How popular isBlack Duck Coverity?
In September 2026, people searched for Black Duck Coverity by name about 320 times worldwide, a 17.9% decrease from the previous year. These searches made up 0.13% of all global static analysis tool searches, placing Black Duck Coverity 14th out of 14 tools. When we asked both ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews about static analysis tools, Black Duck Coverity did not appear in any of the answers.
Black Duck Coverity is the 14th most searched of 14 competitors and not listed in any AI answer.
SonarQubeShare of searches 45.3%Mentioned in 5 of 5 AI answersPlace in AI recommendations 1st
SemgrepShare of searches 13.6%Mentioned in 5 of 5 AI answersPlace in AI recommendations 2nd- ESLintShare of searches 11.2%Mentioned in 4 of 5 AI answersPlace in AI recommendations 4th
CheckmarxShare of searches 7.5%Mentioned in 1 of 5 AI answersPlace in AI recommendations 9th- Black Duck CoverityShare of searches 0.13%Mentioned in 0 of 5 AI answersPlace in AI recommendations –
Follow Black Duck Coverity and get free monthly updates on what changed
By continuing you'll get index updates and occasional product news from Brandwave. Unsubscribe any time. Privacy
Top static analysis tools in ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews
In three ChatGPT questions and two Google AI Overviews, Black Duck Coverity did not appear in any of the five answers.
Most recommended by AI
Brands get a higher ranking if they are mentioned earlier in the answers.
Mentioned by AI
Each dot is one answer, filled in when that answer mentions the brand.
SonarQube5 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 2 of 2 Google answers
Semgrep5 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 2 of 2 Google answers
CodeQL5 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 2 of 2 Google answers- ESLint4 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
Snyk Code3 of 5Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 2 of 2 Google answers- Coverity2 of 5Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
- Ruff2 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
- SpotBugs2 of 5Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
Checkmarx1 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers- Black Duck Coverity0 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
See every answer about static analysis tools
5 answers
Asked ChatGPT
“Which static analysis tool should I use?”
Asked ChatGPT
“What are the best static analysis tools?”
Asked ChatGPT
“What's the best static analysis tool for source code quality?”
Searched Google, AI Overview
“static analysis tools”
Searched Google, AI Overview
“code scanning tool”
Not named in any answer:
Brands are shown in the order each answer named them. The survey took place in the United States on October 21, 2026.
Which static analysis tools compete with Black Duck Coverity?
Share of searches by month for SonarQube, Semgrep, ESLint, Checkmarx, CodeQL, Veracode, Coverity, Ruff, Black Duck Coverity. The figures are in the table below the chart.
View monthly share of searches table
