Frank Green vs Owala:Which is more popular?
In September 2026, Owala had more branded searches than Frank Green among drink bottle brands in Australia. Owala had about 110,000 branded searches, while Frank Green had 74,000. Owala made up 42.5% of all drink bottle brand searches we track, and Frank Green accounted for 28.6%. When we asked ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews about drink bottle brands, Frank Green appeared in two of the five answers and Owala in one. Frank Green was mentioned before Owala in every answer that named either.
Who do people search for more?
Owala, about 49% more searches than Frank Green
Who does AI mention more?
Frank Green, mentioned in 2 of 5 answers, Owala in 1
Who does AI recommend more?
Frank Green, named ahead of Owala in 2 of 2 answers
Follow Frank Green vs Owala and get free monthly updates on what changed
By continuing you'll get index updates and occasional product news from Brandwave. Unsubscribe any time. Privacy
Top drink bottle brands in ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews
In three ChatGPT questions and two Google AI Overviews, Frank Green was mentioned in two out of five: in one of the three ChatGPT answers and in one of the two Google AI Overviews. Owala was mentioned in one out of five: in one of the three ChatGPT answers, but not in either of the two Google AI Overviews. Frank Green was listed before Owala in every answer that named either.
Most recommended by AI
Brands get a higher ranking if they are mentioned earlier in the answers.
Hydro Flask1st
Frank Green2nd
YETI3rd
Klean Kanteen4th
Owala5th
Stanley6th
CamelBak–
Chilly's–
Cheeki–
Sistema–- +1 more
Mentioned by AI
Each dot is one answer, filled in when that answer mentions the brand.
Hydro Flask3 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
YETI3 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
Frank Green2 of 5Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
Owala1 of 5Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
Stanley1 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
CamelBak1 of 5Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
Klean Kanteen1 of 5Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
Chilly's0 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
Cheeki0 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
Sistema0 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
See every answer about drink bottle brands
5 answers
Asked ChatGPT
“What's the best insulated drink bottle in Australia?”
Asked ChatGPT
“Which water bottle keeps drinks cold the longest?”
Asked ChatGPT
“Which drink bottle is best for kids?”
Searched Google, AI Overview
“water bottle”
Searched Google, AI Overview
“drink bottle”
Brands are shown in the order each answer named them. The survey took place in Australia on October 26, 2026.
Is Frank Green or Owala more popular in search?
This chart shows how often people search Google for Frank Green and Owala by name. Each line represents a brand's share of searches for all 11 drink bottle brands we track, month by month, from searches in Australia.
Share of searches by month for Owala, Frank Green. The figures are in the table below the chart.
View monthly share of searches table
| Month | Owala | Frank Green | Stanley | Hydro Flask | YETI | CamelBak | Klean Kanteen | Chilly's | Cheeki | Sistema | MontiiCo |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 2025 | 38% | 38% | 7.6% | 7.7% | 4.2% | 2.8% | 0.83% | 0.45% | 0.25% | 0.2% | 0.11% |
| Nov 2025 | 33.7% | 41% | 8% | 10.1% | 3.7% | 2% | 0.73% | 0.33% | 0.18% | 0.15% | 0.14% |
| Dec 2025 | 28.7% | 42.8% | 11.8% | 8.6% | 4.7% | 2.1% | 0.62% | 0.21% | 0.19% | 0.15% | 0.1% |
| Jan 2026 | 38.8% | 31.6% | 10.7% | 9.5% | 4.3% | 2.8% | 1% | 0.37% | 0.29% | 0.25% | 0.28% |
| Feb 2026 | 44.6% | 29.9% | 8.4% | 9% | 4% | 2.2% | 0.96% | 0.33% | 0.24% | 0.2% | 0.15% |
| Mar 2026 | 39.5% | 32.5% | 9.5% | 9.7% | 4.3% | 2.4% | 0.86% | 0.57% | 0.26% | 0.26% | 0.11% |
| Apr 2026 | 37.4% | 37.4% | 9.1% | 7.5% | 4.1% | 2.2% | 0.99% | 0.66% | 0.3% | 0.24% | 0.13% |
| May 2026 | 39% | 31.9% | 12.2% | 7.8% | 4.3% | 2.3% | 1% | 0.82% | 0.31% | 0.25% | 0.14% |
| Jun 2026 | 39.2% | 32.1% | 10.3% | 9.6% | 3.5% | 2.9% | 1% | 0.69% | 0.26% | 0.26% | 0.11% |
| Jul 2026 | 40.7% | 33.5% | 10.8% | 6.7% | 3.7% | 2.4% | 0.89% | 0.59% | 0.27% | 0.27% | 0.11% |
| Aug 2026 | 44.3% | 29.7% | 10.9% | 7.3% | 4% | 2.2% | 0.79% | 0.43% | 0.19% | 0.24% | 0.1% |
| Sep 2026 | 42.5% | 28.6% | 10.9% | 8.6% | 4.7% | 2.6% | 0.93% | 0.5% | 0.28% | 0.28% | 0.11% |
How has the Frank Green and Owala comparison changed over the last 12 months?
3 findings
- The lead changed hands once in the 12 months ending September 2026: Owala took it in January 2026.
- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, Frank Green’s share of searches among drink bottle brands in Australia moved from 38% to 28.6%, and its estimated monthly branded searches moved from 110K to 74K.
- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, Owala’s share of searches among drink bottle brands in Australia moved from 38% to 42.5%, and its estimated monthly branded searches held steady at 110K.
How did search popularity change for Australia drink bottle brands in September 2026?
2 changes

In September 2026, Owala lost share of searches among drink bottle brands in Australia, from 44.3% to 42.5%.

In September 2026, Frank Green lost share of searches among drink bottle brands in Australia, from 29.7% to 28.6%.
How are branded searches counted?
2 search terms
Brandwave collects information about searches that people make online using Frank Green’s and Owala’s names. When viewed over time, estimated search volumes for these branded terms can be used to understand whether interest in the brands is growing, holding steady, or fading.
Frank Green
1 branded search term
- frank green
Owala
1 branded search term
- owala
Other head-to-heads among drink bottle brands

Put your own brand in this comparison
Brandwave tracks your branded demand next to the rival you actually watch, with your campaigns, spend and outcomes on the same timeline.