SportLoMo vs TeamSnap:Which is searched more?
In September 2026, TeamSnap had more branded searches than SportLoMo among sports league management software worldwide. TeamSnap had about 201,000 branded searches, while SportLoMo had 18,100. TeamSnap made up 23.1% of all sports league management software searches we track, and SportLoMo accounted for 2.1%. These are worldwide searches for English-language branded terms.
Follow SportLoMo vs TeamSnap and get free monthly updates on what changed
By continuing you'll get index updates and occasional product news from Brandwave. Unsubscribe any time. Privacy
Is SportLoMo or TeamSnap more popular in search?
Compare the platforms sports clubs and leagues run registrations, teams and payments on. Branded searches tell you how often people look for a brand by name or related terms. Comparing these searches across competitors helps you see how popular each brand is over time.
Share of searches by month for TeamSnap, SportLoMo. The figures are in the table below the chart.
View monthly share of searches table
| Month | PlayHQ | Spond | TeamSnap | SportsEngine | Pitchero | SportLoMo | TeamSideline | LeagueApps | Demosphere | Heja | Stack Sports | Jersey Watch |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 2025 | 42.7% | 19.1% | 19.1% | 12.8% | 1.4% | 1.4% | 0.94% | 0.94% | 0.94% | 0.28% | 0.28% | 0.15% |
| Nov 2025 | 38.4% | 21% | 21% | 14.1% | 1.5% | 1% | 0.69% | 0.84% | 0.84% | 0.25% | 0.3% | 0.1% |
| Dec 2025 | 28.5% | 23.4% | 19.1% | 23.4% | 1.1% | 0.93% | 0.93% | 1.1% | 0.76% | 0.23% | 0.34% | 0.23% |
| Jan 2026 | 25.4% | 25.4% | 20.9% | 20.9% | 1.5% | 1.3% | 1.3% | 1.3% | 1% | 0.3% | 0.56% | 0.2% |
| Feb 2026 | 41% | 22.4% | 18.4% | 12.3% | 1.3% | 0.9% | 1.1% | 1.1% | 0.6% | 0.27% | 0.4% | 0.21% |
| Mar 2026 | 39.1% | 21.4% | 21.4% | 11.7% | 1.3% | 0.86% | 1.3% | 1.3% | 0.7% | 0.38% | 0.47% | 0.2% |
| Apr 2026 | 45.7% | 20.4% | 16.8% | 11.2% | 1.5% | 0.67% | 1.2% | 1.2% | 0.45% | 0.37% | 0.37% | 0.16% |
| May 2026 | 51.2% | 18.7% | 15.4% | 10.2% | 1.1% | 0.5% | 0.92% | 0.92% | 0.34% | 0.27% | 0.27% | 0.15% |
| Jun 2026 | 45.6% | 20.5% | 16.7% | 11.2% | 1.5% | 0.55% | 1.2% | 1.5% | 0.36% | 0.3% | 0.36% | 0.2% |
| Jul 2026 | 42.5% | 23.3% | 15.5% | 12.8% | 1.4% | 0.51% | 1.1% | 1.7% | 0.34% | 0.27% | 0.41% | 0.23% |
| Aug 2026 | 45% | 20.1% | 20.1% | 9.1% | 1.2% | 0.99% | 1.2% | 1.2% | 0.24% | 0.29% | 0.36% | 0.16% |
| Sep 2026 | 28.2% | 28.2% | 23.1% | 12.6% | 2.1% | 2.1% | 1.4% | 1.1% | 0.41% | 0.28% | 0.28% | 0.15% |
How has the SportLoMo and TeamSnap comparison changed over the last 12 months?
3 findings
- TeamSnap was ahead of SportLoMo in every measured month of the 12 months ending September 2026.
- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, SportLoMo’s share of searches among sports league management software worldwide moved from 1.4% to 2.1%, and its estimated monthly branded searches moved from 14.8K to 18.1K.
- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, TeamSnap’s share of searches among sports league management software worldwide moved from 19.1% to 23.1%, and its estimated monthly branded searches held steady at 201K.
How did search popularity change for sports league management software worldwide in September 2026?
2 changes

In September 2026, SportLoMo overtook LeagueApps and TeamSideline to rank 6th among sports league management software worldwide, with 2.1% of the searches.

In September 2026, TeamSnap gained share of searches among sports league management software worldwide, from 20.1% to 23.1%.
How are branded searches counted?
2 search terms
Brandwave collects information about searches that people make online using SportLoMo’s and TeamSnap’s names. When viewed over time, estimated search volumes for these branded terms can be used to understand whether interest in the brands is growing, holding steady, or fading.
Other head-to-heads among sports league management software

Put your own brand in this comparison
Brandwave tracks your branded demand next to the rival you actually watch, with your campaigns, spend and outcomes on the same timeline.