Brandwave

Bonds vs Gingerlilly:Which is more popular?

In September 2026, Bonds had more branded searches than Gingerlilly among sleepwear brands in Australia. Bonds had about 2,400 branded searches, while Gingerlilly had 480. Bonds made up 0.5% of all sleepwear brand searches we track, and Gingerlilly accounted for 0.1%. When we asked ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews about sleepwear brands, Bonds and Gingerlilly each appeared in two of the five answers. Bonds and Gingerlilly were each mentioned first in two of the four answers that named either.

Among sleepwear brands in Australia in September 2026

Who do people search for more?

Bonds, about 5 searches for every 1 for Gingerlilly

Bonds 2.4K searchesGingerlilly 480 searches

Who does AI mention more?

Both were mentioned in 2 of 5 answers.

Bonds in 2 of 5Gingerlilly in 2 of 5

Who does AI recommend more?

Each is named first in 2 of 4 answers.

Bonds first in 2Gingerlilly first in 2

Follow Bonds vs Gingerlilly and get free monthly updates on what changed

By continuing you'll get index updates and occasional product news from Brandwave. Unsubscribe any time. Privacy

Track your brand against a rival →

Top sleepwear brands in ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews

In three ChatGPT questions and two Google AI Overviews, Bonds was mentioned in two out of five: in two of the three ChatGPT answers, but not in either of the two Google AI Overviews. Gingerlilly was mentioned in two out of five: in one of the three ChatGPT answers and in one of the two Google AI Overviews. Bonds and Gingerlilly were each listed first in two of the four answers that named either.

Most recommended by AI

Brands get a higher ranking if they are mentioned earlier in the answers.

  1. Peter Alexander1st
  2. Papinelle2nd
  3. Sussan3rd
  4. Kmart4th
  5. Piyama5th
  6. Boody6th
  7. Gingerlilly7th
  8. Bonds8th
  9. Homebodii–
  10. Sant and Abel–

Mentioned by AI

Each dot is one answer, filled in when that answer mentions the brand.

  • Peter Alexander5 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 2 of 2 Google answers
  • Papinelle4 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
  • Piyama4 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 2 of 2 Google answers
  • Sussan4 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 2 of 2 Google answers
  • Kmart3 of 5Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 2 of 2 Google answers
  • Bonds2 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
  • Gingerlilly2 of 5Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
  • Boody2 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
  • Homebodii0 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
  • Sant and Abel0 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers

See every answer about sleepwear brands

5 answers

Not named in any answer:

Brands are shown in the order each answer named them. The survey took place in Australia on October 26, 2026.

Is Bonds or Gingerlilly more popular in search?

This chart shows how often people search Google for Bonds and Gingerlilly by name. Each line represents a brand's share of searches for all ten sleepwear brands we track, month by month, from searches in Australia.

Bonds and Gingerlilly among sleepwear brands in Australia, by month

Share of searches by month for Bonds, Gingerlilly. The figures are in the table below the chart.

View monthly share of searches table
MonthPeter AlexanderPapinellePiyamaHomebodiiKmartSussanBondsGingerlillyBoodySant and Abel
Oct 202593.2%1.4%1.7%1.1%1.1%0.75%0.5%0.15%0.1%0.04%
Nov 202594.6%1.4%1.4%0.76%0.62%0.62%0.41%0.1%0.07%0.07%
Dec 202595.7%1.2%0.95%0.52%0.52%0.63%0.28%0.08%0.06%0.07%
Jan 202694.5%1.7%1.1%0.93%0.62%0.62%0.27%0.1%0.07%0.04%
Feb 202691.7%2.5%1.6%1.3%1.1%0.88%0.58%0.15%0.1%0.05%
Mar 202694.3%1.4%0.93%0.75%1.1%0.62%0.62%0.12%0.08%0.05%
Apr 202692.6%2%1.1%0.91%1.4%1.1%0.6%0.15%0.12%0.04%
May 202693.3%2.1%0.92%0.75%1.1%1.1%0.49%0.12%0.1%0.04%
Jun 202695.5%1.4%0.62%0.51%0.77%0.62%0.41%0.08%0.07%0.05%
Jul 202692.7%2%1.1%0.91%1.4%1.1%0.48%0.12%0.12%0.07%
Aug 202692.3%2%1.4%1.1%1.4%1.1%0.48%0.1%0.1%0.1%
Sep 202693.1%2%1.4%0.91%0.91%0.91%0.5%0.1%0.08%0.05%

How has the Bonds and Gingerlilly comparison changed over the last 12 months?

3 findings
  • Bonds was ahead of Gingerlilly in every measured month of the 12 months ending September 2026.
  • Across the 12 months ending September 2026, Bonds’ share of searches among sleepwear brands in Australia held steady at 0.5%, and its estimated monthly branded searches held steady at 2.4K.
  • Across the 12 months ending September 2026, Gingerlilly’s share of searches among sleepwear brands in Australia moved from 0.15% to 0.1%, and its estimated monthly branded searches moved from 720 to 480.

How did search popularity change for Australia sleepwear brands in September 2026?

1 change

  1. In September 2026, Gingerlilly rose from 9th to 8th among sleepwear brands in Australia.

How are branded searches counted?

2 search terms

Brandwave collects information about searches that people make online using Bonds’ and Gingerlilly’s names. When viewed over time, estimated search volumes for these branded terms can be used to understand whether interest in the brands is growing, holding steady, or fading.

Bonds

1 branded search term

  • bonds pyjamas

Gingerlilly

1 branded search term

  • gingerlilly

How the Brand Demand Index is measured

Other head-to-heads among sleepwear brands

Creator with pink hair and a pink jacket

Put your own brand in this comparison

Brandwave tracks your branded demand next to the rival you actually watch, with your campaigns, spend and outcomes on the same timeline.

Start free