Brandwave

Amphion vs TranscribeMe:Which is more popular?

In September 2026, TranscribeMe had more branded searches than Amphion among medical transcription services worldwide. TranscribeMe had about 135,000 branded searches, while Amphion had 14,800. TranscribeMe made up 45.1% of all medical transcription service searches we track, and Amphion accounted for 4.9%. When we asked ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews about medical transcription services, TranscribeMe appeared in two of the four answers and Amphion in none.

Among medical transcription services worldwide in September 2026

Who do people search for more?

TranscribeMe, about 9 searches for every 1 for Amphion

TranscribeMe 135K searchesAmphion 14.8K searches

Who does AI mention more?

TranscribeMe, mentioned in 2 of 4 answers, Amphion in 0

TranscribeMe in 2 of 4Amphion in 0 of 4

Who does AI recommend more?

TranscribeMe, the only one of the two named

TranscribeMe first in 2Amphion never named

Follow Amphion vs TranscribeMe and get free monthly updates on what changed

By continuing you'll get index updates and occasional product news from Brandwave. Unsubscribe any time. Privacy

Track your brand against a rival →

Top medical transcription services in ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews

In three ChatGPT questions and one Google AI Overview, TranscribeMe was mentioned in two out of four: in two of the three ChatGPT answers, but not in the Google AI Overview. Amphion did not appear in any of the four answers.

Most recommended by AI

Brands get a higher ranking if they are mentioned earlier in the answers.

  1. Nabla1st
  2. TranscribeMe2nd
  3. Freed3rd
  4. Dragon Medical One4th
  5. TranscribeMD–
  6. Amphion–
  7. iMedX–
  8. M*Modal–
  9. Nuance–

Mentioned by AI

Each dot is one answer, filled in when that answer mentions the brand.

  • TranscribeMe2 of 4Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 1 Google answers
  • Dragon Medical One2 of 4Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 1 Google answers
  • Freed2 of 4Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 1 Google answers
  • Nabla2 of 4Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 1 Google answers
  • TranscribeMD0 of 4Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 1 Google answers
  • Amphion0 of 4Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 1 Google answers
  • iMedX0 of 4Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 1 Google answers
  • M*Modal0 of 4Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 1 Google answers
  • Nuance0 of 4Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 1 Google answers

See every answer about medical transcription services

4 answers

  • Asked ChatGPT

    “Which medical transcription service should I use?”

    1. 1Nabla
    2. 2TranscribeMe
    3. 3Dragon Medical One

  • Asked ChatGPT

    “What are the best medical transcription services?”

    1. 1TranscribeMe
    2. 2Freed
    3. 3Dragon Medical One

  • Asked ChatGPT

    “What's the best medical transcription service for clinical notes?”

    1. 1Nabla
    2. 2Freed

  • Searched Google, AI Overview

    “medical transcription services”

    1. Searched Google, AI Overview

      “healthcare transcription service”

      Google showed no AI Overview for this search.

    Not named in any answer:

    Brands are shown in the order each answer named them. The survey took place in the United States on October 21, 2026.

    Is Amphion or TranscribeMe more popular in search?

    This chart shows how often people search Google for Amphion and TranscribeMe by name. Each line represents a brand's share of searches for all nine medical transcription services we track, month by month, from English-language searches worldwide.

    Amphion and TranscribeMe among medical transcription services worldwide, by month

    Share of searches by month for TranscribeMe, Amphion. The figures are in the table below the chart.

    View monthly share of searches table
    MonthTranscribeMDTranscribeMeAmphionDragon Medical OneFreediMedXNablaM*ModalNuance
    Oct 202541.9%41.9%8.5%3.1%2.4%0.72%0.61%0.59%0.3%
    Nov 202542.6%42.6%8.6%2.1%2.1%0.74%0.62%0.49%0.18%
    Dec 202541.6%41.6%8.3%2.5%3.6%0.74%0.87%0.58%0.28%
    Jan 202643.1%43.1%7.1%2.1%2.6%0.61%0.61%0.54%0.23%
    Feb 202643.2%43.2%7.1%2.1%2.1%0.75%0.63%0.64%0.26%
    Mar 202643.2%43.2%7.1%2.6%1.8%0.61%0.61%0.42%0.46%
    Apr 202644.7%44.7%6%1.5%1.5%0.52%0.52%0.34%0.17%
    May 202642.3%42.3%10.4%1.7%1.6%0.5%0.6%0.41%0.24%
    Jun 202644.9%44.9%4.9%1.8%1.7%0.53%0.63%0.4%0.23%
    Jul 202645.9%45.9%2.8%1.5%2.5%0.45%0.45%0.32%0.16%
    Aug 202645.5%45.5%4.1%1.5%1.7%0.54%0.54%0.45%0.19%
    Sep 202645.1%45.1%4.9%1.8%1.4%0.53%0.53%0.42%0.19%

    How has the Amphion and TranscribeMe comparison changed over the last 12 months?

    3 findings

    How did search popularity change for medical transcription services worldwide in September 2026?

    2 changes

    1. In September 2026, Amphion gained share of searches among medical transcription services worldwide, from 4.1% to 4.9%.

    2. Estimated monthly branded searches for TranscribeMe worldwide rose 22.7% over 12 measured months, from 110K to 135K in September 2026.

    How are branded searches counted?

    2 search terms

    Brandwave collects information about searches that people make online using Amphion’s and TranscribeMe’s names. When viewed over time, estimated search volumes for these branded terms can be used to understand whether interest in the brands is growing, holding steady, or fading.

    Amphion

    1 branded search term

    • amphion

    TranscribeMe

    1 branded search term

    • transcribeme

    How the Brand Demand Index is measured

    Other head-to-heads among medical transcription services

    Creator with pink hair and a pink jacket

    Put your own brand in this comparison

    Brandwave tracks your branded demand next to the rival you actually watch, with your campaigns, spend and outcomes on the same timeline.

    Start free