FCM Travel vs SAP Concur:Which is more popular?
In September 2026, SAP Concur had more branded searches than FCM Travel among corporate travel management companies worldwide. SAP Concur had about 250,000 branded searches, while FCM Travel had 22,200. SAP Concur made up 31.5% of all corporate travel management company searches we track, and FCM Travel accounted for 2.8%. When we asked ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews about corporate travel management companies, SAP Concur appeared in three of the five answers and FCM Travel in two. FCM Travel and SAP Concur were each mentioned first in two of the four answers that named either.
Who do people search for more?
SAP Concur, about 11 searches for every 1 for FCM Travel
Who does AI mention more?
SAP Concur, mentioned in 3 of 5 answers, FCM Travel in 2
Who does AI recommend more?
Each is named first in 2 of 4 answers.
Follow FCM Travel vs SAP Concur and get free monthly updates on what changed
By continuing you'll get index updates and occasional product news from Brandwave. Unsubscribe any time. Privacy
Top corporate travel management companies in ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews
In three ChatGPT questions and two Google AI Overviews, SAP Concur was mentioned in three out of five: in two of the three ChatGPT answers and in one of the two Google AI Overviews. FCM Travel was mentioned in two out of five: in two of the three ChatGPT answers, but not in either of the two Google AI Overviews. FCM Travel and SAP Concur were each listed first in two of the four answers that named either.
Most recommended by AI
Brands get a higher ranking if they are mentioned earlier in the answers.
Mentioned by AI
Each dot is one answer, filled in when that answer mentions the brand.
BCD Travel5 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 2 of 2 Google answers
Navan4 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
Perk4 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
American Express Global Business Travel4 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
SAP Concur3 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
Corporate Traveler3 of 5Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 2 of 2 Google answers
FCM Travel2 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
ATPI0 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
See every answer about corporate travel management companies
5 answers
Asked ChatGPT
“Which corporate travel management company should I hire?”
Asked ChatGPT
“What are the best corporate travel management companies?”
Asked ChatGPT
“What's the best corporate travel management company for business trip bookings?”
Searched Google, AI Overview
“corporate travel management companies”
Searched Google, AI Overview
“business travel management”
Not named in any answer:
Brands are shown in the order each answer named them. The survey took place in the United States on October 20, 2026.
Is FCM Travel or SAP Concur more popular in search?
This chart shows how often people search Google for FCM Travel and SAP Concur by name. Each line represents a brand's share of searches for all eight corporate travel management companies we track, month by month, from English-language searches worldwide.
Share of searches by month for SAP Concur, FCM Travel. The figures are in the table below the chart.
View monthly share of searches table
| Month | Navan | SAP Concur | BCD Travel | Perk | FCM Travel | Corporate Traveler | American Express Global Business Travel | ATPI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 2025 | 44.8% | 29.1% | 5.7% | 12.8% | 2.6% | 2.1% | 1.4% | 1.4% |
| Nov 2025 | 40.1% | 31.8% | 7.7% | 11.8% | 2.8% | 2.8% | 1.5% | 1.5% |
| Dec 2025 | 38.4% | 37.1% | 9% | 7.7% | 2.7% | 2.2% | 1.5% | 1.5% |
| Jan 2026 | 46.6% | 30.2% | 7.3% | 7.8% | 2.7% | 2.2% | 1.8% | 1.5% |
| Feb 2026 | 41.5% | 32.8% | 7.9% | 8.4% | 2.9% | 2.9% | 1.9% | 1.6% |
| Mar 2026 | 43.1% | 33.9% | 8.1% | 7.1% | 2.4% | 2.4% | 1.6% | 1.3% |
| Apr 2026 | 43.7% | 34.3% | 6.8% | 7.2% | 2.5% | 2.5% | 1.7% | 1.4% |
| May 2026 | 47% | 30.3% | 7.3% | 6.4% | 2.7% | 2.7% | 2.2% | 1.5% |
| Jun 2026 | 44.2% | 34.8% | 8.4% | 5% | 2.5% | 2.1% | 1.7% | 1.4% |
| Jul 2026 | 48.3% | 31.3% | 7.6% | 4.6% | 2.8% | 2.8% | 1.5% | 1.2% |
| Aug 2026 | 53.1% | 28.4% | 6.9% | 4.2% | 2.5% | 2.5% | 1.4% | 1.1% |
| Sep 2026 | 48.6% | 31.5% | 7.6% | 4.6% | 2.8% | 2.3% | 1.5% | 1% |
How has the FCM Travel and SAP Concur comparison changed over the last 12 months?
3 findings
- SAP Concur was ahead of FCM Travel in every measured month of the 12 months ending September 2026.
- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, FCM Travel’s share of searches among corporate travel management companies worldwide moved from 2.6% to 2.8%, and its estimated monthly branded searches held steady at 22.2K.
- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, SAP Concur’s share of searches among corporate travel management companies worldwide moved from 29.1% to 31.5%, and its estimated monthly branded searches moved from 252K to 250K.
How did search popularity change for corporate travel management companies worldwide in September 2026?
2 changes

In September 2026, SAP Concur gained share of searches among corporate travel management companies worldwide, from 28.4% to 31.5%.

In September 2026, FCM Travel rose from 6th to 5th among corporate travel management companies worldwide.
How are branded searches counted?
7 search terms
Brandwave collects information about searches that people make online using FCM Travel’s and SAP Concur’s names. When viewed over time, estimated search volumes for these branded terms can be used to understand whether interest in the brands is growing, holding steady, or fading.
FCM Travel
1 branded search term
- fcm travel
SAP Concur
6 branded search terms
- concur app
- concur mobile app
- SAP Concur
- sap concur app
- sap concur expenseit
- sap concur software
Other head-to-heads among corporate travel management companies

Put your own brand in this comparison
Brandwave tracks your branded demand next to the rival you actually watch, with your campaigns, spend and outcomes on the same timeline.