Clean Origin vs Kimaï:Which is more popular?
In September 2026, Clean Origin had more branded searches than Kimaï among lab-grown diamond jewelers in the United States. Clean Origin had about 5,400 branded searches, while Kimaï had 480. Clean Origin made up 1% of all lab-grown diamond jeweler searches we track, and Kimaï accounted for 0.09%. When we asked ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews about lab-grown diamond jewelers, Clean Origin appeared in one of the five answers and Kimaï in none.
Who do people search for more?
Clean Origin, about 11 searches for every 1 for Kimaï
Who does AI mention more?
Clean Origin, mentioned in 1 of 5 answers, Kimaï in 0
Follow Clean Origin vs Kimaï and get free monthly updates on what changed
By continuing you'll get index updates and occasional product news from Brandwave. Unsubscribe any time. Privacy
Top lab-grown diamond jewelers in ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews
In three ChatGPT questions and two Google AI Overviews, Clean Origin was mentioned in one out of five: in one of the three ChatGPT answers, but not in either of the two Google AI Overviews. Kimaï did not appear in any of the five answers.
Most recommended by AI
Brands get a higher ranking if they are mentioned earlier in the answers.
Mentioned by AI
Each dot is one answer, filled in when that answer mentions the brand.
Brilliant Earth5 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 2 of 2 Google answers
Rare Carat3 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
Blue Nile3 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
Ritani3 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
With Clarity3 of 5Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 2 of 2 Google answers
Grown Brilliance2 of 5Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
VRAI1 of 5Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
Clean Origin1 of 5Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
Frank Darling0 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
Kimaï0 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
See every answer about lab-grown diamond jewelers
5 answers
Asked ChatGPT
“Which lab-grown diamond jeweler should I buy from in the US?”
Asked ChatGPT
“What are the best lab-grown diamond jewelers in the US?”
Asked ChatGPT
“What's the best lab-grown diamond jeweler in the US for an engagement ring?”
Searched Google, AI Overview
“lab grown diamonds”
Searched Google, AI Overview
“lab grown diamond engagement rings”
Not named in any answer:
Brands are shown in the order each answer named them. The survey took place in United States on October 22, 2026.
Is Clean Origin or Kimaï more popular in search?
This chart shows how often people search Google for Clean Origin and Kimaï by name. Each line represents a brand's share of searches for all 12 lab-grown diamond jewelers we track, month by month, from searches in United States.
Share of searches by month for Clean Origin, Kimaï. The figures are in the table below the chart.
View monthly share of searches table
| Month | Brilliant Earth | Rare Carat | Frank Darling | Blue Nile | Grown Brilliance | Ritani | VRAI | Keyzar | Clean Origin | With Clarity | Ada Diamonds | Kimaï |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 2025 | 58.2% | 13.9% | 5.1% | 8.4% | 4.4% | 2.4% | 3.1% | 2.3% | 0.68% | 1.2% | 0.19% | 0.17% |
| Nov 2025 | 55.4% | 13.4% | 4% | 12.7% | 5.1% | 2.3% | 2.8% | 2% | 0.8% | 1.2% | 0.15% | 0.13% |
| Dec 2025 | 55.1% | 13.3% | 4% | 13.5% | 5% | 2.3% | 2.8% | 1.6% | 1.2% | 0.97% | 0.13% | 0.11% |
| Jan 2026 | 56.7% | 13.7% | 5% | 11.1% | 5.2% | 1.9% | 2.8% | 1.7% | 0.82% | 0.82% | 0.15% | 0.11% |
| Feb 2026 | 49.7% | 12.1% | 5.4% | 19.7% | 4.7% | 2% | 2.7% | 1.5% | 1.1% | 0.88% | 0.14% | 0.14% |
| Mar 2026 | 48.6% | 11.3% | 5% | 20.8% | 3.6% | 1.9% | 5.6% | 1.5% | 0.55% | 0.82% | 0.13% | 0.13% |
| Apr 2026 | 52.6% | 12.5% | 5.6% | 6.7% | 4% | 2.1% | 12.7% | 1.5% | 1.1% | 0.91% | 0.15% | 0.12% |
| May 2026 | 61.1% | 11.6% | 5.2% | 7.5% | 3.7% | 2% | 5.8% | 1.4% | 0.69% | 0.85% | 0.14% | 0.09% |
| Jun 2026 | 61.9% | 13.1% | 5.8% | 7.8% | 3.4% | 2.2% | 2.4% | 1.6% | 0.64% | 0.95% | 0.16% | 0.08% |
| Jul 2026 | 62.2% | 12.7% | 5.7% | 8.2% | 3.3% | 2.2% | 2.2% | 1.5% | 0.76% | 0.93% | 0.12% | 0.1% |
| Aug 2026 | 57% | 16.5% | 7.4% | 6.6% | 3.5% | 2.8% | 2.3% | 1.9% | 0.98% | 0.98% | 0.16% | 0.09% |
| Sep 2026 | 57.4% | 17% | 7.6% | 5.3% | 3.6% | 2.8% | 2.3% | 1.6% | 1% | 1% | 0.17% | 0.09% |
How has the Clean Origin and Kimaï comparison changed over the last 12 months?
3 findings
- Clean Origin was ahead of Kimaï in every measured month of the 12 months ending September 2026.
- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, Clean Origin’s share of searches among lab-grown diamond jewelers in the United States moved from 0.68% to 1%, and its estimated monthly branded searches moved from 3.6K to 5.4K.
- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, Kimaï’s share of searches among lab-grown diamond jewelers in the United States moved from 0.17% to 0.09%, and its estimated monthly branded searches moved from 880 to 480.
How did search popularity change for United States lab-grown diamond jewelers in September 2026?
2 changes

Estimated monthly branded searches for Clean Origin in the United States rose 50% over 12 measured months, from 3.6K to 5.4K in September 2026.

Estimated monthly branded searches for Kimaï in the United States fell 45.5% over 12 measured months, from 880 to 480 in September 2026.
How are branded searches counted?
2 search terms
Brandwave collects information about searches that people make online using Clean Origin’s and Kimaï’s names. When viewed over time, estimated search volumes for these branded terms can be used to understand whether interest in the brands is growing, holding steady, or fading.
Clean Origin
1 branded search term
- clean origin
Kimaï
1 branded search term
- kimai jewelry
Other head-to-heads among lab-grown diamond jewelers

Put your own brand in this comparison
Brandwave tracks your branded demand next to the rival you actually watch, with your campaigns, spend and outcomes on the same timeline.