How popular isPractice Fusion?
In September 2026, people searched for Practice Fusion by name about 110,000 times in the United States, an 18.5% decrease from the previous year. These searches made up 15.5% of all United States electronic health record searches, placing Practice Fusion third out of 12 records. When we asked both ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews about electronic health records, Practice Fusion appeared in two of the five answers and was the tenth most recommended of the 12.
Practice Fusion is the third most searched of 12 competitors and the tenth most recommended in AI answers.
AthenahealthShare of searches 28.3%Mentioned in 5 of 5 AI answersPlace in AI recommendations 1st
SimplePracticeShare of searches 28.3%Mentioned in 2 of 5 AI answersPlace in AI recommendations 11th
Practice FusionShare of searches 15.5%Mentioned in 2 of 5 AI answersPlace in AI recommendations 10th
AdvancedMDShare of searches 8.5%Mentioned in 2 of 5 AI answersPlace in AI recommendations 7th
Epic SystemsShare of searches 3.8%Mentioned in 4 of 5 AI answersPlace in AI recommendations 2nd
Follow Practice Fusion and get free monthly updates on what changed
By continuing you'll get index updates and occasional product news from Brandwave. Unsubscribe any time. Privacy
Top electronic health records in ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews
In three ChatGPT questions and two Google AI Overviews, Practice Fusion was mentioned in two out of five: in one of the three ChatGPT answers and in one of the two Google AI Overviews. Practice Fusion is the tenth most recommended of the 12.
Most recommended by AI
Brands get a higher ranking if they are mentioned earlier in the answers.
Athenahealth1st
Epic Systems2nd
Tebra3rd
Oracle Health4th
Elation Health5th
eClinicalWorks6th
AdvancedMD7th
MEDITECH8th
NextGen9th
Practice Fusion10th- +2 more
Mentioned by AI
Each dot is one answer, filled in when that answer mentions the brand.
Athenahealth5 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 2 of 2 Google answers
Epic Systems4 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 2 of 2 Google answers
Tebra3 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
eClinicalWorks3 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
Elation Health3 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
SimplePractice2 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
Practice Fusion2 of 5Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
AdvancedMD2 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
MEDITECH2 of 5Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
Oracle Health2 of 5Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
See every answer about electronic health records
5 answers
Asked ChatGPT
“Which electronic health record system should I use in the US?”
Asked ChatGPT
“What are the best electronic health record systems in the US?”
Asked ChatGPT
“What's the best electronic health record system in the US for a small clinic?”
Searched Google, AI Overview
“electronic health record systems”
Searched Google, AI Overview
“medical records software”
Not named in any answer:
Brands are shown in the order each answer named them. The survey took place in United States on October 19, 2026.
Which electronic health records compete with Practice Fusion?
Share of searches by month for Athenahealth, SimplePractice, Practice Fusion, AdvancedMD, Epic Systems, Tebra, eClinicalWorks, MEDITECH, Oracle Health. The figures are in the table below the chart.
View monthly share of searches table
| Month | Athenahealth | SimplePractice | Practice Fusion | AdvancedMD | Epic Systems | Tebra | eClinicalWorks | MEDITECH | Oracle Health | Elation Health | Allscripts | NextGen |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 2025 | 34.5% | 23% | 15.5% | 8.5% | 3.8% | 4.6% | 2.5% | 2.5% | 2.1% | 1.1% | 1.1% | 0.62% |
| Nov 2025 | 29.8% | 24.5% | 16.3% | 9% | 4% | 4.9% | 3.3% | 2.7% | 2.7% | 0.98% | 1.2% | 0.65% |
| Dec 2025 | 30% | 24.6% | 16.4% | 9% | 4% | 4.9% | 2.7% | 2.7% | 2.7% | 0.98% | 1.2% | 0.66% |
| Jan 2026 | 26.4% | 26.4% | 17.7% | 7.9% | 4.3% | 4.3% | 3.6% | 2.9% | 2.9% | 1.1% | 1.3% | 1.1% |
| Feb 2026 | 29.6% | 24.3% | 16.2% | 8.9% | 4% | 4.9% | 3.3% | 3.3% | 2.7% | 0.97% | 1.2% | 0.79% |
| Mar 2026 | 30.4% | 24.8% | 16.7% | 9.1% | 4.1% | 4.1% | 2.7% | 2.7% | 2.7% | 1% | 1% | 0.67% |
| Apr 2026 | 28.2% | 23.1% | 18.9% | 8.5% | 4.6% | 4.6% | 3.1% | 3.1% | 2.5% | 1.1% | 1.1% | 0.93% |
| May 2026 | 29.9% | 24.6% | 16.4% | 9% | 4% | 4.9% | 3.3% | 2.7% | 2.2% | 1.2% | 0.98% | 0.8% |
| Jun 2026 | 27.2% | 27.2% | 18.3% | 8.2% | 3.7% | 4.5% | 3% | 3% | 2.4% | 1.1% | 0.89% | 0.6% |
| Jul 2026 | 29.6% | 24.3% | 16.2% | 8.9% | 4% | 4.9% | 4% | 2.7% | 2.7% | 1.2% | 0.8% | 0.8% |
| Aug 2026 | 31.5% | 25.7% | 14.1% | 7.7% | 6.3% | 4.2% | 2.8% | 2.8% | 2.3% | 1% | 0.69% | 0.69% |
| Sep 2026 | 28.3% | 28.3% | 15.5% | 8.5% | 3.8% | 3.8% | 3.1% | 3.1% | 3.1% | 1.1% | 0.76% | 0.62% |
| Rank | Brand | Share of searches | Estimated monthly branded searches | vs prior month | Share change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1, held 1st | 28.3% | 201K | -18.3% | -3.2 points | |
| 2, held 2nd | 28.3% | 201K | 0% | +2.5 points | |
| 3, held 3rd | 15.5% | 110K | 0% | +1.4 points | |
| 4, held 4th | 8.5% | 60.5K | 0% | +0.8 points | |
| 5, held 5th | 3.8% | 27.1K | -45.3% | -2.5 points | |
| 6, held 6th | 3.8% | 27.1K | -18.1% | -0.4 points | |
| 7, held 7th | 3.1% | 22.2K | 0% | +0.3 points | |
| 8, held 8th | 3.1% | 22.2K | 0% | +0.3 points | |
| 9, held 9th | 3.1% | 22.2K | +22.7% | +0.8 points | |
| 10, held 10th | 1.1% | 8.1K | 0% | +0.1 points | |
| 11, held 11th | 0.76% | 5.4K | 0% | +0.1 points | |
| 12, held 12th | 0.62% | 4.4K | -18.5% | -0.1 points |
28.3%
Held 1st. 201K estimated branded searches, -18.3% vs prior month. Share -3.2 points.
28.3%
Held 2nd. 201K estimated branded searches, 0% vs prior month. Share +2.5 points.
15.5%
Held 3rd. 110K estimated branded searches, 0% vs prior month. Share +1.4 points.
8.5%
Held 4th. 60.5K estimated branded searches, 0% vs prior month. Share +0.8 points.
3.8%
Held 5th. 27.1K estimated branded searches, -45.3% vs prior month. Share -2.5 points.
6.
Tebra3.8%
Held 6th. 27.1K estimated branded searches, -18.1% vs prior month. Share -0.4 points.
3.1%
Held 7th. 22.2K estimated branded searches, 0% vs prior month. Share +0.3 points.
8.
MEDITECH3.1%
Held 8th. 22.2K estimated branded searches, 0% vs prior month. Share +0.3 points.
3.1%
Held 9th. 22.2K estimated branded searches, +22.7% vs prior month. Share +0.8 points.
1.1%
Held 10th. 8.1K estimated branded searches, 0% vs prior month. Share +0.1 points.
11.
Allscripts0.76%
Held 11th. 5.4K estimated branded searches, 0% vs prior month. Share +0.1 points.
12.
NextGen0.62%
Held 12th. 4.4K estimated branded searches, -18.5% vs prior month. Share -0.1 points.
Compare popularity between Practice Fusion and its closest rivals
Every comparison with Practice Fusion
13 comparisons
- Athenahealth vs Practice Fusion
- Practice Fusion vs SimplePractice
- AdvancedMD vs Practice Fusion
- Epic Systems vs Practice Fusion
- Practice Fusion vs Tebra
- DrChrono vs Practice Fusion
- eClinicalWorks vs Practice Fusion
- MEDITECH vs Practice Fusion
- Oracle Health vs Practice Fusion
- Elation Health vs Practice Fusion
- Kareo vs Practice Fusion
- Allscripts vs Practice Fusion
- NextGen vs Practice Fusion
How has branded search demand for Practice Fusion changed in the United States over the last 12 months?
2 findings
- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, estimated monthly branded searches for Practice Fusion in the United States fell from 135K to 110K.
- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, Practice Fusion’s share of searches among electronic health records in the United States peaked at 18.9% in April 2026 and was lowest at 14.1% in August 2026.
How did search popularity change for United States electronic health records in September 2026?
6 changes

