Black Duck vs Socket:Which is more popular?
In September 2026, Socket had more branded searches than Black Duck among dependency scanning tools worldwide. Socket had about 2,900 branded searches, while Black Duck had 1,440. Socket made up 2% of all dependency scanning tool searches we track, and Black Duck accounted for 0.98%. When we asked ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews about dependency scanning tools, Black Duck and Socket each appeared in two of the five answers. Socket was mentioned before Black Duck in two out of three answers that named either.
Who do people search for more?
Socket, about 2 searches for every 1 for Black Duck
Who does AI mention more?
Both were mentioned in 2 of 5 answers.
Who does AI recommend more?
Socket, named ahead of Black Duck in 2 of 3 answers
Follow Black Duck vs Socket and get free monthly updates on what changed
By continuing you'll get index updates and occasional product news from Brandwave. Unsubscribe any time. Privacy
Top dependency scanning tools in ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews
In three ChatGPT questions and two Google AI Overviews, Black Duck and Socket were each mentioned in two out of five: in two of the three ChatGPT answers, but not in either of the two Google AI Overviews. Socket was listed before Black Duck in two out of three answers that named either.
Most recommended by AI
Brands get a higher ranking if they are mentioned earlier in the answers.
Trivy1st
Dependabot2nd
Snyk3rd
OWASP Dependency-Check4th
Socket5th
Sonatype6th
Renovate7th
Mend8th
Black Duck9th
OWASP Dependency-Track10th- +1 more
Mentioned by AI
Each dot is one answer, filled in when that answer mentions the brand.
Trivy4 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 2 of 2 Google answers
Dependabot4 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
Snyk3 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
OWASP Dependency-Check3 of 5Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 2 of 2 Google answers
Sonatype2 of 5Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
Renovate2 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
Socket2 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
Black Duck2 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
Mend2 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
OWASP Dependency-Track1 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
See every answer about dependency scanning tools
5 answers
Asked ChatGPT
“Which dependency scanning tool should I use?”
Asked ChatGPT
“What are the best dependency scanning tools?”
Asked ChatGPT
“What's the best dependency scanning tool for a software team?”
Searched Google, AI Overview
“dependency scanning tools”
Searched Google, AI Overview
“open source dependency scanner”
Not named in any answer:
Brands are shown in the order each answer named them. The survey took place in the United States on October 20, 2026.
Is Black Duck or Socket more popular in search?
This chart shows how often people search Google for Black Duck and Socket by name. Each line represents a brand's share of searches for all 11 dependency scanning tools we track, month by month, from English-language searches worldwide.
Share of searches by month for Socket, Black Duck. The figures are in the table below the chart.
View monthly share of searches table
| Month | Snyk | Trivy | Dependabot | OWASP Dependency-Track | Sonatype | Renovate | OWASP Dependency-Check | Socket | Black Duck | Mend | FOSSA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 2025 | 43.6% | 19.5% | 13% | 5.8% | 7.1% | 3.2% | 4.8% | 1.2% | 1.1% | 0.72% | <0.01% |
| Nov 2025 | 40.2% | 22% | 12% | 6.6% | 8% | 3.6% | 4.4% | 1.3% | 0.98% | 0.81% | <0.01% |
| Dec 2025 | 39.8% | 21.8% | 14.5% | 6.5% | 6.5% | 3.5% | 4.3% | 1.2% | 1.1% | 0.8% | <0.01% |
| Jan 2026 | 39.2% | 21.5% | 14.3% | 6.4% | 7.8% | 3.5% | 4.3% | 1.1% | 1% | 0.79% | <0.01% |
| Feb 2026 | 44% | 19.7% | 13.2% | 5.9% | 7.2% | 3.9% | 3.2% | 1.2% | 0.95% | 0.73% | <0.01% |
| Mar 2026 | 26.3% | 47.7% | 9.6% | 4.3% | 4.3% | 2.9% | 2.3% | 1.4% | 0.76% | 0.43% | <0.01% |
| Apr 2026 | 35.6% | 29.2% | 13.1% | 5.8% | 5.8% | 3.2% | 3.2% | 2.4% | 0.94% | 0.77% | <0.01% |
| May 2026 | 39% | 21.3% | 14.3% | 6.4% | 6.4% | 3.5% | 2.8% | 4.6% | 0.93% | 0.64% | <0.01% |
| Jun 2026 | 39.8% | 21.8% | 14.6% | 6.5% | 6.5% | 3.6% | 3.6% | 2.1% | 0.95% | 0.58% | <0.01% |
| Jul 2026 | 35.4% | 23.7% | 15.9% | 7.1% | 7.1% | 3.9% | 3.1% | 1.9% | 1.3% | 0.72% | <0.01% |
| Aug 2026 | 33.8% | 27.6% | 15.1% | 5.5% | 6.8% | 3.7% | 2.5% | 3.3% | 0.98% | 0.68% | <0.01% |
| Sep 2026 | 33.9% | 27.7% | 15.2% | 6.8% | 6.8% | 3.7% | 2.5% | 2% | 0.98% | 0.6% | <0.01% |
How has the Black Duck and Socket comparison changed over the last 12 months?
3 findings
- Socket was ahead of Black Duck in every measured month of the 12 months ending September 2026.
- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, Black Duck’s share of searches among dependency scanning tools worldwide moved from 1.1% to 0.98%, and its estimated monthly branded searches moved from 1.5K to 1.4K.
- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, Socket’s share of searches among dependency scanning tools worldwide moved from 1.2% to 2%, and its estimated monthly branded searches moved from 1.6K to 2.9K.
How did search popularity change for dependency scanning tools worldwide in September 2026?
1 change

In September 2026, Socket lost share of searches among dependency scanning tools worldwide, from 3.3% to 2%.
How are branded searches counted?
4 search terms
Brandwave collects information about searches that people make online using Black Duck’s and Socket’s names. When viewed over time, estimated search volumes for these branded terms can be used to understand whether interest in the brands is growing, holding steady, or fading.
Black Duck
2 branded search terms
- black duck sca
- synopsys black duck
Socket
2 branded search terms
- socket security
- socket.dev
Other head-to-heads among dependency scanning tools

Put your own brand in this comparison
Brandwave tracks your branded demand next to the rival you actually watch, with your campaigns, spend and outcomes on the same timeline.