Missoma vs Pandora:Which is more popular?
In September 2026, Pandora had more branded searches than Missoma among jewellery brands worldwide. Pandora had about 1.6 million branded searches, while Missoma had 74,000. Pandora made up 13% of all jewellery brand searches we track, and Missoma accounted for 0.62%. When we asked ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews about jewellery brands, Pandora appeared in three of the five answers and Missoma in two. Pandora was mentioned before Missoma in two out of three answers that named either.
Who do people search for more?
Pandora, about 21 searches for every 1 for Missoma
Who does AI mention more?
Pandora, mentioned in 3 of 5 answers, Missoma in 2
Who does AI recommend more?
Pandora, named ahead of Missoma in 2 of 3 answers
Follow Missoma vs Pandora and get free monthly updates on what changed
By continuing you'll get index updates and occasional product news from Brandwave. Unsubscribe any time. Privacy
Top jewellery brands in ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews
In three ChatGPT questions and two Google AI Overviews, Pandora was mentioned in three out of five: in all three ChatGPT answers, but not in either of the two Google AI Overviews. Missoma was mentioned in two out of five: in two of the three ChatGPT answers, but not in either of the two Google AI Overviews. Pandora was listed before Missoma in two out of three answers that named either.
Most recommended by AI
Brands get a higher ranking if they are mentioned earlier in the answers.
Cartier1st
Tiffany & Co.2nd
Mejuri3rd
Van Cleef & Arpels4th
Pandora5th
Bulgari6th
Gorjana7th
Missoma7th
Harry Winston9th
David Yurman10th- +3 more
Mentioned by AI
Each dot is one answer, filled in when that answer mentions the brand.
Cartier4 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 2 of 2 Google answers
Tiffany & Co.4 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 2 of 2 Google answers
Mejuri4 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
Pandora3 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
Van Cleef & Arpels3 of 5Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 2 of 2 Google answers
Bulgari3 of 5Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 2 of 2 Google answers
David Yurman2 of 5Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
Gorjana2 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
Harry Winston2 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 2 of 2 Google answers
Missoma2 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
See every answer about jewellery brands
5 answers
Asked ChatGPT
“Which jewellery brand should I buy?”
Asked ChatGPT
“What are the best jewellery brands?”
Asked ChatGPT
“What's the best jewellery brand for everyday wear?”
Searched Google, AI Overview
“jewellery brands”
Searched Google, AI Overview
“fine jewellery”
Not named in any answer:
Brands are shown in the order each answer named them. The survey took place in the United States on October 19, 2026.
Is Missoma or Pandora more popular in search?
This chart shows how often people search Google for Missoma and Pandora by name. Each line represents a brand's share of searches for all 13 jewellery brands we track, month by month, from English-language searches worldwide.
Share of searches by month for Pandora, Missoma. The figures are in the table below the chart.
View monthly share of searches table
| Month | Swarovski | Cartier | Pandora | Tiffany & Co. | David Yurman | Van Cleef & Arpels | Mejuri | Bulgari | Gorjana | Harry Winston | Missoma | Catbird | Meadowlark |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 2025 | 31.6% | 25.9% | 12% | 12.8% | 4.3% | 2.8% | 3.5% | 2.8% | 1.9% | 1.6% | 0.57% | 0.27% | <0.01% |
| Nov 2025 | 33.9% | 18.6% | 19.2% | 11.1% | 4.6% | 2% | 4.6% | 2% | 2% | 0.91% | 0.75% | 0.32% | <0.01% |
| Dec 2025 | 34.8% | 15.6% | 21.3% | 11.4% | 5.7% | 2.1% | 3.1% | 2.1% | 2.1% | 1.1% | 0.51% | 0.26% | <0.01% |
| Jan 2026 | 34.9% | 23.4% | 13.2% | 11.5% | 4.7% | 2.6% | 3.1% | 2.6% | 1.7% | 1.4% | 0.52% | 0.26% | <0.01% |
| Feb 2026 | 38.1% | 20.9% | 12.7% | 12.5% | 4.2% | 2.3% | 3.4% | 2.3% | 1.9% | 1% | 0.46% | 0.24% | <0.01% |
| Mar 2026 | 34.1% | 22.9% | 12.9% | 11.3% | 4.6% | 3.1% | 3.8% | 3.1% | 2.1% | 1.4% | 0.62% | 0.27% | <0.01% |
| Apr 2026 | 33.5% | 22.5% | 11.3% | 13.4% | 5.5% | 3% | 3.7% | 3% | 2% | 1.4% | 0.5% | 0.26% | <0.01% |
| May 2026 | 34.6% | 23.2% | 14.1% | 11.3% | 4.7% | 2.5% | 3.1% | 2.5% | 2.1% | 1.1% | 0.51% | 0.27% | <0.01% |
| Jun 2026 | 33.6% | 22.5% | 15.6% | 11.2% | 4.5% | 3% | 3% | 2.5% | 2% | 1.1% | 0.61% | 0.26% | <0.01% |
| Jul 2026 | 33.5% | 22.5% | 13.7% | 13.2% | 4.5% | 3% | 3% | 2.5% | 2% | 1.1% | 0.61% | 0.32% | <0.01% |
| Aug 2026 | 33.4% | 22.4% | 12.7% | 13.2% | 4.5% | 3% | 3.7% | 2.5% | 2.5% | 1.3% | 0.6% | 0.26% | <0.01% |
| Sep 2026 | 34.4% | 23.1% | 13% | 11.1% | 4.6% | 3.8% | 3.1% | 2.5% | 2.1% | 1.4% | 0.62% | 0.22% | <0.01% |
How has the Missoma and Pandora comparison changed over the last 12 months?
3 findings
- Pandora was ahead of Missoma in every measured month of the 12 months ending September 2026.
- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, Missoma’s share of searches among jewellery brands worldwide moved from 0.57% to 0.62%, and its estimated monthly branded searches held steady at 74K.
- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, Pandora’s share of searches among jewellery brands worldwide moved from 12% to 13%, and its estimated monthly branded searches held steady at 1.6M.
How did search popularity change for jewellery brands worldwide in September 2026?
1 change

In September 2026, Pandora rose from 4th to 3rd among jewellery brands worldwide.
How are branded searches counted?
3 search terms
Brandwave collects information about searches that people make online using Missoma’s and Pandora’s names. When viewed over time, estimated search volumes for these branded terms can be used to understand whether interest in the brands is growing, holding steady, or fading.
Other head-to-heads among jewellery brands

Put your own brand in this comparison
Brandwave tracks your branded demand next to the rival you actually watch, with your campaigns, spend and outcomes on the same timeline.