Galliano vs Jägermeister:Which is more popular?
In September 2026, Jägermeister had more branded searches than Galliano among liqueur brands in Australia. Jägermeister had about 18,100 branded searches, while Galliano had 390. Jägermeister made up 14.2% of all liqueur brand searches we track, and Galliano accounted for 0.31%. When we asked ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews about liqueur brands, neither Galliano nor Jägermeister appeared in any of the four answers.
Who do people search for more?
Jägermeister, about 46 searches for every 1 for Galliano
Who does AI mention more?
Both were mentioned in 0 of 4 answers.
Follow Galliano vs Jägermeister and get free monthly updates on what changed
By continuing you'll get index updates and occasional product news from Brandwave. Unsubscribe any time. Privacy
Top liqueur brands in ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews
In three ChatGPT questions and one Google AI Overview, neither Galliano nor Jägermeister showed up in any of the four answers.
Most recommended by AI
Brands get a higher ranking if they are mentioned earlier in the answers.
Mentioned by AI
Each dot is one answer, filled in when that answer mentions the brand.
Cointreau3 of 4Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 1 Google answers
Baileys2 of 4Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 1 Google answers
Kahlúa2 of 4Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 1 Google answers
Disaronno2 of 4Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 1 Google answers
St-Germain2 of 4Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 1 Google answers
Chambord2 of 4Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 1 Google answers
Licor 431 of 4Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 1 Google answers
Grand Marnier1 of 4Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 1 Google answers
Aperol0 of 4Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 1 Google answers
Galliano0 of 4Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 1 Google answers
See every answer about liqueur brands
4 answers
Asked ChatGPT
“Which liqueur should I buy for cocktails?”
Asked ChatGPT
“What are the best liqueur brands?”
Asked ChatGPT
“What's a good liqueur to have after dinner?”
Searched Google, AI Overview
“liqueur”
Searched Google, AI Overview
“coffee liqueur”
Google showed no AI Overview for this search.
Not named in any answer:
Brands are shown in the order each answer named them. The survey took place in Australia on October 26, 2026.
Is Galliano or Jägermeister more popular in search?
This chart shows how often people search Google for Galliano and Jägermeister by name. Each line represents a brand's share of searches for all 14 liqueur brands we track, month by month, from searches in Australia.
Share of searches by month for Jägermeister, Galliano. The figures are in the table below the chart.
View monthly share of searches table
| Month | Baileys | Aperol | Jägermeister | Cointreau | Kahlúa | Disaronno | Frangelico | Licor 43 | Tia Maria | Grand Marnier | St-Germain | Chambord | Midori | Galliano |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 2025 | 18.3% | 14.9% | 14.9% | 12.2% | 10% | 6.7% | 6.7% | 4.5% | 3.6% | 3.6% | 2.4% | 1.1% | 0.73% | 0.26% |
| Nov 2025 | 24.1% | 13.2% | 13.2% | 13.2% | 8.8% | 5.9% | 7.2% | 3.9% | 3.2% | 3.2% | 2.1% | 1.2% | 0.64% | 0.23% |
| Dec 2025 | 27.9% | 12.5% | 8.4% | 12.5% | 10.2% | 5.6% | 6.8% | 4.6% | 3.7% | 3.7% | 2.5% | 0.9% | 0.6% | 0.18% |
| Jan 2026 | 17.2% | 17.2% | 11.5% | 14% | 9.4% | 6.3% | 7.7% | 5.1% | 3.4% | 3.4% | 2.8% | 1% | 0.68% | 0.2% |
| Feb 2026 | 18.7% | 12.5% | 15.3% | 12.5% | 10.2% | 6.8% | 8.4% | 4.5% | 3.7% | 3% | 2.5% | 1% | 0.74% | 0.22% |
| Mar 2026 | 22.1% | 12.1% | 14.7% | 12.1% | 9.9% | 6.6% | 8.1% | 4.4% | 3.6% | 2.9% | 1.9% | 0.88% | 0.72% | 0.21% |
| Apr 2026 | 21.2% | 11.6% | 14.1% | 11.6% | 9.5% | 7.7% | 7.7% | 5.2% | 3.4% | 3.4% | 2.3% | 1.2% | 0.84% | 0.25% |
| May 2026 | 20.3% | 11% | 16.5% | 11% | 11% | 6% | 7.4% | 4.9% | 4% | 3.3% | 2.2% | 1.2% | 0.8% | 0.24% |
| Jun 2026 | 17.4% | 11.6% | 17.4% | 11.6% | 11.6% | 6.3% | 7.8% | 5.2% | 3.5% | 3.5% | 1.8% | 1.2% | 0.85% | 0.2% |
| Jul 2026 | 19.6% | 10.7% | 16% | 13.1% | 10.7% | 7.2% | 7.2% | 4.8% | 3.2% | 3.2% | 2.1% | 1.4% | 0.78% | 0.19% |
| Aug 2026 | 18.6% | 12.4% | 15.2% | 12.4% | 10.1% | 6.8% | 8.3% | 4.5% | 3.7% | 3% | 2.4% | 1.6% | 0.74% | 0.22% |
| Sep 2026 | 21.3% | 14.2% | 14.2% | 11.6% | 9.5% | 6.4% | 6.4% | 5.2% | 3.5% | 2.8% | 2.3% | 1.5% | 0.69% | 0.31% |
How has the Galliano and Jägermeister comparison changed over the last 12 months?
3 findings
- Jägermeister was ahead of Galliano in every measured month of the 12 months ending September 2026.
- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, Galliano’s share of searches among liqueur brands in Australia moved from 0.26% to 0.31%, and its estimated monthly branded searches moved from 320 to 390.
- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, Jägermeister’s share of searches among liqueur brands in Australia moved from 14.9% to 14.2%, and its estimated monthly branded searches held steady at 18.1K.
How did search popularity change for Australia liqueur brands in September 2026?
3 changes
In September 2026, Aperol overtook Jägermeister to rank 2nd among liqueur brands in Australia, with 14.2% of the searches.
In September 2026, Jägermeister lost share of searches among liqueur brands in Australia, from 15.2% to 14.2%.
Estimated monthly branded searches for Galliano in Australia rose 21.9% over 12 measured months, from 320 to 390 in September 2026.
How are branded searches counted?
2 search terms
Brandwave collects information about searches that people make online using Galliano’s and Jägermeister’s names. When viewed over time, estimated search volumes for these branded terms can be used to understand whether interest in the brands is growing, holding steady, or fading.
Galliano
1 branded search term
- galliano liqueur
Jägermeister
1 branded search term
- jagermeister
Other head-to-heads among liqueur brands
Put your own brand in this comparison
Brandwave tracks your branded demand next to the rival you actually watch, with your campaigns, spend and outcomes on the same timeline.