Nabla vs TranscribeMe:Which is searched more?
In September 2026, TranscribeMe had more branded searches than Nabla among medical transcription services worldwide. TranscribeMe had about 135,000 branded searches, while Nabla had 1,600. TranscribeMe made up 45.1% of all medical transcription service searches we track, and Nabla accounted for 0.53%. These are worldwide searches for English-language branded terms.
Follow Nabla vs TranscribeMe and get free monthly updates on what changed
By continuing you'll get index updates and occasional product news from Brandwave. Unsubscribe any time. Privacy
Is Nabla or TranscribeMe more popular in search?
Compare the services that transcribe clinical notes. Branded searches tell you how often people look for a brand by name or related terms. Comparing these searches across competitors helps you see how popular each brand is over time.
Share of searches by month for TranscribeMe, Nabla. The figures are in the table below the chart.
View monthly share of searches table
| Month | TranscribeMD | TranscribeMe | Amphion | Dragon Medical One | Freed | iMedX | Nabla | M*Modal | Nuance |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 2025 | 41.9% | 41.9% | 8.5% | 3.1% | 2.4% | 0.72% | 0.61% | 0.59% | 0.3% |
| Nov 2025 | 42.6% | 42.6% | 8.6% | 2.1% | 2.1% | 0.74% | 0.62% | 0.49% | 0.18% |
| Dec 2025 | 41.6% | 41.6% | 8.3% | 2.5% | 3.6% | 0.74% | 0.87% | 0.58% | 0.28% |
| Jan 2026 | 43.1% | 43.1% | 7.1% | 2.1% | 2.6% | 0.61% | 0.61% | 0.54% | 0.23% |
| Feb 2026 | 43.2% | 43.2% | 7.1% | 2.1% | 2.1% | 0.75% | 0.63% | 0.64% | 0.26% |
| Mar 2026 | 43.2% | 43.2% | 7.1% | 2.6% | 1.8% | 0.61% | 0.61% | 0.42% | 0.46% |
| Apr 2026 | 44.7% | 44.7% | 6% | 1.5% | 1.5% | 0.52% | 0.52% | 0.34% | 0.17% |
| May 2026 | 42.3% | 42.3% | 10.4% | 1.7% | 1.6% | 0.5% | 0.6% | 0.41% | 0.24% |
| Jun 2026 | 44.9% | 44.9% | 4.9% | 1.8% | 1.7% | 0.53% | 0.63% | 0.4% | 0.23% |
| Jul 2026 | 45.9% | 45.9% | 2.8% | 1.5% | 2.5% | 0.45% | 0.45% | 0.32% | 0.16% |
| Aug 2026 | 45.5% | 45.5% | 4.1% | 1.5% | 1.7% | 0.54% | 0.54% | 0.45% | 0.19% |
| Sep 2026 | 45.1% | 45.1% | 4.9% | 1.8% | 1.4% | 0.53% | 0.53% | 0.42% | 0.19% |
How has the Nabla and TranscribeMe comparison changed over the last 12 months?
3 findings
- TranscribeMe was ahead of Nabla in every measured month of the 12 months ending September 2026.
- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, Nabla’s share of searches among medical transcription services worldwide moved from 0.61% to 0.53%, and its estimated monthly branded searches held steady at 1.6K.
- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, TranscribeMe’s share of searches among medical transcription services worldwide moved from 41.9% to 45.1%, and its estimated monthly branded searches moved from 110K to 135K.
How did search popularity change for medical transcription services worldwide in September 2026?
1 change
Estimated monthly branded searches for TranscribeMe worldwide rose 22.7% over 12 measured months, from 110K to 135K in September 2026.
How are branded searches counted?
2 search terms
Brandwave collects information about searches that people make online using Nabla’s and TranscribeMe’s names. When viewed over time, estimated search volumes for these branded terms can be used to understand whether interest in the brands is growing, holding steady, or fading.
Nabla
1 branded search term
- nabla ai
TranscribeMe
1 branded search term
- transcribeme
Other head-to-heads among medical transcription services
Put your own brand in this comparison
Brandwave tracks your branded demand next to the rival you actually watch, with your campaigns, spend and outcomes on the same timeline.