GiveSmart vs OneCause:Which is more popular?
In September 2026, OneCause had more branded searches than GiveSmart among charity auction software worldwide. OneCause had about 12,100 branded searches, while GiveSmart had 8,100. OneCause made up 10.8% of all charity auction software searches we track, and GiveSmart accounted for 7.2%. When we asked ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews about charity auction software, OneCause appeared in three of the five answers and GiveSmart in one. OneCause was mentioned before GiveSmart in three out of four answers that named either.
Who do people search for more?
OneCause, about 49% more searches than GiveSmart
Who does AI mention more?
OneCause, mentioned in 3 of 5 answers, GiveSmart in 1
Who does AI recommend more?
OneCause, named ahead of GiveSmart in 3 of 4 answers
Follow GiveSmart vs OneCause and get free monthly updates on what changed
By continuing you'll get index updates and occasional product news from Brandwave. Unsubscribe any time. Privacy
Top charity auction software in ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews
In three ChatGPT questions and two Google AI Overviews, OneCause was mentioned in three out of five: in all three ChatGPT answers, but not in either of the two Google AI Overviews. GiveSmart was mentioned in one out of five: not in any of the three ChatGPT answers, but in one of the two Google AI Overviews. OneCause was listed before GiveSmart in three out of four answers that named either.
Most recommended by AI
Brands get a higher ranking if they are mentioned earlier in the answers.
Givebutter1st
Auctria2nd- OneCause3rd
RallyUp4th
32auctions5th
GalaBid6th
Handbid7th
BiddingOwl8th
GiveSmart9th
Greater Giving–
Mentioned by AI
Each dot is one answer, filled in when that answer mentions the brand.
- Givebutter5 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 2 of 2 Google answers
- 32auctions4 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 2 of 2 Google answers
- Auctria4 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
- GalaBid4 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
- OneCause3 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
- Handbid3 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
- RallyUp2 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 2 of 2 Google answers
- BiddingOwl2 of 5Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
- GiveSmart1 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
- Greater Giving0 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
See every answer about charity auction software
5 answers
Asked ChatGPT
“Which charity auction software should I use?”
Asked ChatGPT
“What are the best silent auction software options for nonprofits?”
Asked ChatGPT
“What's the best auction software for a school fundraising gala?”
Searched Google, AI Overview
“silent auction software”
Searched Google, AI Overview
“online auction for nonprofits”
Not named in any answer:
Brands are shown in the order each answer named them. The survey took place in the United States on October 22, 2026.
Is GiveSmart or OneCause more popular in search?
This chart shows how often people search Google for GiveSmart and OneCause by name. Each line represents a brand's share of searches for all ten charity auction software we track, month by month, from English-language searches worldwide.
Share of searches by month for OneCause, GiveSmart. The figures are in the table below the chart.
View monthly share of searches table
| Month | Givebutter | OneCause | GiveSmart | 32auctions | Auctria | RallyUp | GalaBid | Greater Giving | BiddingOwl | Handbid |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 2025 | 47.9% | 11.7% | 9.6% | 5.2% | 6.4% | 6.4% | 4.3% | 4.3% | 2.9% | 1.3% |
| Nov 2025 | 46.2% | 9.2% | 9.2% | 9.2% | 6.2% | 6.2% | 5% | 3.4% | 4.1% | 1.2% |
| Dec 2025 | 56.6% | 7.5% | 7.5% | 7.5% | 4.1% | 6.2% | 3.3% | 2.7% | 3.3% | 1.1% |
| Jan 2026 | 50.8% | 10.2% | 10.2% | 5.5% | 6.8% | 5.5% | 3% | 4.5% | 1.9% | 1.6% |
| Feb 2026 | 46.6% | 11.4% | 9.3% | 6.2% | 7.6% | 6.2% | 3.4% | 5.1% | 2.7% | 1.5% |
| Mar 2026 | 46.5% | 11.4% | 9.3% | 6.2% | 7.6% | 6.2% | 3.4% | 5.1% | 2.8% | 1.5% |
| Apr 2026 | 47.5% | 11.6% | 7.8% | 7.8% | 7.8% | 5.2% | 3.5% | 5.2% | 2.3% | 1.5% |
| May 2026 | 51% | 10.2% | 8.3% | 6.8% | 5.6% | 5.6% | 4.5% | 4.5% | 2.5% | 1% |
| Jun 2026 | 58.6% | 9.6% | 6.4% | 5.2% | 4.3% | 5.2% | 4.3% | 3.4% | 2.2% | 0.85% |
| Jul 2026 | 56.4% | 9.2% | 7.5% | 6.1% | 4% | 6.1% | 4% | 3.3% | 2.2% | 1% |
| Aug 2026 | 54.9% | 11% | 7.3% | 6% | 4.9% | 6% | 4% | 3.2% | 1.8% | 0.98% |
| Sep 2026 | 54.1% | 10.8% | 7.2% | 5.9% | 5.9% | 5.9% | 3.9% | 3.9% | 1.4% | 0.89% |
How has the GiveSmart and OneCause comparison changed over the last 12 months?
3 findings
- OneCause was ahead of GiveSmart in every measured month of the 12 months ending September 2026.
- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, GiveSmart’s share of searches among charity auction software worldwide moved from 9.6% to 7.2%, and its estimated monthly branded searches moved from 12.1K to 8.1K.
- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, OneCause’s share of searches among charity auction software worldwide moved from 11.7% to 10.8%, and its estimated monthly branded searches moved from 14.8K to 12.1K.
How did search popularity change for charity auction software worldwide in September 2026?
2 changes
How are branded searches counted?
2 search terms
Brandwave collects information about searches that people make online using GiveSmart’s and OneCause’s names. When viewed over time, estimated search volumes for these branded terms can be used to understand whether interest in the brands is growing, holding steady, or fading.
Other head-to-heads among charity auction software
Put your own brand in this comparison
Brandwave tracks your branded demand next to the rival you actually watch, with your campaigns, spend and outcomes on the same timeline.