Interactive Brokers vs Webull:Which is more popular?
In September 2026, Interactive Brokers had more branded searches than Webull among share trading platforms in Australia. Interactive Brokers had about 12,100 branded searches, while Webull had 5,400. Interactive Brokers made up 4.1% of all share trading platform searches we track, and Webull accounted for 1.8%. When we asked ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews about share trading platforms, Interactive Brokers appeared in four of the five answers and Webull in one. Interactive Brokers was mentioned before Webull in three out of four answers that named either.
Who do people search for more?
Interactive Brokers, about 2 searches for every 1 for Webull
Who does AI mention more?
Interactive Brokers, mentioned in 4 of 5 answers, Webull in 1
Who does AI recommend more?
Interactive Brokers, named ahead of Webull in 3 of 4 answers
Follow Interactive Brokers vs Webull and get free monthly updates on what changed
By continuing you'll get index updates and occasional product news from Brandwave. Unsubscribe any time. Privacy
Top share trading platforms in ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews
In three ChatGPT questions and two Google AI Overviews, Interactive Brokers was mentioned in four out of five: in two of the three ChatGPT answers and in both Google AI Overviews. Webull was mentioned in one out of five: not in any of the three ChatGPT answers, but in one of the two Google AI Overviews. Interactive Brokers was listed before Webull in three out of four answers that named either.
Most recommended by AI
Brands get a higher ranking if they are mentioned earlier in the answers.
CMC Invest1st
moomoo2nd- Interactive Brokers3rd
CommSec4th
Stake5th
Pearler6th
Webull7th
nabtrade–
Selfwealth–
Mentioned by AI
Each dot is one answer, filled in when that answer mentions the brand.
- CMC Invest5 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 2 of 2 Google answers
- CommSec4 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 2 of 2 Google answers
- moomoo4 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 2 of 2 Google answers
- Interactive Brokers4 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 2 of 2 Google answers
- Stake4 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 2 of 2 Google answers
- Pearler2 of 5Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
- Webull1 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
- nabtrade0 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
- Selfwealth0 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
See every answer about share trading platforms
5 answers
Asked ChatGPT
“Which share trading platform should I use in Australia?”
Asked ChatGPT
“What are the best share trading platforms in Australia?”
Asked ChatGPT
“What's the best share trading platform in Australia for beginners?”
Searched Google, AI Overview
“best share trading platform australia”
Searched Google, AI Overview
“share trading platform”
Not named in any answer:
Brands are shown in the order each answer named them. The survey took place in Australia on October 22, 2026.
Is Interactive Brokers or Webull more popular in search?
This chart shows how often people search Google for Interactive Brokers and Webull by name. Each line represents a brand's share of searches for all nine share trading platforms we track, month by month, from searches in Australia.
Share of searches by month for Interactive Brokers, Webull. The figures are in the table below the chart.
View monthly share of searches table
| Month | CommSec | nabtrade | CMC Invest | moomoo | Selfwealth | Interactive Brokers | Pearler | Webull | Stake |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 2025 | 54.4% | 16.4% | 4.9% | 6% | 6% | 4% | 4% | 2.2% | 2.1% |
| Nov 2025 | 50.6% | 18.6% | 4.5% | 6.8% | 6.8% | 4.5% | 3.7% | 2.5% | 1.9% |
| Dec 2025 | 50.5% | 18.5% | 4.5% | 6.8% | 6.8% | 4.5% | 4.5% | 2% | 1.9% |
| Jan 2026 | 50.8% | 15.3% | 5.6% | 6.8% | 6.8% | 4.6% | 5.6% | 2.5% | 1.9% |
| Feb 2026 | 50.3% | 18.5% | 5.5% | 6.8% | 6.8% | 4.5% | 3.7% | 2% | 1.9% |
| Mar 2026 | 54.2% | 16.3% | 6% | 6% | 6% | 4% | 4% | 1.8% | 1.7% |
| Apr 2026 | 53% | 15.9% | 7.1% | 5.8% | 5.8% | 4.8% | 3.9% | 2.1% | 1.6% |
| May 2026 | 51% | 15.3% | 6.9% | 6.9% | 5.6% | 5.6% | 4.6% | 2.5% | 1.6% |
| Jun 2026 | 56.6% | 13.9% | 6.3% | 6.3% | 5.1% | 5.1% | 3.4% | 1.9% | 1.5% |
| Jul 2026 | 57.5% | 14.2% | 6.4% | 5.2% | 5.2% | 4.2% | 4.2% | 1.9% | 1.2% |
| Aug 2026 | 55.1% | 16.6% | 6.1% | 6.1% | 5% | 4.1% | 4.1% | 1.8% | 1.2% |
| Sep 2026 | 56% | 13.7% | 7.5% | 6.1% | 5% | 4.1% | 4.1% | 1.8% | 1.5% |
How has the Interactive Brokers and Webull comparison changed over the last 12 months?
3 findings
- Interactive Brokers was ahead of Webull in every measured month of the 12 months ending September 2026.
- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, Interactive Brokers’ share of searches among share trading platforms in Australia moved from 4% to 4.1%, and its estimated monthly branded searches moved from 18.1K to 12.1K.
- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, Webull’s share of searches among share trading platforms in Australia moved from 2.2% to 1.8%, and its estimated monthly branded searches moved from 9.9K to 5.4K.
How did search popularity change for Australia share trading platforms in September 2026?
2 changes
Estimated monthly branded searches for Webull in Australia fell 45.5% over 12 measured months, from 9.9K to 5.4K in September 2026.
Estimated monthly branded searches for Interactive Brokers in Australia fell 33.1% over 12 measured months, from 18.1K to 12.1K in September 2026.
How are branded searches counted?
2 search terms
Brandwave collects information about searches that people make online using Interactive Brokers’ and Webull’s names. When viewed over time, estimated search volumes for these branded terms can be used to understand whether interest in the brands is growing, holding steady, or fading.
Interactive Brokers
1 branded search term
- interactive brokers
Webull
1 branded search term
- webull
Other head-to-heads among share trading platforms
Put your own brand in this comparison
Brandwave tracks your branded demand next to the rival you actually watch, with your campaigns, spend and outcomes on the same timeline.