How popular isSpotBugs?
In September 2026, people searched for SpotBugs by name about 1,900 times worldwide, a 34.5% decrease from the previous year. These searches made up 0.78% of all global static analysis tool searches, placing SpotBugs tenth out of 14 tools. When we asked both ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews about static analysis tools, SpotBugs appeared in two of the five answers and was the sixth most recommended of the 14.
SpotBugs is the tenth most searched of 14 competitors and the sixth most recommended in AI answers.
SonarQubeShare of searches 45.3%Mentioned in 5 of 5 AI answersPlace in AI recommendations 1st
SemgrepShare of searches 13.6%Mentioned in 5 of 5 AI answersPlace in AI recommendations 2nd- ESLintShare of searches 11.2%Mentioned in 4 of 5 AI answersPlace in AI recommendations 4th
CheckmarxShare of searches 7.5%Mentioned in 1 of 5 AI answersPlace in AI recommendations 9th- SpotBugsShare of searches 0.78%Mentioned in 2 of 5 AI answersPlace in AI recommendations 6th
Follow SpotBugs and get free monthly updates on what changed
By continuing you'll get index updates and occasional product news from Brandwave. Unsubscribe any time. Privacy
Top static analysis tools in ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews
In three ChatGPT questions and two Google AI Overviews, SpotBugs was mentioned in two out of five: in one of the three ChatGPT answers and in one of the two Google AI Overviews. SpotBugs is the sixth most recommended of the 14.
Most recommended by AI
Brands get a higher ranking if they are mentioned earlier in the answers.
Mentioned by AI
Each dot is one answer, filled in when that answer mentions the brand.
SonarQube5 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 2 of 2 Google answers
Semgrep5 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 2 of 2 Google answers
CodeQL5 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 2 of 2 Google answers- ESLint4 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
Snyk Code3 of 5Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 2 of 2 Google answers- Coverity2 of 5Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
- Ruff2 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
- SpotBugs2 of 5Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
Checkmarx1 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
Veracode1 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
See every answer about static analysis tools
5 answers
Asked ChatGPT
“Which static analysis tool should I use?”
Asked ChatGPT
“What are the best static analysis tools?”
Asked ChatGPT
“What's the best static analysis tool for source code quality?”
Searched Google, AI Overview
“static analysis tools”
Searched Google, AI Overview
“code scanning tool”
Not named in any answer:
Brands are shown in the order each answer named them. The survey took place in the United States on October 21, 2026.
Which static analysis tools compete with SpotBugs?
Share of searches by month for SonarQube, Semgrep, ESLint, Checkmarx, CodeQL, Veracode, Coverity, Ruff, SpotBugs. The figures are in the table below the chart.
View monthly share of searches table
| Month | SonarQube | Semgrep | ESLint | Checkmarx | CodeQL | Veracode | Coverity | Ruff | Codacy | SpotBugs | Snyk Code | GitHub CodeQL | Code Climate | Black Duck Coverity |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 2025 | 49.5% | 8.1% | 14.8% | 6.7% | 4.4% | 5.4% | 3% | 3.1% | 2% | 0.87% | 0.74% | 0.39% | 0.87% | 0.12% |
| Nov 2025 | 48.4% | 8% | 14.5% | 6.5% | 5.3% | 5.3% | 3.6% | 3% | 2.4% | 0.86% | 0.7% | 0.47% | 0.86% | 0.09% |
| Dec 2025 | 50.1% | 8.2% | 15% | 6.7% | 4.5% | 4.5% | 3% | 3% | 2% | 0.89% | 0.72% | 0.48% | 0.71% | 0.1% |
| Jan 2026 | 47.5% | 9.5% | 14.3% | 6.4% | 5.2% | 5.2% | 3.5% | 3.5% | 1.9% | 0.85% | 0.68% | 0.46% | 0.85% | 0.11% |
| Feb 2026 | 46.6% | 9.4% | 17.1% | 6.2% | 5.1% | 5.1% | 2.8% | 2.9% | 1.9% | 0.66% | 0.84% | 0.45% | 0.83% | 0.11% |
| Mar 2026 | 49.8% | 10% | 12.2% | 8.2% | 4.5% | 4.5% | 3% | 3% | 1.6% | 0.73% | 1.1% | 0.48% | 0.73% | 0.12% |
| Apr 2026 | 45.8% | 11.2% | 11.2% | 11.2% | 5% | 5% | 2.8% | 2.8% | 1.8% | 0.82% | 1% | 0.44% | 0.65% | 0.11% |
| May 2026 | 48.4% | 11.9% | 11.9% | 8% | 5.3% | 5.3% | 2.4% | 2.9% | 1.6% | 0.68% | 0.69% | 0.47% | 0.57% | 0.09% |
| Jun 2026 | 49.9% | 12.2% | 10% | 6.7% | 5.5% | 5.5% | 3% | 3% | 1.6% | 0.7% | 0.71% | 0.48% | 0.59% | 0.12% |
| Jul 2026 | 44.8% | 13.5% | 11% | 7.4% | 6% | 6% | 3.3% | 3.3% | 1.8% | 0.77% | 0.79% | 0.53% | 0.53% | 0.16% |
