Dine vs Fancy Feast:Which is more popular?
In September 2026, Dine had more branded searches than Fancy Feast among cat food brands in Australia. Dine had about 6,600 branded searches, while Fancy Feast had 5,400. Dine made up 11.5% of all cat food brand searches we track, and Fancy Feast accounted for 9.4%. When we asked ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews about cat food brands, Fancy Feast appeared in three of the five answers and Dine in one. Fancy Feast was mentioned before Dine in every answer that named either.
Who do people search for more?
Dine, about 22% more searches than Fancy Feast
Who does AI mention more?
Fancy Feast, mentioned in 3 of 5 answers, Dine in 1
Who does AI recommend more?
Fancy Feast, named ahead of Dine in 3 of 3 answers
Follow Dine vs Fancy Feast and get free monthly updates on what changed
By continuing you'll get index updates and occasional product news from Brandwave. Unsubscribe any time. Privacy
Top cat food brands in ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews
In three ChatGPT questions and two Google AI Overviews, Fancy Feast was mentioned in three out of five: in one of the three ChatGPT answers and in both Google AI Overviews. Dine was mentioned in one out of five: not in any of the three ChatGPT answers, but in one of the two Google AI Overviews. Fancy Feast was listed before Dine in every answer that named either.
Most recommended by AI
Brands get a higher ranking if they are mentioned earlier in the answers.
Royal Canin1st
Hill's2nd
Fancy Feast3rd- Feline Natural4th
Black Hawk5th
Whiskas6th
Advance7th
ZIWI Peak8th
Felix9th
Dine10th- +2 more
Mentioned by AI
Each dot is one answer, filled in when that answer mentions the brand.
Royal Canin5 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 2 of 2 Google answers
Hill's4 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 2 of 2 Google answers
Fancy Feast3 of 5Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 2 of 2 Google answers- Feline Natural3 of 5Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 2 of 2 Google answers
ZIWI Peak2 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 2 of 2 Google answers
Black Hawk2 of 5Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
Advance2 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
Felix1 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
Whiskas1 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
Dine1 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
See every answer about cat food brands
5 answers
Asked ChatGPT
“What's the best cat food in Australia?”
Asked ChatGPT
“Which cat food is best for an indoor cat?”
Asked ChatGPT
“What's a good wet food for a fussy cat?”
Searched Google, AI Overview
“cat food”
Searched Google, AI Overview
“best cat food”
Not named in any answer:
Brands are shown in the order each answer named them. The survey took place in Australia on October 27, 2026.
Is Dine or Fancy Feast more popular in search?
This chart shows how often people search Google for Dine and Fancy Feast by name. Each line represents a brand's share of searches for all 12 cat food brands we track, month by month, from searches in Australia.
Share of searches by month for Dine, Fancy Feast. The figures are in the table below the chart.
View monthly share of searches table
| Month | Felix | Whiskas | Royal Canin | Dine | Applaws | Fancy Feast | ZIWI Peak | Optimum | Hill's | Black Hawk | Advance | Feline Natural |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 2025 | 17.9% | 12.6% | 14.6% | 14.6% | 13.9% | 8% | 4.2% | 4.2% | 3.5% | 2.2% | 1.9% | 2.2% |
| Nov 2025 | 21.4% | 12.3% | 14.3% | 14.3% | 11.3% | 7.8% | 5.2% | 3.5% | 2.8% | 2.8% | 2.2% | 2.2% |
| Dec 2025 | 21.9% | 14.8% | 14.6% | 14.6% | 10.9% | 8% | 4.2% | 2.9% | 2.2% | 1.9% | 1.9% | 1.9% |
| Jan 2026 | 18.9% | 12.8% | 15.4% | 15.4% | 9.9% | 8.4% | 6.9% | 3% | 2.5% | 1.9% | 1.9% | 3% |
| Feb 2026 | 21.7% | 12.5% | 17.7% | 11.8% | 9.2% | 7.9% | 6.3% | 2.8% | 2.8% | 2.2% | 2.2% | 2.8% |
| Mar 2026 | 22.4% | 13% | 15% | 15% | 9.6% | 8.1% | 5.4% | 3% | 3% | 1.9% | 1.9% | 1.9% |
| Apr 2026 | 19.7% | 16.3% | 16.1% | 13.1% | 10.3% | 7.2% | 5.8% | 3.2% | 2.6% | 1.8% | 2% | 2% |
| May 2026 | 19% | 15.7% | 15.6% | 15.6% | 10% | 8.4% | 4.6% | 3.1% | 2.5% | 1.9% | 1.9% | 1.7% |
| Jun 2026 | 20.8% | 14.1% | 13.9% | 20.8% | 8.9% | 7.6% | 4.1% | 2.8% | 2.2% | 1.5% | 1.7% | 1.5% |
| Jul 2026 | 22.5% | 14.7% | 15% | 15% | 9.7% | 8.2% | 4.5% | 3% | 2.4% | 1.6% | 1.9% | 1.6% |
| Aug 2026 | 22.8% | 15.5% | 15.3% | 12.5% | 9.8% | 8.3% | 4.5% | 3.6% | 2.5% | 1.7% | 1.9% | 1.7% |
| Sep 2026 | 25.8% | 14.3% | 14.1% | 11.5% | 10.4% | 9.4% | 4.2% | 3.3% | 2.3% | 1.7% | 1.5% | 1.5% |
How has the Dine and Fancy Feast comparison changed over the last 12 months?
3 findings
- Dine was ahead of Fancy Feast in every measured month of the 12 months ending September 2026.
- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, Dine’s share of searches among cat food brands in Australia moved from 14.6% to 11.5%, and its estimated monthly branded searches held steady at 6.6K.
- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, Fancy Feast’s share of searches among cat food brands in Australia moved from 8% to 9.4%, and its estimated monthly branded searches moved from 3.6K to 5.4K.
How did search popularity change for Australia cat food brands in September 2026?
2 changes

In September 2026, Fancy Feast gained share of searches among cat food brands in Australia, from 8.3% to 9.4%.

In September 2026, Dine lost share of searches among cat food brands in Australia, from 12.5% to 11.5%.
How are branded searches counted?
2 search terms
Brandwave collects information about searches that people make online using Dine’s and Fancy Feast’s names. When viewed over time, estimated search volumes for these branded terms can be used to understand whether interest in the brands is growing, holding steady, or fading.
Dine
1 branded search term
- dine cat food
Fancy Feast
1 branded search term
- fancy feast
Other head-to-heads among cat food brands

Put your own brand in this comparison
Brandwave tracks your branded demand next to the rival you actually watch, with your campaigns, spend and outcomes on the same timeline.