Firecrawl vs Oxylabs:Which is more popular?
In September 2026, Firecrawl had more branded searches than Oxylabs among web scraping APIs worldwide. Firecrawl had about 135,000 branded searches, while Oxylabs had 33,100. Firecrawl made up 23.5% of all web scraping API searches we track, and Oxylabs accounted for 5.8%. When we asked ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews about web scraping APIs, Firecrawl appeared in three of the five answers and Oxylabs in two. Firecrawl was mentioned before Oxylabs in three out of four answers that named either.
Who do people search for more?
Firecrawl, about 4 searches for every 1 for Oxylabs
Who does AI mention more?
Firecrawl, mentioned in 3 of 5 answers, Oxylabs in 2
Who does AI recommend more?
Firecrawl, named ahead of Oxylabs in 3 of 4 answers
Follow Firecrawl vs Oxylabs and get free monthly updates on what changed
By continuing you'll get index updates and occasional product news from Brandwave. Unsubscribe any time. Privacy
Top web scraping APIs in ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews
In three ChatGPT questions and two Google AI Overviews, Firecrawl was mentioned in three out of five: in two of the three ChatGPT answers and in one of the two Google AI Overviews. Oxylabs was mentioned in two out of five: in one of the three ChatGPT answers and in one of the two Google AI Overviews. Firecrawl was listed before Oxylabs in three out of four answers that named either.
Most recommended by AI
Brands get a higher ranking if they are mentioned earlier in the answers.
Bright Data1st
Zyte2nd- Firecrawl3rd
ScrapingBee4th
Apify5th
ScrapeGraphAI6th
Oxylabs7th- ZenRows8th
ScraperAPI9th
Mentioned by AI
Each dot is one answer, filled in when that answer mentions the brand.
- ScrapingBee5 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 2 of 2 Google answers
- Zyte5 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 2 of 2 Google answers
- Bright Data5 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 2 of 2 Google answers
- Apify4 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
- Firecrawl3 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
- Oxylabs2 of 5Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
- ScrapeGraphAI2 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 2 of 2 Google answers
- ScraperAPI2 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 2 of 2 Google answers
- ZenRows2 of 5Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
See every answer about web scraping APIs
5 answers
Asked ChatGPT
“Which web scraping API should I use?”
Asked ChatGPT
“What are the best web scraping APIs?”
Asked ChatGPT
“What's the best web scraping API for data at scale?”
Searched Google, AI Overview
“web scraping apis”
Searched Google, AI Overview
“website scraping api”
Brands are shown in the order each answer named them. The survey took place in the United States on October 21, 2026.
Is Firecrawl or Oxylabs more popular in search?
This chart shows how often people search Google for Firecrawl and Oxylabs by name. Each line represents a brand's share of searches for all nine web scraping APIs we track, month by month, from English-language searches worldwide.
Share of searches by month for Firecrawl, Oxylabs. The figures are in the table below the chart.
View monthly share of searches table
| Month | Apify | Firecrawl | Oxylabs | ScrapeGraphAI | ScrapingBee | Zyte | ScraperAPI | ZenRows | Bright Data |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 2025 | 50.8% | 22.8% | 15.2% | 1.1% | 3% | 2% | 3% | 2% | <0.01% |
| Nov 2025 | 54.2% | 19.9% | 13.3% | 1.2% | 2.7% | 2.7% | 4% | 2.2% | <0.01% |
| Dec 2025 | 52.6% | 23.6% | 12.9% | 0.92% | 2.6% | 2.1% | 3.2% | 2.1% | <0.01% |
| Jan 2026 | 50.4% | 27.6% | 12.4% | 0.9% | 2.5% | 1.7% | 2.5% | 2% | <0.01% |
| Feb 2026 | 55.6% | 24.9% | 11.2% | 0.81% | 2.2% | 1.5% | 2.2% | 1.5% | <0.01% |
| Mar 2026 | 57.8% | 25.9% | 9.5% | 0.57% | 1.6% | 1.3% | 2.3% | 1% | <0.01% |
| Apr 2026 | 54.7% | 29.9% | 9% | 0.54% | 1.5% | 1.2% | 2.2% | 0.98% | <0.01% |
| May 2026 | 58.6% | 26.3% | 7.9% | 1.6% | 1.6% | 1.1% | 1.9% | 1.1% | <0.01% |
| Jun 2026 | 59% | 26.5% | 7.9% | 1.6% | 1.3% | 1.1% | 1.6% | 1.1% | <0.01% |
| Jul 2026 | 61.5% | 22.5% | 10.1% | 0.9% | 1.4% | 1.1% | 1.7% | 0.9% | <0.01% |
| Aug 2026 | 60.4% | 27% | 6.6% | 1.3% | 1.3% | 1.3% | 1.1% | 0.89% | <0.01% |
| Sep 2026 | 64.2% | 23.5% | 5.8% | 1.7% | 1.7% | 1.2% | 0.94% | 0.94% | <0.01% |
How has the Firecrawl and Oxylabs comparison changed over the last 12 months?
3 findings
- Firecrawl was ahead of Oxylabs in every measured month of the 12 months ending September 2026.
- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, Firecrawl’s share of searches among web scraping APIs worldwide moved from 22.8% to 23.5%, and its estimated monthly branded searches moved from 74K to 135K.
- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, Oxylabs’ share of searches among web scraping APIs worldwide moved from 15.2% to 5.8%, and its estimated monthly branded searches moved from 49.5K to 33.1K.
How did search popularity change for web scraping APIs worldwide in September 2026?
2 changes
In September 2026, Firecrawl lost share of searches among web scraping APIs worldwide, from 27% to 23.5%.
In September 2026, Oxylabs lost share of searches among web scraping APIs worldwide, from 6.6% to 5.8%.
How are branded searches counted?
2 search terms
Brandwave collects information about searches that people make online using Firecrawl’s and Oxylabs’ names. When viewed over time, estimated search volumes for these branded terms can be used to understand whether interest in the brands is growing, holding steady, or fading.
Other head-to-heads among web scraping APIs
Put your own brand in this comparison
Brandwave tracks your branded demand next to the rival you actually watch, with your campaigns, spend and outcomes on the same timeline.