Manhattan Active Transportation Management vs McLeod Software:Which is searched more?
In September 2026, McLeod Software had more branded searches than Manhattan Active Transportation Management among transportation management systems worldwide. McLeod Software had about 2,400 branded searches, while Manhattan Active Transportation Management had 70. McLeod Software made up 1.4% of all transportation management system searches we track, and Manhattan Active Transportation Management accounted for 0.04%. These are worldwide searches for English-language branded terms.
Follow Manhattan Active Transportation Management vs McLeod Software and get free monthly updates on what changed
By continuing you'll get index updates and occasional product news from Brandwave. Unsubscribe any time. Privacy
Is Manhattan Active Transportation Management or McLeod Software more popular in search?
Compare the systems freight teams plan loads in. Branded searches tell you how often people look for a brand by name or related terms. Comparing these searches across competitors helps you see how popular each brand is over time.
Share of searches by month for McLeod Software, Manhattan Active Transportation Management. The figures are in the table below the chart.
View monthly share of searches table
| Month | TMW | Turvo | Alpega | McLeod Software | Oracle Transportation Management | MercuryGate | Infios TMS | Manhattan Active Transportation Management |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 2025 | 75.1% | 18.4% | 2.4% | 1.3% | 1.3% | 1.3% | 0.05% | 0.04% |
| Nov 2025 | 71.5% | 21.5% | 2.9% | 1.2% | 1.6% | 1.2% | 0.06% | 0.03% |
| Dec 2025 | 75.2% | 18.5% | 2.5% | 1.3% | 1.3% | 1.1% | 0.03% | 0.03% |
| Jan 2026 | 86.2% | 9.5% | 1.9% | 0.84% | 0.84% | 0.67% | 0.02% | 0.02% |
| Feb 2026 | 79.1% | 13% | 3.2% | 1.4% | 2.1% | 1.1% | 0.05% | 0.03% |
| Mar 2026 | 73.1% | 18% | 3.6% | 1.6% | 2.4% | 1.3% | 0.07% | 0.05% |
| Apr 2026 | 73.5% | 18.1% | 3.6% | 1.6% | 1.9% | 1.1% | 0.09% | 0.05% |
| May 2026 | 77.7% | 15.6% | 2.5% | 1.1% | 2.1% | 0.92% | 0.05% | 0.03% |
| Jun 2026 | 80.8% | 13.3% | 2.2% | 1.2% | 1.8% | 0.78% | 0.04% | 0.02% |
| Jul 2026 | 83.4% | 11.2% | 1.8% | 1% | 1.8% | 0.66% | 0.03% | 0.02% |
| Aug 2026 | 86.9% | 9.6% | 1.3% | 0.67% | 1% | 0.46% | 0.03% | 0.01% |
| Sep 2026 | 78% | 15.7% | 2.5% | 1.4% | 1.4% | 0.92% | 0.04% | 0.04% |
How has the Manhattan Active Transportation Management and McLeod Software comparison changed over the last 12 months?
3 findings
- McLeod Software was ahead of Manhattan Active Transportation Management in every measured month of the 12 months ending September 2026.
- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, Manhattan Active Transportation Management’s share of searches among transportation management systems worldwide held steady at 0.04%, and its estimated monthly branded searches held steady at 70.
- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, McLeod Software’s share of searches among transportation management systems worldwide moved from 1.3% to 1.4%, and its estimated monthly branded searches held steady at 2.4K.
How did search popularity change for transportation management systems worldwide in September 2026?
1 change
In September 2026, McLeod Software overtook Oracle Transportation Management to rank 4th among transportation management systems worldwide, with 1.4% of the searches.
How are branded searches counted?
2 search terms
Brandwave collects information about searches that people make online using Manhattan Active Transportation Management’s and McLeod Software’s names. When viewed over time, estimated search volumes for these branded terms can be used to understand whether interest in the brands is growing, holding steady, or fading.
Manhattan Active Transportation Management
1 branded search term
- manhattan active transportation management
McLeod Software
1 branded search term
- mcleod software
Other head-to-heads among transportation management systems
Put your own brand in this comparison
Brandwave tracks your branded demand next to the rival you actually watch, with your campaigns, spend and outcomes on the same timeline.