Boots vs Lookfantastic:Which is more popular?
In September 2026, Boots had more branded searches than Lookfantastic among beauty boxes in the United Kingdom. Boots had about 8,100 branded searches, while Lookfantastic had 1,600. Boots made up 19.5% of all beauty box searches we track, and Lookfantastic accounted for 3.8%. When we asked ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews about beauty boxes, Lookfantastic appeared in all five answers and Boots in three. Lookfantastic was mentioned before Boots in four out of five answers.
Who do people search for more?
Boots, about 5 searches for every 1 for Lookfantastic
Who does AI mention more?
Lookfantastic, mentioned in every answer we collected
Who does AI recommend more?
Lookfantastic, named ahead of Boots in 4 of 5 answers
Follow Boots vs Lookfantastic and get free monthly updates on what changed
By continuing you'll get index updates and occasional product news from Brandwave. Unsubscribe any time. Privacy
Top beauty boxes in ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews
In three ChatGPT questions and two Google AI Overviews, Lookfantastic appeared in all five answers. Boots was mentioned in three out of five: in one of the three ChatGPT answers and in both Google AI Overviews. Lookfantastic was listed before Boots in four out of five answers.
Most recommended by AI
Brands get a higher ranking if they are mentioned earlier in the answers.
- Lookfantastic1st
GLOSSYBOX2nd- Boots3rd
Next4th
Cult Beauty5th
Liberty London6th
Latest in Beauty7th
M&S–
Birchbox–
John Lewis–
Mentioned by AI
Each dot is one answer, filled in when that answer mentions the brand.
- Lookfantastic5 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 2 of 2 Google answers
- GLOSSYBOX4 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 2 of 2 Google answers
- Boots3 of 5Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 2 of 2 Google answers
- Next2 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 2 of 2 Google answers
- Latest in Beauty1 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
- Liberty London1 of 5Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
- Cult Beauty1 of 5Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
- M&S0 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
- Birchbox0 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
- John Lewis0 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
See every answer about beauty boxes
5 answers
Asked ChatGPT
“What's the best beauty subscription box in the UK?”
Asked ChatGPT
“Which beauty box is worth the money?”
Asked ChatGPT
“What's a good beauty box to give as a gift?”
Searched Google, AI Overview
“beauty box”
Searched Google, AI Overview
“beauty boxes uk”
Not named in any answer:
Brands are shown in the order each answer named them. The survey took place in United Kingdom on October 28, 2026.
Is Boots or Lookfantastic more popular in search?
This chart shows how often people search Google for Boots and Lookfantastic by name. Each line represents a brand's share of searches for all ten beauty box brands we track, month by month, from searches in United Kingdom.
Share of searches by month for Boots, Lookfantastic. The figures are in the table below the chart.
View monthly share of searches table
| Month | GLOSSYBOX | Boots | Next | Latest in Beauty | M&S | Lookfantastic | Birchbox | Liberty London | Cult Beauty | John Lewis |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 2025 | 34.2% | 27.9% | 10.2% | 6.8% | 6.8% | 6.8% | 2.5% | 2% | 1.5% | 1.5% |
| Nov 2025 | 32.7% | 32.7% | 11.9% | 5.3% | 5.3% | 5.3% | 2.4% | 1.3% | 1.7% | 1.5% |
| Dec 2025 | 39.1% | 26.1% | 11.6% | 4.2% | 4.2% | 6.3% | 2.3% | 1.5% | 2.9% | 1.8% |
| Jan 2026 | 37% | 20.2% | 9% | 4.9% | 13.5% | 5.9% | 3.3% | 2.7% | 2% | 1.5% |
| Feb 2026 | 44% | 16% | 13.1% | 4.6% | 5.8% | 5.8% | 3.2% | 1.8% | 3.5% | 2.1% |
| Mar 2026 | 35.9% | 19.7% | 13.1% | 5.8% | 10.7% | 5.8% | 2.6% | 1.7% | 2.1% | 2.6% |
| Apr 2026 | 38.5% | 21.1% | 11.4% | 4.9% | 7.5% | 6.2% | 2.6% | 2.6% | 2.5% | 2.6% |
| May 2026 | 24.7% | 16.5% | 9% | 4.8% | 30.2% | 7.3% | 1.7% | 1.2% | 2.3% | 2.2% |
| Jun 2026 | 32.9% | 18% | 9.8% | 5.3% | 14.7% | 6.4% | 2.2% | 2% | 2.3% | 6.4% |
| Jul 2026 | 26.9% | 32.9% | 9.8% | 5.3% | 8% | 8% | 2% | 2.9% | 2.4% | 2% |
| Aug 2026 | 37% | 24.7% | 9% | 7.4% | 5.9% | 7.4% | 2.7% | 2% | 2.2% | 1.8% |
| Sep 2026 | 43.5% | 19.5% | 10.6% | 7% | 5.8% | 3.8% | 3.1% | 3.1% | 1.8% | 1.7% |
Lookfantastic sells other things too, so only its searches that name this product count here, like “lookfantastic beauty box”.
How has the Boots and Lookfantastic comparison changed over the last 12 months?
3 findings
- Boots was ahead of Lookfantastic in every measured month of the 12 months ending September 2026.
- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, Boots’ share of searches among beauty boxes in the United Kingdom moved from 27.9% to 19.5%, and its estimated monthly branded searches moved from 18.1K to 8.1K.
- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, Lookfantastic’s share of searches among beauty boxes in the United Kingdom moved from 6.8% to 3.8%, and its estimated monthly branded searches moved from 4.4K to 1.6K.
How did search popularity change for United Kingdom beauty boxes in September 2026?
2 changes
In September 2026, Boots lost share of searches among beauty boxes in the United Kingdom, from 24.7% to 19.5%.
In September 2026, Lookfantastic lost share of searches among beauty boxes in the United Kingdom, from 7.4% to 3.8%.
How are branded searches counted?
2 search terms
Brandwave collects information about searches that people make online using Boots’ and Lookfantastic’s names. When viewed over time, estimated search volumes for these branded terms can be used to understand whether interest in the brands is growing, holding steady, or fading.
Boots
1 branded search term
- boots beauty box
Lookfantastic
1 branded search term
- lookfantastic beauty box
Other head-to-heads among beauty boxes
Put your own brand in this comparison
Brandwave tracks your branded demand next to the rival you actually watch, with your campaigns, spend and outcomes on the same timeline.