Aftershoot vs Photo Mechanic:Share of Search
Twelve months of estimated branded-search demand and Share of Search for Aftershoot and Photo Mechanic worldwide, read against each other inside the photo culling software they both compete among.
In August 2026, Aftershoot led Photo Mechanic among photo culling software worldwide, with 25.5% estimated Share of Search against 11.8%.
- Aftershoot Share of Search
- 25.5%2nd of 6 in the set
- Photo Mechanic Share of Search
- 11.8%3rd of 6 in the set
- Gap
- 13.7 pointsAftershoot ahead of Photo Mechanic
- Estimated monthly branded searches
- 38K · 17.6KAftershoot · Photo Mechanic
Who is ahead, Aftershoot or Photo Mechanic?
See how Aftershoot and Photo Mechanic compare over the last 12 months.
Share of Search by month for Aftershoot, Photo Mechanic. The figures are in the table below the chart.
View monthly share of search table
| Month | Evoto AI | Aftershoot | Photo Mechanic | Narrative | FilterPixel | Imagen AI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 2025 | 47.1% | 28.2% | 15.4% | 5.1% | 2.2% | 2% |
| Oct 2025 | 46% | 28.7% | 15.8% | 5.3% | 2.5% | 1.7% |
| Nov 2025 | 50% | 25.8% | 14.3% | 5.7% | 2.5% | 1.8% |
| Dec 2025 | 54.8% | 21.7% | 14.6% | 5.2% | 2.1% | 1.5% |
| Jan 2026 | 55.8% | 18.4% | 14.8% | 7.5% | 1.9% | 1.6% |
| Feb 2026 | 52.2% | 19.5% | 15.8% | 9.1% | 2% | 1.4% |
| Mar 2026 | 55.1% | 20.7% | 14.2% | 6.6% | 2.2% | 1.3% |
| Apr 2026 | 56.3% | 22% | 12.5% | 5.7% | 2.3% | 1.2% |
| May 2026 | 54% | 24.3% | 11.7% | 4.7% | 1.7% | 3.5% |
| Jun 2026 | 52% | 24.4% | 14% | 5.7% | 2.1% | 1.9% |
| Jul 2026 | 52.8% | 24.5% | 14.2% | 5.2% | 2.1% | 1.2% |
| Aug 2026 | 54.6% | 25.5% | 11.8% | 4.8% | 2.2% | 1.2% |
How has the Aftershoot and Photo Mechanic comparison changed?
- Aftershoot was ahead of Photo Mechanic in every measured month of the 12 months ending August 2026.
- Across the 12 months ending August 2026, Aftershoot’s estimated Share of Search among photo culling software worldwide moved from 28.2% to 25.5%, and its estimated monthly branded searches from 45.5K to 38K.
- Across the 12 months ending August 2026, Photo Mechanic’s estimated Share of Search among photo culling software worldwide moved from 15.4% to 11.8%, and its estimated monthly branded searches from 24.8K to 17.6K.
What changed among photo culling software worldwide?

In August 2026, Aftershoot gained estimated Share of Search among photo culling software worldwide, from 24.5% to 25.5%.

In August 2026, Photo Mechanic lost estimated Share of Search among photo culling software worldwide, from 14.2% to 11.8%.
How each brand is measured
Brandwave uses third-party search volume data to identify the unique branded terms for each brand and adds up their estimated monthly searches. Different spellings of the same term are grouped together and only counted once. Distinct branded searches, including longer or more specific terms, are counted separately and included in the brand’s monthly total.
Aftershoot
- after shoot
- after shoot ai culling
- after shoot culling
- aftershoot
- aftershoot ai
- aftershoot ai culling
- aftershoot ai editing
- aftershoot culling
- aftershoot edit
- aftershoot editing
- aftershoot galleries
- aftershoot retouch
- aftershoot retouching
- aftershoot select
- aftershoot software
- aftershoot studio
- aftershoot.com
Photo Mechanic
- camera bits photo mechanic
- photo mechanic
- photo mechanic 5
- photo mechanic 6
- photo mechanic 6.0
- photo mechanic 7
- photo mechanic app
- photo mechanic culling
- photo mechanic for windows
- photo mechanic mac
- photo mechanic plus
- photo mechanic pro
- photo mechanic program
- photo mechanic software
- photomechanic
How is branded search demand measured?
In August 2026, Aftershoot led Photo Mechanic among photo culling software worldwide, with 25.5% estimated Share of Search against 11.8%.
Brandwave organizes categories, branded terms, and competitor groups using publicly available information about companies and brands. We obtain third-party modeled search-volume estimates from external search-data providers, then store and keep them up to date. Our Brand Demand Index shares this curated information with everyone for free. The figures cover the 12 months ending Aug 2026.
Brandwave tracks brand demand worldwide and by individual country because brands compete in different ways. For instance, global brands such as SaaS companies are compared worldwide, while retailers and local businesses are usually compared within their own country. Brands in the same competitor group are always measured using the same geographic area. This ensures that global demand is not compared with demand from only one country. Brandwave currently tracks branded terms in English. Global indexes include searches for these terms from every country, even if English is not the main language there. In this context, language refers to the terms being measured, not the language spoken by the people searching. Global and country estimates may overlap, so do not add them together.
We estimate branded-search demand worldwide for Aftershoot and Photo Mechanic using modeled search-volume estimates for each brand’s name or related terms. This approach has limitations, but it provides a directional view of relative branded-search interest and how it changes over time.
No, Share of Search compares a brand’s estimated search volume with the estimated search volume of other brands in the same group. It measures searches for branded terms, not purchases, so it is not the same as market share, revenue share, or customer share. A brand might have a high Share of Search but still sell less than a competitor, and brands that people buy out of habit might be searched for less than brands people are still considering. Branded-search demand can provide an early signal that interest in a brand is changing. Watching for sustained shifts can help you spot trends sooner, but the metric does not establish what will happen to revenue.
These numbers are estimates and should be seen as a general trend, not an exact count. The figures show rounded monthly search volumes, and a single month’s result might change for reasons unrelated to the brand. Smaller brands are rounded more roughly than larger ones. Search volume estimates searches, not unique people. The real value of these figures is in comparison: every brand in the group is measured the same way, in the same market, and in the same month. This means the differences between brands, and how those differences change over time, are more meaningful than any single number.
Not always. It depends on what your campaign was meant to do. Our public marketing data shows when branded search demand changes, but it doesn’t tell you why. Branded search volume can rise or fall for many reasons. For example, a competitor’s campaign, a news story, a price change, the season, or more people shopping in your category can all play a part. Checking the timing of these changes can give you useful clues, so it helps to see what else was happening at the same time. Brandwave lets you track all your marketing activity and branded search volume together on one timeline, making this much easier.
Yes. Anyone may use, share, adapt, and redistribute data published in the Brandwave Brand Demand Index, including for commercial purposes, under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International licence (CC BY 4.0). Give appropriate credit to Brandwave, link to the source page and https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, and indicate if you made changes. This permission covers Brandwave’s published compilation and measurements; it does not grant rights to third-party trademarks or logos. Automated access must use the public pages or API and respect published rate limits.
Not necessarily. Brandwave maintains these brand profiles using publicly available information and data sources. Brandwave never exposes private customer data publicly.

Put your own brand in this comparison
Brandwave tracks your branded demand next to the rival you actually watch, with your campaigns, spend and outcomes on the same timeline.