| Month | SonarQube | Semgrep | ESLint | Checkmarx | CodeQL | Veracode | Coverity | Ruff | Codacy | SpotBugs | Snyk Code | GitHub CodeQL | Code Climate | Black Duck Coverity |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 2025 | 49.5% | 8.1% | 14.8% | 6.7% | 4.4% | 5.4% | 3% | 3.1% | 2% | 0.87% | 0.74% | 0.39% | 0.87% | 0.12% |
| Nov 2025 | 48.4% | 8% | 14.5% | 6.5% | 5.3% | 5.3% | 3.6% | 3% | 2.4% | 0.86% | 0.7% | 0.47% | 0.86% | 0.09% |
| Dec 2025 | 50.1% | 8.2% | 15% | 6.7% | 4.5% | 4.5% | 3% | 3% | 2% | 0.89% | 0.72% | 0.48% | 0.71% | 0.1% |
| Jan 2026 | 47.5% | 9.5% | 14.3% | 6.4% | 5.2% | 5.2% | 3.5% | 3.5% | 1.9% | 0.85% | 0.68% | 0.46% | 0.85% | 0.11% |
| Feb 2026 | 46.6% | 9.4% | 17.1% | 6.2% | 5.1% | 5.1% | 2.8% | 2.9% | 1.9% | 0.66% | 0.84% | 0.45% | 0.83% | 0.11% |
| Mar 2026 | 49.8% | 10% | 12.2% | 8.2% | 4.5% | 4.5% | 3% | 3% | 1.6% | 0.73% | 1.1% | 0.48% | 0.73% | 0.12% |
| Apr 2026 | 45.8% | 11.2% | 11.2% | 11.2% | 5% | 5% | 2.8% | 2.8% | 1.8% | 0.82% | 1% | 0.44% | 0.65% | 0.11% |
| May 2026 | 48.4% | 11.9% | 11.9% | 8% | 5.3% | 5.3% | 2.4% | 2.9% | 1.6% | 0.68% | 0.69% | 0.47% | 0.57% | 0.09% |
| Jun 2026 | 49.9% | 12.2% | 10% | 6.7% | 5.5% | 5.5% | 3% | 3% | 1.6% | 0.7% | 0.71% | 0.48% | 0.59% | 0.12% |
| Jul 2026 | 44.8% | 13.5% | 11% | 7.4% | 6% | 6% | 3.3% | 3.3% | 1.8% | 0.77% | 0.79% | 0.53% | 0.53% | 0.16% |
| Aug 2026 | 47.7% | 11.7% | 11.7% | 7.8% | 5.2% | 5.2% | 2.9% | 3.6% | 1.6% | 0.69% | 0.71% | 0.56% | 0.43% | 0.11% |
| Sep 2026 | 45.3% | 13.6% | 11.2% | 7.5% | 6.1% | 5% | 4.1% | 3.3% | 1.5% | 0.78% | 0.67% | 0.54% | 0.41% | 0.13% |
| Rank | Brand | Share of searches | Estimated monthly branded searches | vs prior month | Share change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1, held 1st | 45.3% | 110K | 0% | -2.4 points | |
| 2, moved from 3rd to 2nd | 13.6% | 33.1K | +22.1% | +1.9 pointsmoved from 3rd to 2nd | |
| 3, moved from 2nd to 3rd | 11.2% | 27.1K | 0% | -0.6 pointsmoved from 2nd to 3rd | |
| 4, held 4th | 7.5% | 18.1K | 0% | -0.4 points | |
| 5, held 5th | 6.1% | 14.8K | +22.3% | +0.9 points | |
| 6, held 6th | 5% | 12.1K | 0% | -0.3 points | |
| 7, moved from 8th to 7th | 4.1% | 9.9K | +50% | +1.2 pointsmoved from 8th to 7th | |
| 8, moved from 7th to 8th | 3.3% | 7.9K | -3.7% | -0.3 pointsmoved from 7th to 8th | |
| 9, held 9th | 1.5% | 3.6K | 0% | -0.1 points | |
| 10, moved from 11th to 10th | 0.78% | 1.9K | +18.8% | +0.1 pointsmoved from 11th to 10th | |
| 11, moved from 10th to 11th | 0.67% | 1.6K | 0% | 0 pointsmoved from 10th to 11th | |
| 12, held 12th | 0.54% | 1.3K | 0% | 0 points | |
| 13, held 13th | 0.41% | 1K | 0% | 0 points | |
| 14, held 14th | 0.13% | 320 | +23.1% | 0 points |
45.3%
Held 1st. 110K estimated branded searches, 0% vs prior month. Share -2.4 points.
2.
Semgrep13.6%
Moved from 3rd to 2nd. 33.1K estimated branded searches, +22.1% vs prior month. Share +1.9 points.
3.ESLint
11.2%
Moved from 2nd to 3rd. 27.1K estimated branded searches, 0% vs prior month. Share -0.6 points.
7.5%
Held 4th. 18.1K estimated branded searches, 0% vs prior month. Share -0.4 points.
5.
CodeQL6.1%
Held 5th. 14.8K estimated branded searches, +22.3% vs prior month. Share +0.9 points.
6.