| Aug 2026 | 47.7% | 11.7% | 11.7% | 7.8% | 5.2% | 5.2% | 2.9% | 3.6% | 1.6% | 0.69% | 0.71% | 0.56% | 0.43% | 0.11% |
| Sep 2026 | 45.3% | 13.6% | 11.2% | 7.5% | 6.1% | 5% | 4.1% | 3.3% | 1.5% | 0.78% | 0.67% | 0.54% | 0.41% | 0.13% |
| Rank | Brand | Share of searches | Estimated monthly branded searches | vs prior month | Share change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1, held 1st | 45.3% | 110K | 0% | -2.4 points | |
| 2, moved from 3rd to 2nd | 13.6% | 33.1K | +22.1% | +1.9 pointsmoved from 3rd to 2nd | |
| 3, moved from 2nd to 3rd | 11.2% | 27.1K | 0% | -0.6 pointsmoved from 2nd to 3rd | |
| 4, held 4th | 7.5% | 18.1K | 0% | -0.4 points | |
| 5, held 5th | 6.1% | 14.8K | +22.3% | +0.9 points | |
| 6, held 6th | 5% | 12.1K | 0% | -0.3 points | |
| 7, moved from 8th to 7th | 4.1% | 9.9K | +50% | +1.2 pointsmoved from 8th to 7th | |
| 8, moved from 7th to 8th | 3.3% | 7.9K | -3.7% | -0.3 pointsmoved from 7th to 8th | |
| 9, held 9th | 1.5% | 3.6K | 0% | -0.1 points | |
| 10, moved from 11th to 10th | 0.78% | 1.9K | +18.8% | +0.1 pointsmoved from 11th to 10th | |
| 11, moved from 10th to 11th | 0.67% | 1.6K | 0% | 0 pointsmoved from 10th to 11th | |
| 12, held 12th | 0.54% | 1.3K | 0% | 0 points | |
| 13, held 13th | 0.41% | 1K | 0% | 0 points | |
| 14, held 14th | 0.13% | 320 | +23.1% | 0 points |
45.3%
Held 1st. 110K estimated branded searches, 0% vs prior month. Share -2.4 points.
2.
Semgrep13.6%
Moved from 3rd to 2nd. 33.1K estimated branded searches, +22.1% vs prior month. Share +1.9 points.
3.ESLint
11.2%
Moved from 2nd to 3rd. 27.1K estimated branded searches, 0% vs prior month. Share -0.6 points.
7.5%
Held 4th. 18.1K estimated branded searches, 0% vs prior month. Share -0.4 points.
5.
CodeQL6.1%
Held 5th. 14.8K estimated branded searches, +22.3% vs prior month. Share +0.9 points.
6.
Veracode5%
Held 6th. 12.1K estimated branded searches, 0% vs prior month. Share -0.3 points.
7.Coverity
4.1%
Moved from 8th to 7th. 9.9K estimated branded searches, +50% vs prior month. Share +1.2 points.
8.Ruff
3.3%
Moved from 7th to 8th. 7.9K estimated branded searches, -3.7% vs prior month. Share -0.3 points.
9.
Codacy1.5%
Held 9th. 3.6K estimated branded searches, 0% vs prior month. Share -0.1 points.
10.SpotBugs
0.78%
Moved from 11th to 10th. 1.9K estimated branded searches, +18.8% vs prior month. Share +0.1 points.
11.
Snyk Code0.67%
Moved from 10th to 11th. 1.6K estimated branded searches, 0% vs prior month. Share 0 points.
0.54%
Held 12th. 1.3K estimated branded searches, 0% vs prior month. Share 0 points.
13.
Code Climate0.41%
Held 13th. 1K estimated branded searches, 0% vs prior month. Share 0 points.
0.13%
Held 14th. 320 estimated branded searches, +23.1% vs prior month. Share 0 points.
Compare popularity between SpotBugs and its closest rivals
Every comparison with SpotBugs
13 comparisons
How has branded search demand for SpotBugs changed worldwide over the last 12 months?
2 findings
- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, estimated monthly branded searches for SpotBugs worldwide fell from 2.9K to 1.9K.
- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, SpotBugs rose from 11th to 10th among static analysis tools worldwide.
How did search popularity change for static analysis tools worldwide in September 2026?
6 changes

In September 2026, Semgrep overtook ESLint to rank 2nd among static analysis tools worldwide, with 13.6% of the searches.
In September 2026, Coverity overtook Ruff to rank 7th among static analysis tools worldwide, with 4.1% of the searches.

In September 2026, CodeQL gained share of searches among static analysis tools worldwide, from 5.2% to 6.1%.

In September 2026, SonarQube lost share of searches among static analysis tools worldwide, from 47.7% to 45.3%.
In September 2026, ESLint lost share of searches among static analysis tools worldwide, from 11.7% to 11.2%.
In September 2026, SpotBugs rose from 11th to 10th among static analysis tools worldwide.
How are SpotBugs’ branded searches counted?
1 search term
Brandwave collects information about searches that people make online using SpotBugs’ name. When viewed over time, estimated search volumes for this branded term can be used to understand whether interest in the brand is growing, holding steady, or fading.
- spotbugs
Do you work for SpotBugs? To request corrections or removal please contact us via our support page and we will be happy to assist.

Is SpotBugs your brand?
Put your own campaigns, spend and outcomes next to this demand line, so you can see which of your marketing lined up with the movements above.