In September 2026, SimplePractice gained share of searches among electronic health records in the United States, from 25.7% to 28.3%.

In September 2026, Practice Fusion gained share of searches among electronic health records in the United States, from 14.1% to 15.5%.

In September 2026, Oracle Health gained share of searches among electronic health records in the United States, from 2.3% to 3.1%.

In September 2026, AdvancedMD gained share of searches among electronic health records in the United States, from 7.7% to 8.5%.

In September 2026, Athenahealth lost share of searches among electronic health records in the United States, from 31.5% to 28.3%.

In September 2026, Epic Systems lost share of searches among electronic health records in the United States, from 6.3% to 3.8%.
How are Practice Fusion’s branded searches counted?
1 search term
Brandwave collects information about searches that people make online using Practice Fusion’s name. When viewed over time, estimated search volumes for this branded term can be used to understand whether interest in the brand is growing, holding steady, or fading.
- practice fusion
Do you work for Practice Fusion? To request corrections or removal please contact us via our support page and we will be happy to assist.
Where does Practice Fusion compete?
| Competitor set | Rank | Share of searches | Ranking |
|---|---|---|---|
| Electronic health records | 3rd of 12 | 15.5% | Shown above |
| Medical practice management software | 1st of 6 | 45.9% | Show ranking |

Is Practice Fusion your brand?
Put your own campaigns, spend and outcomes next to this demand line, so you can see which of your marketing lined up with the movements above.