How popular isTeamSnap?
In September 2026, people searched for TeamSnap by name about 201,000 times worldwide, about the same as the previous year. These searches made up 23.1% of all global sports league management software searches, placing TeamSnap third out of 12 brands. When we asked both ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews about sports league management software, TeamSnap appeared in four of the five answers and was the third most recommended of the 12.
TeamSnap is the third most searched of 12 competitors and the third most recommended in AI answers.
PlayHQShare of searches 28.2%Mentioned in 0 of 5 AI answersPlace in AI recommendations –
SpondShare of searches 28.2%Mentioned in 0 of 5 AI answersPlace in AI recommendations –
TeamSnapShare of searches 23.1%Mentioned in 4 of 5 AI answersPlace in AI recommendations 3rd
SportsEngineShare of searches 12.6%Mentioned in 4 of 5 AI answersPlace in AI recommendations 1st
PitcheroShare of searches 2.1%Mentioned in 0 of 5 AI answersPlace in AI recommendations –
Follow TeamSnap and get free monthly updates on what changed
By continuing you'll get index updates and occasional product news from Brandwave. Unsubscribe any time. Privacy
Top sports league management software in ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews
In three ChatGPT questions and two Google AI Overviews, TeamSnap was mentioned in four out of five: in all three ChatGPT answers and in one of the two Google AI Overviews. TeamSnap is the third most recommended of the 12.
Most recommended by AI
Brands get a higher ranking if they are mentioned earlier in the answers.
Mentioned by AI
Each dot is one answer, filled in when that answer mentions the brand.
TeamSnap4 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
SportsEngine4 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
LeagueApps4 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 2 of 2 Google answers
TeamSideline2 of 5Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
Jersey Watch2 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
PlayHQ0 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
Spond0 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
Pitchero0 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
SportLoMo0 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
Demosphere0 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
See every answer about sports league management software
5 answers
Asked ChatGPT
“Which sports league management software should I use?”
Asked ChatGPT
“What are the best sports league management platforms?”
Asked ChatGPT
“What's the best sports league management software for a youth soccer club?”
Searched Google, AI Overview
“sports league management software”
Searched Google, AI Overview
“youth sports software”
Not named in any answer:
Brands are shown in the order each answer named them. The survey took place in the United States on October 22, 2026.
Which sports league management software compete with TeamSnap?
Share of searches by month for PlayHQ, Spond, TeamSnap, SportsEngine, Pitchero, SportLoMo. The figures are in the table below the chart.
View monthly share of searches table
| Month | PlayHQ | Spond | TeamSnap | SportsEngine | Pitchero | SportLoMo | TeamSideline | LeagueApps | Demosphere | Heja | Stack Sports | Jersey Watch |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 2025 | 42.7% | 19.1% | 19.1% | 12.8% | 1.4% | 1.4% | 0.94% | 0.94% | 0.94% | 0.28% | 0.28% | 0.15% |
| Nov 2025 | 38.4% | 21% | 21% | 14.1% | 1.5% | 1% | 0.69% | 0.84% | 0.84% | 0.25% | 0.3% | 0.1% |
| Dec 2025 | 28.5% | 23.4% | 19.1% | 23.4% | 1.1% | 0.93% | 0.93% | 1.1% | 0.76% | 0.23% | 0.34% | 0.23% |
| Jan 2026 | 25.4% | 25.4% | 20.9% | 20.9% | 1.5% | 1.3% | 1.3% | 1.3% | 1% | 0.3% | 0.56% | 0.2% |
| Feb 2026 | 41% | 22.4% | 18.4% | 12.3% | 1.3% | 0.9% | 1.1% | 1.1% | 0.6% | 0.27% | 0.4% | 0.21% |
| Mar 2026 | 39.1% | 21.4% | 21.4% | 11.7% | 1.3% | 0.86% | 1.3% | 1.3% | 0.7% | 0.38% | 0.47% | 0.2% |
| Apr 2026 | 45.7% | 20.4% | 16.8% | 11.2% | 1.5% | 0.67% | 1.2% | 1.2% | 0.45% | 0.37% | 0.37% | 0.16% |
| May 2026 | 51.2% | 18.7% | 15.4% | 10.2% | 1.1% | 0.5% | 0.92% | 0.92% | 0.34% | 0.27% | 0.27% | 0.15% |
| Jun 2026 | 45.6% | 20.5% | 16.7% | 11.2% | 1.5% | 0.55% | 1.2% | 1.5% | 0.36% | 0.3% | 0.36% | 0.2% |
| Jul 2026 | 42.5% | 23.3% | 15.5% | 12.8% | 1.4% | 0.51% | 1.1% | 1.7% | 0.34% | 0.27% | 0.41% | 0.23% |
| Aug 2026 | 45% | 20.1% | 20.1% | 9.1% | 1.2% | 0.99% | 1.2% | 1.2% | 0.24% | 0.29% | 0.36% | 0.16% |
| Sep 2026 | 28.2% | 28.2% | 23.1% | 12.6% | 2.1% | 2.1% | 1.4% | 1.1% | 0.41% | 0.28% | 0.28% | 0.15% |
| Rank | Brand | Share of searches | Estimated monthly branded searches | vs prior month | Share change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1, held 1st | 28.2% | 246K | -45.3% | -16.8 points | |
| 2, held 2nd | 28.2% | 246K | +22.4% | +8.1 points | |
| 3, held 3rd | 23.1% | 201K | 0% | +3 points | |
| 4, held 4th | 12.6% | 110K | +21.5% | +3.6 points | |
| 5, moved from 6th to 5th | 2.1% | 18.1K | +49.6% | +0.9 pointsmoved from 6th to 5th | |
| 6, moved from 8th to 6th | 2.1% | 18.1K | +82.8% | +1.1 pointsmoved from 8th to 6th | |
| 7, held 7th | 1.4% | 12.1K | 0% | +0.2 points | |
| 8, moved from 5th to 8th | 1.1% | 9.9K | -18.2% | -0.1 pointsmoved from 5th to 8th | |
| 9, moved from 11th to 9th | 0.41% | 3.6K | +50% | +0.2 pointsmoved from 11th to 9th | |
| 10, held 10th | 0.28% | 2.4K | -17.2% | 0 points | |
| 11, moved from 9th to 11th | 0.28% | 2.4K | -33.3% | -0.1 pointsmoved from 9th to 11th | |
| 12, held 12th | 0.15% | 1.3K | -18.8% | 0 points |
1.
PlayHQ28.2%
Held 1st. 246K estimated branded searches, -45.3% vs prior month. Share -16.8 points.
2.
Spond28.2%
Held 2nd. 246K estimated branded searches, +22.4% vs prior month. Share +8.1 points.
3.
TeamSnap23.1%
Held 3rd. 201K estimated branded searches, 0% vs prior month. Share +3 points.
12.6%
Held 4th. 110K estimated branded searches, +21.5% vs prior month. Share +3.6 points.
5.
Pitchero2.1%
Moved from 6th to 5th. 18.1K estimated branded searches, +49.6% vs prior month. Share +0.9 points.
2.1%
Moved from 8th to 6th. 18.1K estimated branded searches, +82.8% vs prior month. Share +1.1 points.
1.4%
Held 7th. 12.1K estimated branded searches, 0% vs prior month. Share +0.2 points.
1.1%
Moved from 5th to 8th. 9.9K estimated branded searches, -18.2% vs prior month. Share -0.1 points.
0.41%
Moved from 11th to 9th. 3.6K estimated branded searches, +50% vs prior month. Share +0.2 points.
10.
Heja0.28%
Held 10th. 2.4K estimated branded searches, -17.2% vs prior month. Share 0 points.
11.
Stack Sports0.28%
Moved from 9th to 11th. 2.4K estimated branded searches, -33.3% vs prior month. Share -0.1 points.
12.
Jersey Watch0.15%
Held 12th. 1.3K estimated branded searches, -18.8% vs prior month. Share 0 points.
Compare popularity between TeamSnap and its closest rivals
Every comparison with TeamSnap
19 comparisons
- PlayHQ vs TeamSnap
- Spond vs TeamSnap
- SportsEngine vs TeamSnap
- Pitchero vs TeamSnap
- SportLoMo vs TeamSnap
- TeamSideline vs TeamSnap
- ClubSpark vs TeamSnap
- Perfect Gym vs TeamSnap
- TeamSnap vs Wild Apricot
- LeagueApps vs TeamSnap
- Demosphere vs TeamSnap
- Heja vs TeamSnap
- Stack Sports vs TeamSnap
- Clubessential vs TeamSnap
- ClubExpress vs TeamSnap
- Jersey Watch vs TeamSnap
- MemberClicks vs TeamSnap
- Jonas Club Software vs TeamSnap
- Jonas Fitness vs TeamSnap
How has branded search demand for TeamSnap changed worldwide over the last 12 months?
3 findings
- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, estimated monthly branded searches for TeamSnap worldwide held steady at 201K.
- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, TeamSnap’s share of searches among sports league management software worldwide increased from 19.1% to 23.1%.
- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, TeamSnap’s share of searches among sports league management software worldwide peaked at 23.1% in September 2026 and was lowest at 15.4% in May 2026.
How did search popularity change for sports league management software worldwide in September 2026?
6 changes

