Good Grants vs Submittable:Which is more popular?
In September 2026, Submittable had more branded searches than Good Grants among grant management software worldwide. Submittable had about 74,000 branded searches, while Good Grants had 1,000. Submittable made up 28.9% of all grant management software searches we track, and Good Grants accounted for 0.39%. When we asked ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews about grant management software, Submittable appeared in all five answers and Good Grants in two. Submittable was mentioned before Good Grants in every answer.
Who do people search for more?
Submittable, about 74 searches for every 1 for Good Grants
Who does AI mention more?
Submittable, mentioned in every answer we collected
Who does AI recommend more?
Submittable, named ahead of Good Grants in every answer
Follow Good Grants vs Submittable and get free monthly updates on what changed
By continuing you'll get index updates and occasional product news from Brandwave. Unsubscribe any time. Privacy
Top grant management software in ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews
In three ChatGPT questions and two Google AI Overviews, Submittable appeared in all five answers. Good Grants was mentioned in two out of five: not in any of the three ChatGPT answers, but in both Google AI Overviews. Submittable was listed before Good Grants in every answer.
Most recommended by AI
Brands get a higher ranking if they are mentioned earlier in the answers.
Instrumentl1st
Submittable2nd
Grantable3rd
Foundant4th
SmartSimple Cloud5th
Fluxx6th
Euna Grants7th
Good Grants8th
Blackbaud Grantmaking9th
AmpliFund10th
Mentioned by AI
Each dot is one answer, filled in when that answer mentions the brand.
Instrumentl5 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 2 of 2 Google answers
Submittable5 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 2 of 2 Google answers
Euna Grants3 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
Foundant2 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
SmartSimple Cloud2 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
Grantable2 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
Good Grants2 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 2 of 2 Google answers
Blackbaud Grantmaking2 of 5Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
Fluxx2 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
AmpliFund1 of 5Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
See every answer about grant management software
5 answers
Asked ChatGPT
“Which grant management software should I use?”
Asked ChatGPT
“What are the best grant management software options?”
Asked ChatGPT
“What's the best grant management software for funders and grants?”
Searched Google, AI Overview
“grant management software”
Searched Google, AI Overview
“grant tracking software”
Brands are shown in the order each answer named them. The survey took place in the United States on October 21, 2026.
Is Good Grants or Submittable more popular in search?
This chart shows how often people search Google for Good Grants and Submittable by name. Each line represents a brand's share of searches for all ten grant management software we track, month by month, from English-language searches worldwide.
Share of searches by month for Submittable, Good Grants. The figures are in the table below the chart.
View monthly share of searches table
| Month | Instrumentl | Submittable | Foundant | SmartSimple Cloud | Grantable | Euna Grants | Good Grants | AmpliFund | Blackbaud Grantmaking | Fluxx |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 2025 | 64.3% | 28.8% | 2.6% | 2.1% | 0.62% | 0.12% | 0.39% | 0.93% | 0.12% | 0.04% |
| Nov 2025 | 65.1% | 29.2% | 2.1% | 1.7% | 0.63% | 0.19% | 0.35% | 0.51% | 0.1% | 0.04% |
| Dec 2025 | 68.9% | 25.3% | 2.3% | 1.8% | 0.54% | 0.2% | 0.3% | 0.54% | 0.11% | 0.03% |
| Jan 2026 | 69.1% | 25.4% | 1.9% | 1.9% | 0.45% | 0.2% | 0.34% | 0.65% | 0.09% | 0.03% |
| Feb 2026 | 64.7% | 29% | 2.1% | 2.1% | 0.63% | 0.28% | 0.39% | 0.63% | 0.08% | 0.03% |
| Mar 2026 | 60.5% | 33.2% | 2.4% | 2% | 0.59% | 0.32% | 0.37% | 0.48% | 0.1% | 0.03% |
| Apr 2026 | 61% | 33.4% | 2% | 1.6% | 0.7% | 0.37% | 0.33% | 0.48% | 0.08% | 0.03% |
| May 2026 | 65.1% | 29.2% | 2.1% | 1.7% | 0.63% | 0.35% | 0.35% | 0.35% | 0.08% | 0.04% |
| Jun 2026 | 64.9% | 29.1% | 2.1% | 2.1% | 0.63% | 0.35% | 0.39% | 0.28% | 0.08% | 0.04% |
| Jul 2026 | 63.9% | 28.6% | 3.1% | 2.1% | 0.76% | 0.47% | 0.47% | 0.42% | 0.08% | 0.03% |
| Aug 2026 | 64.8% | 29.1% | 2.6% | 1.7% | 0.63% | 0.39% | 0.39% | 0.28% | 0.08% | 0.02% |
| Sep 2026 | 64.4% | 28.9% | 3.2% | 1.7% | 0.62% | 0.39% | 0.39% | 0.28% | 0.07% | 0.03% |
How has the Good Grants and Submittable comparison changed over the last 12 months?
3 findings
- Submittable was ahead of Good Grants in every measured month of the 12 months ending September 2026.
- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, Good Grants’ share of searches among grant management software worldwide held steady at 0.39%, and its estimated monthly branded searches held steady at 1K.
- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, Submittable’s share of searches among grant management software worldwide moved from 28.8% to 28.9%, and its estimated monthly branded searches held steady at 74K.
How did search popularity change for grant management software worldwide in September 2026?
0 changes
Neither Good Grants nor Submittable moved beyond provider rounding among grant management software in September 2026.
How are branded searches counted?
2 search terms
Brandwave collects information about searches that people make online using Good Grants’ and Submittable’s names. When viewed over time, estimated search volumes for these branded terms can be used to understand whether interest in the brands is growing, holding steady, or fading.
Good Grants
1 branded search term
- good grants
Submittable
1 branded search term
- submittable
Other head-to-heads among grant management software

Put your own brand in this comparison
Brandwave tracks your branded demand next to the rival you actually watch, with your campaigns, spend and outcomes on the same timeline.