2026) | 1.2% (Jul 2026) | 6th |
Quote these findings
- Evoto AI holds the highest estimated Share of Search among photo culling software worldwide, at 54.6% in August 2026.
- Aftershoot is in 2nd place, 29.2 percentage points behind at 25.5% Share of Search.
- Across the 12 months ending August 2026, Evoto AI’s estimated Share of Search among photo culling software worldwide increased from 47.1% to 54.6%.
- Across the 12 months ending August 2026, Aftershoot’s estimated Share of Search among photo culling software worldwide decreased from 28.2% to 25.5%.
- Across the 12 months ending August 2026, Photo Mechanic’s estimated Share of Search among photo culling software worldwide decreased from 15.4% to 11.8%.
- Across the 12 months ending August 2026, Imagen AI’s estimated Share of Search among photo culling software worldwide decreased from 2% to 1.2%.
- Across the 12 months ending August 2026, Evoto AI’s estimated Share of Search among photo culling software worldwide peaked at 56.3% in April 2026 and was lowest at 46% in October 2025.
- Across the 12 months ending August 2026, Aftershoot’s estimated Share of Search among photo culling software worldwide peaked at 28.7% in October 2025 and was lowest at 18.4% in January 2026.
- Across the 12 months ending August 2026, Photo Mechanic’s estimated Share of Search among photo culling software worldwide peaked at 15.8% in October 2025 and was lowest at 11.7% in May 2026.
- Across the 12 months ending August 2026, Narrative’s estimated Share of Search among photo culling software worldwide peaked at 9.1% in February 2026 and was lowest at 4.7% in May 2026.
- Across the 12 months ending August 2026, Imagen AI’s estimated Share of Search among photo culling software worldwide peaked at 3.5% in May 2026 and was lowest at 1.2% in July 2026.
- Across the 12 months ending August 2026, Narrative and FilterPixel held steady: their estimated Share of Search among photo culling software worldwide each moved less than 0.5 percentage points.
Competitor brands
How is branded search demand measured?
Brandwave organizes categories, branded terms, and competitor groups using publicly available information about companies and brands. We obtain third-party modeled search-volume estimates from external search-data providers, then store and keep them up to date. Our Brand Demand Index shares this curated information with everyone for free. The figures cover the 12 months ending Aug 2026.
Brandwave tracks brand demand worldwide and by individual country because brands compete in different ways. For instance, global brands such as SaaS companies are compared worldwide, while retailers and local businesses are usually compared within their own country. Brands in the same competitor group are always measured using the same geographic area. This ensures that global demand is not compared with demand from only one country. Brandwave currently tracks branded terms in English. Global indexes include searches for these terms from every country, even if English is not the main language there. In this context, language refers to the terms being measured, not the language spoken by the people searching. Global and country estimates may overlap, so do not add them together.
We estimate branded-search demand worldwide for Aftershoot, Evoto AI, FilterPixel, Imagen AI, Narrative and Photo Mechanic using modeled search-volume estimates for each brand’s name or related terms. This approach has limitations, but it provides a directional view of relative branded-search interest and how it changes over time.
No, Share of Search compares a brand’s estimated search volume with the estimated search volume of other brands in the same group. It measures searches for branded terms, not purchases, so it is not the same as market share, revenue share, or customer share. A brand might have a high Share of Search but still sell less than a competitor, and brands that people buy out of habit might be searched for less than brands people are still considering. Branded-search demand can provide an early signal that interest in a brand is changing. Watching for sustained shifts can help you spot trends sooner, but the metric does not establish what will happen to revenue.
These numbers are estimates and should be seen as a general trend, not an exact count. The figures show rounded monthly search volumes, and a single month’s result might change for reasons unrelated to the brand. Smaller brands are rounded more roughly than larger ones. Search volume estimates searches, not unique people. The real value of these figures is in comparison: every brand in the group is measured the same way, in the same market, and in the same month. This means the differences between brands, and how those differences change over time, are more meaningful than any single number.
Not always. It depends on what your campaign was meant to do. Our public marketing data shows when branded search demand changes, but it doesn’t tell you why. Branded search volume can rise or fall for many reasons. For example, a competitor’s campaign, a news story, a price change, the season, or more people shopping in your category can all play a part. Checking the timing of these changes can give you useful clues, so it helps to see what else was happening at the same time. Brandwave lets you track all your marketing activity and branded search volume together on one timeline, making this much easier.
Yes. Anyone may use, share, adapt, and redistribute data published in the Brandwave Brand Demand Index, including for commercial purposes, under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International licence (CC BY 4.0). Give appropriate credit to Brandwave, link to the source page and https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, and indicate if you made changes. This permission covers Brandwave’s published compilation and measurements; it does not grant rights to third-party trademarks or logos. Automated access must use the public pages or API and respect published rate limits.
Not necessarily. Brandwave maintains these brand profiles using publicly available information and data sources. Brandwave never exposes private customer data publicly.

See your own brand in this picture
Brandwave tracks your branded demand next to your campaigns, spend and outcomes, so you can see what moved your numbers, not just that they moved.