In September 2026, Pitchero overtook LeagueApps to rank 5th among sports league management software worldwide, with 2.1% of the searches.

In September 2026, SportLoMo overtook LeagueApps and TeamSideline to rank 6th among sports league management software worldwide, with 2.1% of the searches.

In September 2026, Spond gained share of searches among sports league management software worldwide, from 20.1% to 28.2%.

In September 2026, SportsEngine gained share of searches among sports league management software worldwide, from 9.1% to 12.6%.

In September 2026, TeamSnap gained share of searches among sports league management software worldwide, from 20.1% to 23.1%.

In September 2026, PlayHQ lost share of searches among sports league management software worldwide, from 45% to 28.2%.
How are TeamSnap’s branded searches counted?
1 search term
Brandwave collects information about searches that people make online using TeamSnap’s name. When viewed over time, estimated search volumes for this branded term can be used to understand whether interest in the brand is growing, holding steady, or fading.
- teamsnap
Do you work for TeamSnap? To request corrections or removal please contact us via our support page and we will be happy to assist.
Where does TeamSnap compete?
| Competitor set | Rank | Share of searches | Ranking |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sports league management software | 3rd of 12 | 23.1% | Shown above |
| Club management software | 1st of 9 | 84.9% | Show ranking |

Is TeamSnap your brand?
Put your own campaigns, spend and outcomes next to this demand line, so you can see which of your marketing lined up with the movements above.