Veracode5%
Held 6th. 12.1K estimated branded searches, 0% vs prior month. Share -0.3 points.
7.Coverity
4.1%
Moved from 8th to 7th. 9.9K estimated branded searches, +50% vs prior month. Share +1.2 points.
8.Ruff
3.3%
Moved from 7th to 8th. 7.9K estimated branded searches, -3.7% vs prior month. Share -0.3 points.
9.
Codacy1.5%
Held 9th. 3.6K estimated branded searches, 0% vs prior month. Share -0.1 points.
10.SpotBugs
0.78%
Moved from 11th to 10th. 1.9K estimated branded searches, +18.8% vs prior month. Share +0.1 points.
11.
Snyk Code0.67%
Moved from 10th to 11th. 1.6K estimated branded searches, 0% vs prior month. Share 0 points.
0.54%
Held 12th. 1.3K estimated branded searches, 0% vs prior month. Share 0 points.
13.
Code Climate0.41%
Held 13th. 1K estimated branded searches, 0% vs prior month. Share 0 points.
0.13%
Held 14th. 320 estimated branded searches, +23.1% vs prior month. Share 0 points.
Compare popularity between Black Duck Coverity and its closest rivals
Black Duck Coverity vs Codacy: compare popularity- Black Duck Coverity vs SpotBugs: compare popularity
Black Duck Coverity vs Snyk Code: compare popularity- Black Duck Coverity vs GitHub CodeQL: compare popularity
Black Duck Coverity vs Code Climate: compare popularity- Compare Black Duck Coverity with any brand
Every comparison with Black Duck Coverity
13 comparisons
- Black Duck Coverity vs Checkmarx
- Black Duck Coverity vs Codacy
- Black Duck Coverity vs Code Climate
- Black Duck Coverity vs CodeQL
- Black Duck Coverity vs Coverity
- Black Duck Coverity vs ESLint
- Black Duck Coverity vs GitHub CodeQL
- Black Duck Coverity vs Ruff
- Black Duck Coverity vs Semgrep
- Black Duck Coverity vs Snyk Code
- Black Duck Coverity vs SonarQube
- Black Duck Coverity vs SpotBugs
- Black Duck Coverity vs Veracode
How has branded search demand for Black Duck Coverity changed worldwide over the last 12 months?
2 findings
- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, estimated monthly branded searches for Black Duck Coverity worldwide fell from 390 to 320.
- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, Black Duck Coverity’s share of searches among static analysis tools worldwide held steady, from 0.12% to 0.13%.
How did search popularity change for static analysis tools worldwide in September 2026?
6 changes

In September 2026, Semgrep overtook ESLint to rank 2nd among static analysis tools worldwide, with 13.6% of the searches.
In September 2026, Coverity overtook Ruff to rank 7th among static analysis tools worldwide, with 4.1% of the searches.

In September 2026, CodeQL gained share of searches among static analysis tools worldwide, from 5.2% to 6.1%.

In September 2026, SonarQube lost share of searches among static analysis tools worldwide, from 47.7% to 45.3%.
In September 2026, ESLint lost share of searches among static analysis tools worldwide, from 11.7% to 11.2%.
In September 2026, SpotBugs rose from 11th to 10th among static analysis tools worldwide.
How are Black Duck Coverity’s branded searches counted?
1 search term
Brandwave collects information about searches that people make online using Black Duck Coverity’s name. When viewed over time, estimated search volumes for this branded term can be used to understand whether interest in the brand is growing, holding steady, or fading.
- black duck coverity
Who owns Black Duck Coverity?
Black Duck Coverity is owned by Black Duck Software. Brandwave also tracks Black Duck, owned by the same company, worldwide.
Do you work for Black Duck Coverity? To request corrections or removal please contact us via our support page and we will be happy to assist.

Is Black Duck Coverity your brand?
Put your own campaigns, spend and outcomes next to this demand line, so you can see which of your marketing lined up with the movements above.