e2open Global Trade Management vs Expeditors:Which is more popular?
In September 2026, Expeditors had more branded searches than e2open Global Trade Management among trade compliance platforms worldwide. Expeditors had about 90,500 branded searches, while e2open Global Trade Management had 50. Expeditors made up 17.8% of all trade compliance platform searches we track, and e2open Global Trade Management accounted for <0.01%. When we asked ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews about trade compliance platforms, e2open Global Trade Management appeared in three of the five answers and Expeditors in none.
Who do people search for more?
Expeditors, about 1810 searches for every 1 for e2open Global Trade Management
Who does AI mention more?
e2open Global Trade Management, mentioned in 3 of 5 answers, Expeditors in 0
Who does AI recommend more?
e2open Global Trade Management, the only one of the two named
Follow e2open Global Trade Management vs Expeditors and get free monthly updates on what changed
By continuing you'll get index updates and occasional product news from Brandwave. Unsubscribe any time. Privacy
Top trade compliance platforms in ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews
In three ChatGPT questions and two Google AI Overviews, e2open Global Trade Management was mentioned in three out of five: in all three ChatGPT answers, but not in either of the two Google AI Overviews. Expeditors did not appear in any of the five answers.
Most recommended by AI
Brands get a higher ranking if they are mentioned earlier in the answers.
Mentioned by AI
Each dot is one answer, filled in when that answer mentions the brand.
Thomson Reuters4 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers- Oracle Global Trade Management3 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
- e2open Global Trade Management3 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
Descartes MacroPoint3 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
Amber Road1 of 5Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
CargoWise1 of 5Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
Livingston0 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers- Expeditors0 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
See every answer about trade compliance platforms
5 answers
Asked ChatGPT
“Which trade compliance platform should I use?”
Asked ChatGPT
“What are the best trade compliance platforms?”
Asked ChatGPT
“What's the best trade compliance platform for cross border trade?”
Searched Google, AI Overview
“global trade compliance”
Searched Google, AI Overview
“customs compliance software”
Not named in any answer:
Brands are shown in the order each answer named them. The survey took place in the United States on October 21, 2026.
Is e2open Global Trade Management or Expeditors more popular in search?
This chart shows how often people search Google for e2open Global Trade Management and Expeditors by name. Each line represents a brand's share of searches for all eight trade compliance platforms we track, month by month, from English-language searches worldwide.
Share of searches by month for Expeditors, e2open Global Trade Management. The figures are in the table below the chart.
View monthly share of searches table
| Month | Livingston | Thomson Reuters | Expeditors | Amber Road | CargoWise | Oracle Global Trade Management | e2open Global Trade Management | Descartes MacroPoint |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 2025 | 44.7% | 30% | 16.4% | 6% | 2.7% | 0.13% | <0.01% | <0.01% |
| Nov 2025 | 44.9% | 30.2% | 16.5% | 5% | 3.3% | 0.13% | <0.01% | <0.01% |
| Dec 2025 | 44.4% | 29.8% | 16.4% | 6% | 3.3% | 0.09% | <0.01% | <0.01% |
| Jan 2026 | 39.8% | 32.7% | 17.9% | 6.6% | 2.9% | 0.1% | <0.01% | <0.01% |
| Feb 2026 | 40.3% | 33.1% | 18.1% | 5.4% | 3% | 0.14% | <0.01% | <0.01% |
| Mar 2026 | 40% | 32.8% | 18% | 5.4% | 3.6% | 0.18% | <0.01% | <0.01% |
| Apr 2026 | 44.1% | 29.6% | 16.2% | 7.3% | 2.7% | 0.11% | <0.01% | <0.01% |
| May 2026 | 47.3% | 26% | 17.4% | 6.4% | 2.8% | 0.11% | <0.01% | <0.01% |
| Jun 2026 | 48.7% | 26.7% | 17.9% | 3.6% | 2.9% | 0.12% | <0.01% | <0.01% |
| Jul 2026 | 53.8% | 24.1% | 16.2% | 3.2% | 2.6% | 0.09% | <0.01% | <0.01% |
| Aug 2026 | 48.7% | 26.7% | 17.9% | 2.9% | 3.6% | 0.1% | <0.01% | <0.01% |
| Sep 2026 | 48.4% | 26.6% | 17.8% | 3.6% | 3.6% | 0.09% | <0.01% | <0.01% |
How has the e2open Global Trade Management and Expeditors comparison changed over the last 12 months?
3 findings
- Expeditors was ahead of e2open Global Trade Management in every measured month of the 12 months ending September 2026.
- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, e2open Global Trade Management’s share of searches among trade compliance platforms worldwide held steady at <0.01%, and its estimated monthly branded searches moved from 20 to 50.
- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, Expeditors’ share of searches among trade compliance platforms worldwide moved from 16.4% to 17.8%, and its estimated monthly branded searches held steady at 90.5K.
How did search popularity change for trade compliance platforms worldwide in September 2026?
1 change
Estimated monthly branded searches for e2open Global Trade Management worldwide rose 150% over 12 measured months, from 20 to 50 in September 2026.
How are branded searches counted?
2 search terms
Brandwave collects information about searches that people make online using e2open Global Trade Management’s and Expeditors’ names. When viewed over time, estimated search volumes for these branded terms can be used to understand whether interest in the brands is growing, holding steady, or fading.
e2open Global Trade Management
1 branded search term
- e2open global trade management
Expeditors
1 branded search term
- expeditors
Other head-to-heads among trade compliance platforms
Put your own brand in this comparison
Brandwave tracks your branded demand next to the rival you actually watch, with your campaigns, spend and outcomes on the same timeline.