How popular isBlack Duck?
In September 2026, people searched for Black Duck by name about 1,440 times worldwide, about the same as the previous year. These searches made up 0.98% of all global dependency scanning tool searches, placing Black Duck ninth out of 11 tools. When we asked both ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews about dependency scanning tools, Black Duck appeared in two of the five answers and was the ninth most recommended of the 11.
Black Duck is the ninth most searched of 11 competitors and the ninth most recommended in AI answers.
SnykShare of searches 33.9%Mentioned in 3 of 5 AI answersPlace in AI recommendations 3rd
TrivyShare of searches 27.7%Mentioned in 4 of 5 AI answersPlace in AI recommendations 1st
DependabotShare of searches 15.2%Mentioned in 4 of 5 AI answersPlace in AI recommendations 2nd
OWASP Dependency-TrackShare of searches 6.8%Mentioned in 1 of 5 AI answersPlace in AI recommendations 10th
Black DuckShare of searches 0.98%Mentioned in 2 of 5 AI answersPlace in AI recommendations 9th
Follow Black Duck and get free monthly updates on what changed
By continuing you'll get index updates and occasional product news from Brandwave. Unsubscribe any time. Privacy
Top dependency scanning tools in ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews
In three ChatGPT questions and two Google AI Overviews, Black Duck was mentioned in two out of five: in two of the three ChatGPT answers, but not in either of the two Google AI Overviews. Black Duck is the ninth most recommended of the 11.
Most recommended by AI
Brands get a higher ranking if they are mentioned earlier in the answers.
Trivy1st
Dependabot2nd
Snyk3rd
OWASP Dependency-Check4th
Socket5th
Sonatype6th
Renovate7th
Mend8th
Black Duck9th
OWASP Dependency-Track10th- +1 more
Mentioned by AI
Each dot is one answer, filled in when that answer mentions the brand.
Trivy4 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 2 of 2 Google answers
Dependabot4 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
Snyk3 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
OWASP Dependency-Check3 of 5Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 2 of 2 Google answers
Sonatype2 of 5Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
Renovate2 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
Socket2 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
Black Duck2 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
Mend2 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
OWASP Dependency-Track1 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
See every answer about dependency scanning tools
5 answers
Asked ChatGPT
“Which dependency scanning tool should I use?”
Asked ChatGPT
“What are the best dependency scanning tools?”
Asked ChatGPT
“What's the best dependency scanning tool for a software team?”
Searched Google, AI Overview
“dependency scanning tools”
Searched Google, AI Overview
“open source dependency scanner”
Not named in any answer:
Brands are shown in the order each answer named them. The survey took place in the United States on October 20, 2026.
Which dependency scanning tools compete with Black Duck?
Share of searches by month for Snyk, Trivy, Dependabot, OWASP Dependency-Track, Sonatype, Renovate, OWASP Dependency-Check, Black Duck. The figures are in the table below the chart.
View monthly share of searches table
| Month | Snyk | Trivy | Dependabot | OWASP Dependency-Track | Sonatype | Renovate | OWASP Dependency-Check | Socket | Black Duck | Mend | FOSSA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 2025 | 43.6% | 19.5% | 13% | 5.8% | 7.1% | 3.2% | 4.8% | 1.2% | 1.1% | 0.72% | <0.01% |
| Nov 2025 | 40.2% | 22% | 12% | 6.6% | 8% | 3.6% | 4.4% | 1.3% | 0.98% | 0.81% | <0.01% |
| Dec 2025 | 39.8% | 21.8% | 14.5% | 6.5% | 6.5% | 3.5% | 4.3% | 1.2% | 1.1% | 0.8% | <0.01% |
| Jan 2026 | 39.2% | 21.5% | 14.3% | 6.4% | 7.8% | 3.5% | 4.3% | 1.1% | 1% | 0.79% | <0.01% |
| Feb 2026 | 44% | 19.7% | 13.2% | 5.9% | 7.2% | 3.9% | 3.2% | 1.2% | 0.95% | 0.73% | <0.01% |
| Mar 2026 | 26.3% | 47.7% | 9.6% | 4.3% | 4.3% | 2.9% | 2.3% | 1.4% | 0.76% | 0.43% | <0.01% |
| Apr 2026 | 35.6% | 29.2% | 13.1% | 5.8% | 5.8% | 3.2% | 3.2% | 2.4% | 0.94% | 0.77% | <0.01% |
| May 2026 | 39% | 21.3% | 14.3% | 6.4% | 6.4% | 3.5% | 2.8% | 4.6% | 0.93% | 0.64% | <0.01% |
| Jun 2026 | 39.8% | 21.8% | 14.6% | 6.5% | 6.5% | 3.6% | 3.6% | 2.1% | 0.95% | 0.58% | <0.01% |
| Jul 2026 | 35.4% | 23.7% | 15.9% | 7.1% | 7.1% | 3.9% | 3.1% | 1.9% | 1.3% | 0.72% | <0.01% |
| Aug 2026 | 33.8% | 27.6% | 15.1% | 5.5% | 6.8% | 3.7% | 2.5% | 3.3% | 0.98% | 0.68% | <0.01% |
| Sep 2026 | 33.9% | 27.7% | 15.2% | 6.8% | 6.8% | 3.7% | 2.5% | 2% | 0.98% | 0.6% | <0.01% |
| Rank | Brand | Share of searches | Estimated monthly branded searches | vs prior month | Share change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1, held 1st | 33.9% | 49.5K | 0% | +0.1 points | |
| 2, held 2nd | 27.7% | 40.5K | 0% | +0.1 points | |
| 3, held 3rd | 15.2% | 22.2K | 0% | 0 points | |
| 4, moved from 5th to 4th | 6.8% | 9.9K | +22.2% | +1.2 pointsmoved from 5th to 4th | |
| 5, moved from 4th to 5th | 6.8% | 9.9K | 0% | 0 pointsmoved from 4th to 5th | |
| 6, held 6th | 3.7% | 5.4K | 0% | 0 points | |
| 7, moved from 8th to 7th | 2.5% | 3.6K | 0% | 0 pointsmoved from 8th to 7th | |
| 8, moved from 7th to 8th | 2% | 2.9K | -40.8% | -1.4 pointsmoved from 7th to 8th | |
| 9, held 9th | 0.98% | 1.4K | 0% | 0 points | |
| 10, held 10th | 0.6% | 880 | -12% | -0.1 points | |
| 11, held 11th | <0.01% | 10 | 0% | 0 points |
1.
Snyk33.9%
Held 1st. 49.5K estimated branded searches, 0% vs prior month. Share +0.1 points.
2.
Trivy27.7%
Held 2nd. 40.5K estimated branded searches, 0% vs prior month. Share +0.1 points.
15.2%
Held 3rd. 22.2K estimated branded searches, 0% vs prior month. Share 0 points.
6.8%
Moved from 5th to 4th. 9.9K estimated branded searches, +22.2% vs prior month. Share +1.2 points.
5.
Sonatype6.8%
Moved from 4th to 5th. 9.9K estimated branded searches, 0% vs prior month. Share 0 points.
6.
Renovate3.7%
Held 6th. 5.4K estimated branded searches, 0% vs prior month. Share 0 points.
2.5%
Moved from 8th to 7th. 3.6K estimated branded searches, 0% vs prior month. Share 0 points.
8.
Socket2%
Moved from 7th to 8th. 2.9K estimated branded searches, -40.8% vs prior month. Share -1.4 points.
0.98%
Held 9th. 1.4K estimated branded searches, 0% vs prior month. Share 0 points.
10.
Mend0.6%
Held 10th. 880 estimated branded searches, -12% vs prior month. Share -0.1 points.
11.
FOSSA<0.01%
Held 11th. 10 estimated branded searches, 0% vs prior month. Share 0 points.
Compare popularity between Black Duck and its closest rivals
Every comparison with Black Duck
14 comparisons
- Anchore vs Black Duck
- Black Duck vs CycloneDX
- Black Duck vs Dependabot
- Black Duck vs JFrog Xray
- Black Duck vs OWASP Dependency-Check
- Black Duck vs OWASP Dependency-Track
- Black Duck vs Renovate
- Black Duck vs Snyk
- Black Duck vs Socket
- Black Duck vs Sonatype
- Black Duck vs Syft
- Black Duck vs Trivy
- Black Duck vs Mend
- Black Duck vs Cybeats
How has branded search demand for Black Duck changed worldwide over the last 12 months?
2 findings
- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, estimated monthly branded searches for Black Duck worldwide held steady, from 1.5K to 1.4K.
- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, Black Duck’s share of searches among dependency scanning tools worldwide held steady, from 1.1% to 0.98%.
How did search popularity change for dependency scanning tools worldwide in September 2026?
6 changes

