Datawrapper vs Metabase:Which is more popular?
In September 2026, Metabase had more branded searches than Datawrapper among data visualisation platforms worldwide. Metabase had about 110,000 branded searches, while Datawrapper had 49,500. Metabase made up 2.5% of all data visualisation platform searches we track, and Datawrapper accounted for 1.1%. When we asked ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews about data visualisation platforms, Datawrapper and Metabase each appeared in two of the five answers. Datawrapper and Metabase were each mentioned first in two of the four answers that named either.
Who do people search for more?
Metabase, about 2 searches for every 1 for Datawrapper
Who does AI mention more?
Both were mentioned in 2 of 5 answers.
Who does AI recommend more?
Each is named first in 2 of 4 answers.
Follow Datawrapper vs Metabase and get free monthly updates on what changed
By continuing you'll get index updates and occasional product news from Brandwave. Unsubscribe any time. Privacy
Top data visualisation platforms in ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews
In three ChatGPT questions and two Google AI Overviews, Datawrapper was mentioned in two out of five: not in any of the three ChatGPT answers, but in both Google AI Overviews. Metabase was mentioned in two out of five: in two of the three ChatGPT answers, but not in either of the two Google AI Overviews. Datawrapper and Metabase were each listed first in two of the four answers that named either.
Most recommended by AI
Brands get a higher ranking if they are mentioned earlier in the answers.
Microsoft Power BI1st
Tableau2nd
Looker Studio3rd
Qlik4th
Plotly5th
Domo6th
Flourish7th
Datawrapper8th
Grafana9th
Metabase10th
Mentioned by AI
Each dot is one answer, filled in when that answer mentions the brand.
Microsoft Power BI5 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 2 of 2 Google answers
Tableau5 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 2 of 2 Google answers
Looker Studio5 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 2 of 2 Google answers
Plotly4 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 2 of 2 Google answers
Qlik3 of 5Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 2 of 2 Google answers
Grafana3 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
Metabase2 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
Datawrapper2 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 2 of 2 Google answers
Flourish2 of 5Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
Domo1 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
See every answer about data visualisation platforms
5 answers
Asked ChatGPT
“Which data visualisation platform should I use?”
Asked ChatGPT
“What are the best data visualisation platforms?”
Asked ChatGPT
“What's the best data visualisation platform for dashboards?”
Searched Google, AI Overview
“data visualisation platforms”
Searched Google, AI Overview
“data visualization software”
Brands are shown in the order each answer named them. The survey took place in the United States on October 20, 2026.
Is Datawrapper or Metabase more popular in search?
This chart shows how often people search Google for Datawrapper and Metabase by name. Each line represents a brand's share of searches for all ten data visualisation platforms we track, month by month, from English-language searches worldwide.
Share of searches by month for Metabase, Datawrapper. The figures are in the table below the chart.
View monthly share of searches table
| Month | Microsoft Power BI | Tableau | Looker Studio | Domo | Qlik | Metabase | Datawrapper | Plotly | Flourish | Grafana |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 2025 | 55% | 15.1% | 12.9% | 8.2% | 3.8% | 2% | 1.3% | 1.3% | 0.27% | <0.01% |
| Nov 2025 | 59.6% | 13.3% | 11.5% | 7.2% | 3.5% | 2.1% | 1.4% | 1.2% | 0.24% | <0.01% |
| Dec 2025 | 55.6% | 12.5% | 13% | 10.1% | 3.6% | 2.5% | 1.4% | 1.1% | 0.27% | <0.01% |
| Jan 2026 | 58.6% | 13.1% | 11.5% | 8.6% | 3.4% | 2.1% | 1.2% | 1.2% | 0.28% | <0.01% |
| Feb 2026 | 59.7% | 13.4% | 11.8% | 7.2% | 3.4% | 2.2% | 1.2% | 0.97% | 0.19% | <0.01% |
| Mar 2026 | 58.5% | 13% | 11.4% | 8.5% | 3.3% | 2.6% | 1.4% | 1.1% | 0.19% | <0.01% |
| Apr 2026 | 58.9% | 13.1% | 11.3% | 8.6% | 3.3% | 2.1% | 1.4% | 1.2% | 0.19% | <0.01% |
| May 2026 | 61.3% | 10.9% | 11.4% | 8.8% | 3.2% | 2.1% | 1.2% | 0.97% | 0.19% | <0.01% |
| Jun 2026 | 57.8% | 12% | 12.5% | 9.7% | 3.4% | 2.4% | 1.1% | 1.1% | 0.17% | <0.01% |
| Jul 2026 | 60% | 12.1% | 12.5% | 8% | 3.1% | 2.4% | 0.88% | 0.88% | 0.21% | <0.01% |
| Aug 2026 | 60.3% | 12.1% | 10.4% | 9.8% | 3.1% | 2.4% | 0.88% | 0.88% | 0.18% | <0.01% |
| Sep 2026 | 58% | 12.6% | 10.8% | 10.2% | 3.8% | 2.5% | 1.1% | 0.75% | 0.15% | <0.01% |
How has the Datawrapper and Metabase comparison changed over the last 12 months?
3 findings
- Metabase was ahead of Datawrapper in every measured month of the 12 months ending September 2026.
- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, Datawrapper’s share of searches among data visualisation platforms worldwide moved from 1.3% to 1.1%, and its estimated monthly branded searches moved from 74K to 49.5K.
- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, Metabase’s share of searches among data visualisation platforms worldwide moved from 2% to 2.5%, and its estimated monthly branded searches held steady at 110K.
How did search popularity change for data visualisation platforms worldwide in September 2026?
1 change

Estimated monthly branded searches for Datawrapper worldwide fell 33.1% over 12 measured months, from 74K to 49.5K in September 2026.
How are branded searches counted?
2 search terms
Brandwave collects information about searches that people make online using Datawrapper’s and Metabase’s names. When viewed over time, estimated search volumes for these branded terms can be used to understand whether interest in the brands is growing, holding steady, or fading.
Datawrapper
1 branded search term
- datawrapper
Metabase
1 branded search term
- metabase
Other head-to-heads among data visualisation platforms

Put your own brand in this comparison
Brandwave tracks your branded demand next to the rival you actually watch, with your campaigns, spend and outcomes on the same timeline.