Brandwave

SpotBugs vs Veracode:Which is more popular?

In September 2026, Veracode had more branded searches than SpotBugs among static analysis tools worldwide. Veracode had about 12,100 branded searches, while SpotBugs had 1,900. Veracode made up 5% of all static analysis tool searches we track, and SpotBugs accounted for 0.78%. When we asked ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews about static analysis tools, SpotBugs appeared in two of the five answers and Veracode in one. SpotBugs was mentioned before Veracode in every answer that named either.

Among static analysis tools worldwide in September 2026

Who do people search for more?

Veracode, about 6 searches for every 1 for SpotBugs

Veracode 12.1K searchesSpotBugs 1.9K searches

Who does AI mention more?

SpotBugs, mentioned in 2 of 5 answers, Veracode in 1

SpotBugs in 2 of 5Veracode in 1 of 5

Who does AI recommend more?

SpotBugs, named ahead of Veracode in 2 of 2 answers

SpotBugs first in 2Veracode never first

Follow SpotBugs vs Veracode and get free monthly updates on what changed

By continuing you'll get index updates and occasional product news from Brandwave. Unsubscribe any time. Privacy

Track your brand against a rival →

Top static analysis tools in ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews

In three ChatGPT questions and two Google AI Overviews, SpotBugs was mentioned in two out of five: in one of the three ChatGPT answers and in one of the two Google AI Overviews. Veracode was mentioned in one out of five: not in any of the three ChatGPT answers, but in one of the two Google AI Overviews. SpotBugs was listed before Veracode in every answer that named either.

Most recommended by AI

Brands get a higher ranking if they are mentioned earlier in the answers.

  1. SonarQube1st
  2. Semgrep2nd
  3. CodeQL3rd
  4. ESLint4th
  5. Snyk Code5th
  6. SpotBugs6th
  7. Coverity7th
  8. Ruff8th
  9. Checkmarx9th
  10. Veracode10th
  11. +4 more

Mentioned by AI

Each dot is one answer, filled in when that answer mentions the brand.

  • SonarQube5 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 2 of 2 Google answers
  • Semgrep5 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 2 of 2 Google answers
  • CodeQL5 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 2 of 2 Google answers
  • ESLint4 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
  • Snyk Code3 of 5Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 2 of 2 Google answers
  • Coverity2 of 5Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
  • Ruff2 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
  • SpotBugs2 of 5Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
  • Checkmarx1 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
  • Veracode1 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers

+4 more

See every answer about static analysis tools

5 answers

Brands are shown in the order each answer named them. The survey took place in the United States on October 21, 2026.

Is SpotBugs or Veracode more popular in search?

This chart shows how often people search Google for SpotBugs and Veracode by name. Each line represents a brand's share of searches for all 14 static analysis tools we track, month by month, from English-language searches worldwide.

SpotBugs and Veracode among static analysis tools worldwide, by month

Share of searches by month for Veracode, SpotBugs. The figures are in the table below the chart.

View monthly share of searches table
MonthSonarQubeSemgrepESLintCheckmarxCodeQLVeracodeCoverityRuffCodacySpotBugsSnyk CodeGitHub CodeQLCode ClimateBlack Duck Coverity
Oct 202549.5%8.1%14.8%6.7%4.4%5.4%3%3.1%2%0.87%0.74%0.39%0.87%0.12%
Nov 202548.4%8%14.5%6.5%5.3%5.3%3.6%3%2.4%0.86%0.7%0.47%0.86%0.09%
Dec 202550.1%8.2%15%6.7%4.5%4.5%3%3%2%0.89%0.72%0.48%0.71%0.1%
Jan 202647.5%9.5%14.3%6.4%5.2%5.2%3.5%3.5%1.9%0.85%0.68%0.46%0.85%0.11%
Feb 202646.6%9.4%17.1%6.2%5.1%5.1%2.8%2.9%1.9%0.66%0.84%0.45%0.83%0.11%
Mar 202649.8%10%12.2%8.2%4.5%4.5%3%3%1.6%0.73%1.1%0.48%0.73%0.12%
Apr 202645.8%11.2%11.2%11.2%5%5%2.8%2.8%1.8%0.82%1%0.44%0.65%0.11%
May 202648.4%11.9%11.9%8%5.3%5.3%2.4%2.9%1.6%0.68%0.69%0.47%0.57%0.09%
Jun 202649.9%12.2%10%6.7%5.5%5.5%3%3%1.6%0.7%0.71%0.48%0.59%0.12%
Jul 202644.8%13.5%11%7.4%6%6%3.3%3.3%1.8%0.77%0.79%0.53%0.53%0.16%
Aug 202647.7%11.7%11.7%7.8%5.2%5.2%2.9%3.6%1.6%0.69%0.71%0.56%0.43%0.11%
Sep 202645.3%13.6%11.2%7.5%6.1%5%4.1%3.3%1.5%0.78%0.67%0.54%0.41%0.13%

How has the SpotBugs and Veracode comparison changed over the last 12 months?

3 findings
  • Veracode was ahead of SpotBugs in every measured month of the 12 months ending September 2026.
  • Across the 12 months ending September 2026, SpotBugs’ share of searches among static analysis tools worldwide moved from 0.87% to 0.78%, and its estimated monthly branded searches moved from 2.9K to 1.9K.
  • Across the 12 months ending September 2026, Veracode’s share of searches among static analysis tools worldwide moved from 5.4% to 5%, and its estimated monthly branded searches moved from 18.1K to 12.1K.

How did search popularity change for static analysis tools worldwide in September 2026?

2 changes
  1. In September 2026, SpotBugs rose from 11th to 10th among static analysis tools worldwide.

  2. Estimated monthly branded searches for Veracode worldwide fell 33.1% over 12 measured months, from 18.1K to 12.1K in September 2026.

How are branded searches counted?

2 search terms

Brandwave collects information about searches that people make online using SpotBugs’ and Veracode’s names. When viewed over time, estimated search volumes for these branded terms can be used to understand whether interest in the brands is growing, holding steady, or fading.

SpotBugs

1 branded search term

  • spotbugs

Veracode

1 branded search term

  • veracode

How the Brand Demand Index is measured

Other head-to-heads among static analysis tools

Creator with pink hair and a pink jacket

Put your own brand in this comparison

Brandwave tracks your branded demand next to the rival you actually watch, with your campaigns, spend and outcomes on the same timeline.