In September 2026, OWASP Dependency-Track overtook Sonatype to rank 4th among dependency scanning tools worldwide, with 6.8% of the searches.

In September 2026, Socket lost share of searches among dependency scanning tools worldwide, from 3.3% to 2%.

Trivy’s share of searches among dependency scanning tools worldwide has gained ground for 3 months in a row, from 21.8% to 27.7% in September 2026.

In September 2026, OWASP Dependency-Check rose from 8th to 7th among dependency scanning tools worldwide.

Estimated monthly branded searches for Renovate worldwide rose 22.7% over 12 measured months, from 4.4K to 5.4K in September 2026.

Estimated monthly branded searches for Dependabot worldwide rose 22.7% over 12 measured months, from 18.1K to 22.2K in September 2026.
How are Black Duck’s branded searches counted?
2 search terms
Brandwave collects information about searches that people make online using Black Duck’s name. When viewed over time, estimated search volumes for these branded terms can be used to understand whether interest in the brand is growing, holding steady, or fading.
- black duck sca
- synopsys black duck
Do you work for Black Duck? To request corrections or removal please contact us via our support page and we will be happy to assist.
Where does Black Duck compete?
| Competitor set | Rank | Share of searches | Ranking |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dependency scanning tools | 9th of 11 | 0.98% | Shown above |
| SBOM platforms | 7th of 10 | 1.6% | Show ranking |

Is Black Duck your brand?
Put your own campaigns, spend and outcomes next to this demand line, so you can see which of your marketing lined up with the movements above.