Trint vs TurboScribe:Which is more popular?
In September 2026, TurboScribe had more branded searches than Trint among audio and video transcription platforms worldwide. TurboScribe had about 1 million branded searches, while Trint had 19,400. TurboScribe made up 52.9% of all audio and video transcription platform searches we track, and Trint accounted for 1%. When we asked ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews about audio and video transcription platforms, TurboScribe appeared in four of the five answers and Trint in one. TurboScribe was mentioned before Trint in every answer that named either.
Who do people search for more?
TurboScribe, about 51 searches for every 1 for Trint
Who does AI mention more?
TurboScribe, mentioned in 4 of 5 answers, Trint in 1
Who does AI recommend more?
TurboScribe, named ahead of Trint in 4 of 4 answers
Follow Trint vs TurboScribe and get free monthly updates on what changed
By continuing you'll get index updates and occasional product news from Brandwave. Unsubscribe any time. Privacy
Top audio and video transcription platforms in ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews
In three ChatGPT questions and two Google AI Overviews, TurboScribe was mentioned in four out of five: in all three ChatGPT answers and in one of the two Google AI Overviews. Trint was mentioned in one out of five: in one of the three ChatGPT answers, but not in either of the two Google AI Overviews. TurboScribe was listed before Trint in every answer that named either.
Most recommended by AI
Brands get a higher ranking if they are mentioned earlier in the answers.
Descript1st
Otter2nd- TurboScribe3rd
Rev4th
Happy Scribe5th
Sonix6th
Trint7th
Mentioned by AI
Each dot is one answer, filled in when that answer mentions the brand.
- TurboScribe4 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
- Otter4 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
- Descript4 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
- Rev4 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
- Sonix3 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
- Happy Scribe1 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
- Trint1 of 5Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
See every answer about audio and video transcription platforms
5 answers
Asked ChatGPT
“Which audio video transcription platform should I use?”
Asked ChatGPT
“What are the best audio video transcription platforms?”
Asked ChatGPT
“What's the best audio video transcription platform for turning recordings into text?”
Searched Google, AI Overview
“audio video transcription”
Searched Google, AI Overview
“best transcription software”
Brands are shown in the order each answer named them. The survey took place in the United States on October 20, 2026.
Is Trint or TurboScribe more popular in search?
This chart shows how often people search Google for Trint and TurboScribe by name. Each line represents a brand's share of searches for all seven audio and video transcription platforms we track, month by month, from English-language searches worldwide.
Share of searches by month for TurboScribe, Trint. The figures are in the table below the chart.
View monthly share of searches table
| Month | TurboScribe | Otter | Descript | Happy Scribe | Sonix | Rev | Trint |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 2025 | 39% | 26.9% | 18% | 6.5% | 5% | 3.3% | 1.4% |
| Nov 2025 | 42.1% | 23.9% | 19.5% | 5.7% | 5.4% | 2% | 1.5% |
| Dec 2025 | 41.8% | 23.7% | 19.4% | 5.7% | 6.2% | 2.1% | 1.2% |
| Jan 2026 | 37.9% | 26.4% | 21.4% | 5.2% | 5.6% | 2.1% | 1.3% |
| Feb 2026 | 37.9% | 26.8% | 21.5% | 5.2% | 5.7% | 1.7% | 1.1% |
| Mar 2026 | 44.8% | 25.8% | 16.9% | 5% | 4.7% | 1.7% | 1.1% |
| Apr 2026 | 45.1% | 25.8% | 17% | 5% | 4.6% | 1.7% | 0.88% |
| May 2026 | 49.3% | 23.3% | 15.4% | 4.5% | 4.7% | 1.8% | 0.96% |
| Jun 2026 | 52.1% | 20.1% | 16.3% | 3.9% | 4.3% | 2.2% | 1% |
| Jul 2026 | 48.1% | 22.5% | 18.4% | 3.6% | 4% | 2.5% | 0.93% |
| Aug 2026 | 48.1% | 22.3% | 18.4% | 3.6% | 3.9% | 2.8% | 0.93% |
| Sep 2026 | 52.9% | 20.2% | 16.3% | 4% | 3.7% | 1.9% | 1% |
How has the Trint and TurboScribe comparison changed over the last 12 months?
3 findings
- TurboScribe was ahead of Trint in every measured month of the 12 months ending September 2026.
- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, Trint’s share of searches among audio and video transcription platforms worldwide moved from 1.4% to 1%, and its estimated monthly branded searches moved from 29.1K to 19.4K.
- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, TurboScribe’s share of searches among audio and video transcription platforms worldwide moved from 39% to 52.9%, and its estimated monthly branded searches moved from 823K to 1M.
How did search popularity change for audio and video transcription platforms worldwide in September 2026?
2 changes
In September 2026, TurboScribe gained share of searches among audio and video transcription platforms worldwide, from 48.1% to 52.9%.
Estimated monthly branded searches for Trint worldwide fell 33.1% over 12 measured months, from 29.1K to 19.4K in September 2026.
How are branded searches counted?
9 search terms
Brandwave collects information about searches that people make online using Trint’s and TurboScribe’s names. When viewed over time, estimated search volumes for these branded terms can be used to understand whether interest in the brands is growing, holding steady, or fading.
Trint
8 branded search terms
- transcription trint
- trint
- trint ai
- trint ai transcription
- trint app
- trint audio transcription
- trint software
- trint transcribe
TurboScribe
1 branded search term
- turboscribe
Other head-to-heads among audio and video transcription platforms
Put your own brand in this comparison
Brandwave tracks your branded demand next to the rival you actually watch, with your campaigns, spend and outcomes on the same timeline.