Blissy vs Mulberry Park Silks:Which is more popular?
In September 2026, Blissy had more branded searches than Mulberry Park Silks among silk pillowcase brands worldwide. Blissy had about 45,200 branded searches, while Mulberry Park Silks had 1,000. Blissy made up 69.2% of all silk pillowcase brand searches we track, and Mulberry Park Silks accounted for 1.5%. When we asked ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews about silk pillowcase brands, Blissy appeared in all five answers and Mulberry Park Silks in one. Blissy was mentioned before Mulberry Park Silks in every answer.
Who do people search for more?
Blissy, about 45 searches for every 1 for Mulberry Park Silks
Who does AI mention more?
Blissy, mentioned in every answer we collected
Who does AI recommend more?
Blissy, named ahead of Mulberry Park Silks in every answer
Follow Blissy vs Mulberry Park Silks and get free monthly updates on what changed
By continuing you'll get index updates and occasional product news from Brandwave. Unsubscribe any time. Privacy
Top silk pillowcase brands in ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews
In three ChatGPT questions and two Google AI Overviews, Blissy appeared in all five answers. Mulberry Park Silks was mentioned in one out of five: in one of the three ChatGPT answers, but not in either of the two Google AI Overviews. Blissy was listed before Mulberry Park Silks in every answer.
Most recommended by AI
Brands get a higher ranking if they are mentioned earlier in the answers.
Fishers Finery1st
Quince2nd
Slip3rd- Blissy4th
Brooklinen5th
LilySilk6th
Mulberry Park Silks7th
Kitsch–
ZimaSilk–- Alaska Bear–
Mentioned by AI
Each dot is one answer, filled in when that answer mentions the brand.
- Blissy5 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 2 of 2 Google answers
- Fishers Finery5 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 2 of 2 Google answers
- Slip4 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 2 of 2 Google answers
- Quince4 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 2 of 2 Google answers
- Mulberry Park Silks1 of 5Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
- LilySilk1 of 5Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
- Brooklinen1 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
- Kitsch0 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
- ZimaSilk0 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
- Alaska Bear0 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
See every answer about silk pillowcase brands
5 answers
Asked ChatGPT
“Which silk pillowcase brand should I buy?”
Asked ChatGPT
“What are the best silk pillowcase brands?”
Asked ChatGPT
“What's the best silk pillowcase brand for hair and skin?”
Searched Google, AI Overview
“silk pillowcase”
Searched Google, AI Overview
“best silk pillowcase”
Not named in any answer:
Brands are shown in the order each answer named them. The survey took place in the United States on October 22, 2026.
Is Blissy or Mulberry Park Silks more popular in search?
This chart shows how often people search Google for Blissy and Mulberry Park Silks by name. Each line represents a brand's share of searches for all ten silk pillowcase brands we track, month by month, from English-language searches worldwide.
Share of searches by month for Blissy, Mulberry Park Silks. The figures are in the table below the chart.
View monthly share of searches table
| Month | Blissy | Slip | Kitsch | Fishers Finery | Quince | Mulberry Park Silks | LilySilk | ZimaSilk | Brooklinen | Alaska Bear |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 2025 | 77.6% | 8.5% | 3.7% | 3.1% | 2.1% | 1.3% | 1.3% | 1.3% | 0.76% | 0.34% |
| Nov 2025 | 75% | 9.2% | 5% | 3.3% | 3.3% | 0.99% | 0.99% | 0.81% | 1.2% | 0.2% |
| Dec 2025 | 71.7% | 9.6% | 6.4% | 4.3% | 2.3% | 1.3% | 1.9% | 0.85% | 1.3% | 0.26% |
| Jan 2026 | 66.7% | 13.4% | 4.9% | 4% | 4.9% | 1.8% | 1.4% | 1.4% | 1.1% | 0.35% |
| Feb 2026 | 58.3% | 23.3% | 5.7% | 3.1% | 3.1% | 1.3% | 1.1% | 1.3% | 2.5% | 0.34% |
| Mar 2026 | 67.8% | 13.1% | 5.8% | 3.8% | 3.2% | 2.1% | 1.2% | 1.7% | 0.78% | 0.42% |
| Apr 2026 | 64.6% | 15.3% | 6.8% | 3.7% | 3.7% | 2% | 1.4% | 1.5% | 0.74% | 0.32% |
| May 2026 | 58.9% | 13.9% | 13.9% | 3.4% | 4.1% | 1.8% | 1.4% | 1.4% | 0.83% | 0.37% |
| Jun 2026 | 55.3% | 12.1% | 18.1% | 3.6% | 5.4% | 1.5% | 1.3% | 1.5% | 0.88% | 0.39% |
| Jul 2026 | 49.7% | 11.7% | 21.5% | 2.8% | 9.6% | 1.2% | 1% | 1.2% | 0.85% | 0.31% |
| Aug 2026 | 58.5% | 8.5% | 15.7% | 3.8% | 8.5% | 1.7% | 1.1% | 1.3% | 0.62% | 0.27% |
| Sep 2026 | 69.2% | 10.1% | 8.3% | 3.7% | 3.7% | 1.5% | 1.3% | 1.3% | 0.6% | 0.26% |
How has the Blissy and Mulberry Park Silks comparison changed over the last 12 months?
3 findings
- Blissy was ahead of Mulberry Park Silks in every measured month of the 12 months ending September 2026.
- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, Blissy’s share of searches among silk pillowcase brands worldwide moved from 77.6% to 69.2%, and its estimated monthly branded searches moved from 60.2K to 45.2K.
- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, Mulberry Park Silks’ share of searches among silk pillowcase brands worldwide moved from 1.3% to 1.5%, and its estimated monthly branded searches held steady at 1K.
How did search popularity change for silk pillowcase brands worldwide in September 2026?
1 change
In September 2026, Blissy gained share of searches among silk pillowcase brands worldwide, from 58.5% to 69.2%.
How are branded searches counted?
3 search terms
Brandwave collects information about searches that people make online using Blissy’s and Mulberry Park Silks’ names. When viewed over time, estimated search volumes for these branded terms can be used to understand whether interest in the brands is growing, holding steady, or fading.
Blissy
2 branded search terms
- blissy
- blissy pillowcase
Mulberry Park Silks
1 branded search term
- mulberry park silks
Other head-to-heads among silk pillowcase brands
Put your own brand in this comparison
Brandwave tracks your branded demand next to the rival you actually watch, with your campaigns, spend and outcomes on the same timeline.