CMW Geosciences vs Soil & Rock Consultants:Which is more popular?
In September 2026, CMW Geosciences had more branded searches than Soil & Rock Consultants among geotechnical consultancies in New Zealand. CMW Geosciences had about 260 branded searches, while Soil & Rock Consultants had 140. CMW Geosciences made up 5.6% of all geotechnical consultancy searches we track, and Soil & Rock Consultants accounted for 3%. When we asked ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews about geotechnical consultancies, Soil & Rock Consultants appeared in three of the five answers and CMW Geosciences in one. CMW Geosciences and Soil & Rock Consultants were each mentioned first in one of the two answers.
Who do people search for more?
CMW Geosciences, about 86% more searches than Soil & Rock Consultants
Who does AI mention more?
Soil & Rock Consultants, mentioned in 3 of 5 answers, CMW Geosciences in 1
Who does AI recommend more?
Each is named first in 1 of 2 answers.
Follow CMW Geosciences vs Soil & Rock Consultants and get free monthly updates on what changed
By continuing you'll get index updates and occasional product news from Brandwave. Unsubscribe any time. Privacy
Top geotechnical consultancies in ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews
In three ChatGPT questions and two Google AI Overviews, Soil & Rock Consultants was mentioned in three out of five: in two of the three ChatGPT answers and in one of the two Google AI Overviews. CMW Geosciences was mentioned in one out of five: in one of the three ChatGPT answers, but not in either of the two Google AI Overviews. CMW Geosciences and Soil & Rock Consultants were each listed first in one of the two answers.
Most recommended by AI
Brands get a higher ranking if they are mentioned earlier in the answers.
Mentioned by AI
Each dot is one answer, filled in when that answer mentions the brand.
ENGEO3 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
Soil & Rock Consultants3 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
Tonkin + Taylor2 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
CMW Geosciences1 of 5Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
Ground Consulting1 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
Geologix0 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
See every answer about geotechnical consultancies
5 answers
Asked ChatGPT
“Which geotechnical consultancy should I hire in New Zealand?”
Asked ChatGPT
“What are the best geotechnical consultancies in New Zealand?”
Asked ChatGPT
“What's the best geotechnical consultancy in New Zealand for a building site?”
Searched Google, AI Overview
“geotechnical consultants nz”
Searched Google, AI Overview
“ground investigation nz”
Not named in any answer:
Brands are shown in the order each answer named them. The survey took place in New Zealand on October 21, 2026.
Is CMW Geosciences or Soil & Rock Consultants more popular in search?
This chart shows how often people search Google for CMW Geosciences and Soil & Rock Consultants by name. Each line represents a brand's share of searches for all six geotechnical consultancies we track, month by month, from searches in New Zealand.
Share of searches by month for CMW Geosciences, Soil & Rock Consultants. The figures are in the table below the chart.
View monthly share of searches table
| Month | Tonkin + Taylor | ENGEO | CMW Geosciences | Soil & Rock Consultants | Geologix | Ground Consulting |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 2025 | 79.7% | 10.8% | 5.7% | 1.1% | 1.8% | 0.88% |
| Nov 2025 | 80% | 10.9% | 4.7% | 2% | 1.8% | 0.67% |
| Dec 2025 | 80.6% | 9% | 5.7% | 1.7% | 2% | 1% |
| Jan 2026 | 77.6% | 10.7% | 5.6% | 2.9% | 2.4% | 0.8% |
| Feb 2026 | 80.8% | 9% | 4.8% | 2.6% | 2.2% | 0.73% |
| Mar 2026 | 80.1% | 8.9% | 5.8% | 2.5% | 2.2% | 0.54% |
| Apr 2026 | 78.8% | 10.7% | 5.7% | 2% | 2.3% | 0.53% |
| May 2026 | 73.7% | 12.2% | 7.9% | 2.9% | 2.4% | 0.81% |
| Jun 2026 | 80.3% | 8.7% | 5.8% | 2% | 2.2% | 0.91% |
| Jul 2026 | 82.2% | 9.1% | 3.9% | 2% | 2% | 0.74% |
| Aug 2026 | 86% | 6.2% | 4.1% | 1.4% | 1.7% | 0.48% |
| Sep 2026 | 78% | 10.6% | 5.6% | 3% | 2.2% | 0.65% |
How has the CMW Geosciences and Soil & Rock Consultants comparison changed over the last 12 months?
3 findings
- CMW Geosciences was ahead of Soil & Rock Consultants in every measured month of the 12 months ending September 2026.
- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, CMW Geosciences’ share of searches among geotechnical consultancies in New Zealand moved from 5.7% to 5.6%, and its estimated monthly branded searches held steady at 260.
- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, Soil & Rock Consultants’ share of searches among geotechnical consultancies in New Zealand moved from 1.1% to 3%, and its estimated monthly branded searches moved from 50 to 140.
How did search popularity change for New Zealand geotechnical consultancies in September 2026?
2 changes

In September 2026, Soil & Rock Consultants overtook Geologix to rank 4th among geotechnical consultancies in New Zealand, with 3% of the searches.

In September 2026, CMW Geosciences gained share of searches among geotechnical consultancies in New Zealand, from 4.1% to 5.6%.
How are branded searches counted?
3 search terms
Brandwave collects information about searches that people make online using CMW Geosciences’ and Soil & Rock Consultants’ names. When viewed over time, estimated search volumes for these branded terms can be used to understand whether interest in the brands is growing, holding steady, or fading.
CMW Geosciences
2 branded search terms
- cmw geosciences
- cmwgeosciences
Soil & Rock Consultants
1 branded search term
- soil and rock consultants
Other head-to-heads among geotechnical consultancies

Tonkin + Taylor vs ENGEO: compare popularity
Tonkin + Taylor vs CMW Geosciences: compare popularity
Tonkin + Taylor vs Soil & Rock Consultants: compare popularity
Tonkin + Taylor vs Geologix: compare popularity
ENGEO vs CMW Geosciences: compare popularity
ENGEO vs Soil & Rock Consultants: compare popularity

Put your own brand in this comparison
Brandwave tracks your branded demand next to the rival you actually watch, with your campaigns, spend and outcomes on the same timeline.