DuckDB vs StarRocks:Which is more popular?
In September 2026, DuckDB had more branded searches than StarRocks among OLAP database platforms worldwide. DuckDB had about 110,000 branded searches, while StarRocks had 8,100. DuckDB made up 25.3% of all OLAP database platform searches we track, and StarRocks accounted for 1.9%. When we asked ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews about OLAP database platforms, DuckDB appeared in four of the five answers and StarRocks in one. DuckDB was mentioned before StarRocks in three out of four answers that named either.
Who do people search for more?
DuckDB, about 14 searches for every 1 for StarRocks
Who does AI mention more?
DuckDB, mentioned in 4 of 5 answers, StarRocks in 1
Who does AI recommend more?
DuckDB, named ahead of StarRocks in 3 of 4 answers
Follow DuckDB vs StarRocks and get free monthly updates on what changed
By continuing you'll get index updates and occasional product news from Brandwave. Unsubscribe any time. Privacy
Top OLAP database platforms in ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews
In three ChatGPT questions and two Google AI Overviews, DuckDB was mentioned in four out of five: in all three ChatGPT answers and in one of the two Google AI Overviews. StarRocks was mentioned in one out of five: in one of the three ChatGPT answers, but not in either of the two Google AI Overviews. DuckDB was listed before StarRocks in three out of four answers that named either.
Most recommended by AI
Brands get a higher ranking if they are mentioned earlier in the answers.
ClickHouse1st
Snowflake2nd
BigQuery3rd
DuckDB4th
Amazon Redshift5th
Apache Pinot6th
StarRocks7th
Apache Doris8th
Apache Druid9th- Vertica–
Mentioned by AI
Each dot is one answer, filled in when that answer mentions the brand.
BigQuery5 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 2 of 2 Google answers
ClickHouse5 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 2 of 2 Google answers
Snowflake5 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 2 of 2 Google answers
DuckDB4 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
Amazon Redshift4 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 2 of 2 Google answers
Apache Doris2 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
Apache Druid2 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
Apache Pinot2 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
StarRocks1 of 5Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers- Vertica0 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
See every answer about OLAP database platforms
5 answers
Asked ChatGPT
“Which OLAP database should I use?”
Asked ChatGPT
“What are the best OLAP databases?”
Asked ChatGPT
“What's the best OLAP database for analytical queries?”
Searched Google, AI Overview
“analytics database”
Searched Google, AI Overview
“columnar database”
Not named in any answer:
Brands are shown in the order each answer named them. The survey took place in the United States on October 21, 2026.
Is DuckDB or StarRocks more popular in search?
This chart shows how often people search Google for DuckDB and StarRocks by name. Each line represents a brand's share of searches for all ten OLAP database platforms we track, month by month, from English-language searches worldwide.
Share of searches by month for DuckDB, StarRocks. The figures are in the table below the chart.
View monthly share of searches table
| Month | BigQuery | ClickHouse | DuckDB | Amazon Redshift | Vertica | Snowflake | StarRocks | Apache Doris | Apache Druid | Apache Pinot |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 2025 | 31.2% | 25.4% | 17.1% | 12.8% | 4.2% | 3.4% | 2.3% | 1.2% | 1.2% | 1% |
| Nov 2025 | 32.3% | 26.3% | 17.7% | 10.8% | 4.3% | 2.9% | 2.4% | 1.1% | 1.1% | 1.1% |
| Dec 2025 | 30.2% | 24.9% | 20.3% | 10.2% | 5% | 3.3% | 2.7% | 1.2% | 1.2% | 0.99% |
| Jan 2026 | 30.5% | 30.5% | 16.7% | 9.7% | 4.1% | 3.3% | 2.2% | 1% | 1% | 0.81% |
| Feb 2026 | 32.7% | 26.7% | 17.9% | 10.4% | 4.4% | 2.9% | 2% | 1.1% | 1.1% | 0.87% |
| Mar 2026 | 31.2% | 25.4% | 20.9% | 10.5% | 4.2% | 2.8% | 2.3% | 1% | 0.83% | 0.83% |
| Apr 2026 | 31.4% | 25.6% | 21.1% | 10% | 4.2% | 2.8% | 2.3% | 1% | 0.84% | 0.68% |
| May 2026 | 32.2% | 26.2% | 21.6% | 8.8% | 4.3% | 2.4% | 1.9% | 1% | 0.86% | 0.69% |
| Jun 2026 | 32.2% | 26.3% | 21.6% | 8.4% | 4.3% | 2.4% | 2.4% | 1.1% | 0.69% | 0.69% |
| Jul 2026 | 32.6% | 26.6% | 21.9% | 8.5% | 3.6% | 2.4% | 2% | 1.1% | 0.7% | 0.7% |
| Aug 2026 | 25.5% | 31.2% | 25.5% | 8.1% | 3.4% | 2.3% | 1.9% | 1% | 0.56% | 0.56% |
| Sep 2026 | 31% | 25.3% | 25.3% | 8.1% | 4.2% | 2.3% | 1.9% | 1% | 0.55% | 0.55% |
How has the DuckDB and StarRocks comparison changed over the last 12 months?
3 findings
- DuckDB was ahead of StarRocks in every measured month of the 12 months ending September 2026.
- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, DuckDB’s share of searches among OLAP database platforms worldwide moved from 17.1% to 25.3%, and its estimated monthly branded searches moved from 74K to 110K.
- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, StarRocks’ share of searches among OLAP database platforms worldwide moved from 2.3% to 1.9%, and its estimated monthly branded searches moved from 9.9K to 8.1K.
How did search popularity change for OLAP database platforms worldwide in September 2026?
2 changes

StarRocks’ share of searches among OLAP database platforms worldwide has lost ground for 3 months in a row, from 2.4% to 1.9% in September 2026.

Estimated monthly branded searches for DuckDB worldwide rose 48.6% over 12 measured months, from 74K to 110K in September 2026.
How are branded searches counted?
2 search terms
Brandwave collects information about searches that people make online using DuckDB’s and StarRocks’ names. When viewed over time, estimated search volumes for these branded terms can be used to understand whether interest in the brands is growing, holding steady, or fading.
Other head-to-heads among OLAP database platforms

Put your own brand in this comparison
Brandwave tracks your branded demand next to the rival you actually watch, with your campaigns, spend and outcomes on the same timeline.