Apache Pinot vs DuckDB:Which is more popular?
In September 2026, DuckDB had more branded searches than Apache Pinot among OLAP database platforms worldwide. DuckDB had about 110,000 branded searches, while Apache Pinot had 2,400. DuckDB made up 25.3% of all OLAP database platform searches we track, and Apache Pinot accounted for 0.55%. When we asked ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews about OLAP database platforms, DuckDB appeared in four of the five answers and Apache Pinot in two. DuckDB was mentioned before Apache Pinot in every answer that named either.
Who do people search for more?
DuckDB, about 46 searches for every 1 for Apache Pinot
Who does AI mention more?
DuckDB, mentioned in 4 of 5 answers, Apache Pinot in 2
Who does AI recommend more?
DuckDB, named ahead of Apache Pinot in 4 of 4 answers
Follow Apache Pinot vs DuckDB and get free monthly updates on what changed
By continuing you'll get index updates and occasional product news from Brandwave. Unsubscribe any time. Privacy
Top OLAP database platforms in ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews
In three ChatGPT questions and two Google AI Overviews, DuckDB was mentioned in four out of five: in all three ChatGPT answers and in one of the two Google AI Overviews. Apache Pinot was mentioned in two out of five: in two of the three ChatGPT answers, but not in either of the two Google AI Overviews. DuckDB was listed before Apache Pinot in every answer that named either.
Most recommended by AI
Brands get a higher ranking if they are mentioned earlier in the answers.
ClickHouse1st
Snowflake2nd
BigQuery3rd
DuckDB4th
Amazon Redshift5th
Apache Pinot6th
StarRocks7th
Apache Doris8th
Apache Druid9th- Vertica–
Mentioned by AI
Each dot is one answer, filled in when that answer mentions the brand.
BigQuery5 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 2 of 2 Google answers
ClickHouse5 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 2 of 2 Google answers
Snowflake5 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 2 of 2 Google answers
DuckDB4 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
Amazon Redshift4 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 2 of 2 Google answers
Apache Doris2 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
Apache Druid2 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
Apache Pinot2 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
StarRocks1 of 5Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers- Vertica0 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
See every answer about OLAP database platforms
5 answers
Asked ChatGPT
“Which OLAP database should I use?”
Asked ChatGPT
“What are the best OLAP databases?”
Asked ChatGPT
“What's the best OLAP database for analytical queries?”
Searched Google, AI Overview
“analytics database”
Searched Google, AI Overview
“columnar database”
Not named in any answer:
Brands are shown in the order each answer named them. The survey took place in the United States on October 21, 2026.
Is Apache Pinot or DuckDB more popular in search?
This chart shows how often people search Google for Apache Pinot and DuckDB by name. Each line represents a brand's share of searches for all ten OLAP database platforms we track, month by month, from English-language searches worldwide.
Share of searches by month for DuckDB, Apache Pinot. The figures are in the table below the chart.
View monthly share of searches table
| Month | BigQuery | ClickHouse | DuckDB | Amazon Redshift | Vertica | Snowflake | StarRocks | Apache Doris | Apache Druid | Apache Pinot |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 2025 | 31.2% | 25.4% | 17.1% | 12.8% | 4.2% | 3.4% | 2.3% | 1.2% | 1.2% | 1% |
| Nov 2025 | 32.3% | 26.3% | 17.7% | 10.8% | 4.3% | 2.9% | 2.4% | 1.1% | 1.1% | 1.1% |
| Dec 2025 | 30.2% | 24.9% | 20.3% | 10.2% | 5% | 3.3% | 2.7% | 1.2% | 1.2% | 0.99% |
| Jan 2026 | 30.5% | 30.5% | 16.7% | 9.7% | 4.1% | 3.3% | 2.2% | 1% | 1% | 0.81% |
| Feb 2026 | 32.7% | 26.7% | 17.9% | 10.4% | 4.4% | 2.9% | 2% | 1.1% | 1.1% | 0.87% |
| Mar 2026 | 31.2% | 25.4% | 20.9% | 10.5% | 4.2% | 2.8% | 2.3% | 1% | 0.83% | 0.83% |
| Apr 2026 | 31.4% | 25.6% | 21.1% | 10% | 4.2% | 2.8% | 2.3% | 1% | 0.84% | 0.68% |
| May 2026 | 32.2% | 26.2% | 21.6% | 8.8% | 4.3% | 2.4% | 1.9% | 1% | 0.86% | 0.69% |
| Jun 2026 | 32.2% | 26.3% | 21.6% | 8.4% | 4.3% | 2.4% | 2.4% | 1.1% | 0.69% | 0.69% |
| Jul 2026 | 32.6% | 26.6% | 21.9% | 8.5% | 3.6% | 2.4% | 2% | 1.1% | 0.7% | 0.7% |
| Aug 2026 | 25.5% | 31.2% | 25.5% | 8.1% | 3.4% | 2.3% | 1.9% | 1% | 0.56% | 0.56% |
| Sep 2026 | 31% | 25.3% | 25.3% | 8.1% | 4.2% | 2.3% | 1.9% | 1% | 0.55% | 0.55% |
How has the Apache Pinot and DuckDB comparison changed over the last 12 months?
3 findings
- DuckDB was ahead of Apache Pinot in every measured month of the 12 months ending September 2026.
- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, Apache Pinot’s share of searches among OLAP database platforms worldwide moved from 1% to 0.55%, and its estimated monthly branded searches moved from 4.4K to 2.4K.
- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, DuckDB’s share of searches among OLAP database platforms worldwide moved from 17.1% to 25.3%, and its estimated monthly branded searches moved from 74K to 110K.
How did search popularity change for OLAP database platforms worldwide in September 2026?
2 changes

Estimated monthly branded searches for DuckDB worldwide rose 48.6% over 12 measured months, from 74K to 110K in September 2026.

Estimated monthly branded searches for Apache Pinot worldwide fell 45.5% over 12 measured months, from 4.4K to 2.4K in September 2026.
How are branded searches counted?
2 search terms
Brandwave collects information about searches that people make online using Apache Pinot’s and DuckDB’s names. When viewed over time, estimated search volumes for these branded terms can be used to understand whether interest in the brands is growing, holding steady, or fading.
Apache Pinot
1 branded search term
- apache pinot
DuckDB
1 branded search term
- duckdb
Other head-to-heads among OLAP database platforms

Put your own brand in this comparison
Brandwave tracks your branded demand next to the rival you actually watch, with your campaigns, spend and outcomes on the same timeline.