Anomali vs Mandiant:Which is more popular?
In September 2026, Anomali had more branded searches than Mandiant among threat intelligence platforms worldwide. Anomali had about 90,500 branded searches, while Mandiant had 18,100. Anomali made up 30.3% of all threat intelligence platform searches we track, and Mandiant accounted for 6.1%. When we asked ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews about threat intelligence platforms, Mandiant appeared in all five answers and Anomali in two. Mandiant was mentioned before Anomali in three out of five answers.
Who do people search for more?
Anomali, about 5 searches for every 1 for Mandiant
Who does AI mention more?
Mandiant, mentioned in every answer we collected
Who does AI recommend more?
Mandiant, named ahead of Anomali in 3 of 5 answers
Follow Anomali vs Mandiant and get free monthly updates on what changed
By continuing you'll get index updates and occasional product news from Brandwave. Unsubscribe any time. Privacy
Top threat intelligence platforms in ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews
In three ChatGPT questions and two Google AI Overviews, Mandiant appeared in all five answers. Anomali was mentioned in two out of five: in two of the three ChatGPT answers, but not in either of the two Google AI Overviews. Mandiant was listed before Anomali in three out of five answers.
Most recommended by AI
Brands get a higher ranking if they are mentioned earlier in the answers.
Mentioned by AI
Each dot is one answer, filled in when that answer mentions the brand.
- Mandiant5 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 2 of 2 Google answers
Recorded Future5 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 2 of 2 Google answers- Google Threat Intelligence5 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 2 of 2 Google answers
CrowdStrike4 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers- MISP3 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
- Anomali2 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
- OpenCTI2 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
ThreatConnect2 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers- Group-IB Threat Intelligence2 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 2 of 2 Google answers
Flashpoint1 of 5Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
See every answer about threat intelligence platforms
5 answers
Asked ChatGPT
“Which threat intelligence platform should I use?”
Asked ChatGPT
“What are the best threat intelligence platforms?”
Asked ChatGPT
“What's the best threat intelligence platform for a security team?”
Searched Google, AI Overview
“threat intelligence platforms”
Searched Google, AI Overview
“threat intelligence software”
Brands are shown in the order each answer named them. The survey took place in the United States on October 21, 2026.
Is Anomali or Mandiant more popular in search?
This chart shows how often people search Google for Anomali and Mandiant by name. Each line represents a brand's share of searches for all ten threat intelligence platforms we track, month by month, from English-language searches worldwide.
Share of searches by month for Anomali, Mandiant. The figures are in the table below the chart.
View monthly share of searches table
| Month | Flashpoint | Anomali | Mandiant | MISP | Recorded Future | OpenCTI | Google Threat Intelligence | CrowdStrike | ThreatConnect | Group-IB Threat Intelligence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 2025 | 44.2% | 36.3% | 4% | 4.9% | 4.9% | 3.3% | 0.97% | 0.35% | 1.2% | 0.07% |
| Nov 2025 | 43.2% | 35.4% | 4.7% | 4.7% | 5.8% | 3.9% | 1.2% | 0.42% | 0.63% | 0.06% |
| Dec 2025 | 44.1% | 36.1% | 4.8% | 4.8% | 4.8% | 3.2% | 0.96% | 0.35% | 0.64% | 0.06% |
| Jan 2026 | 44.1% | 36.1% | 4.8% | 4.8% | 4.8% | 3.2% | 0.96% | 0.43% | 0.64% | 0.06% |
| Feb 2026 | 41.8% | 34.1% | 5.6% | 5.6% | 5.6% | 4.6% | 1.4% | 0.5% | 0.74% | 0.07% |
| Mar 2026 | 42.7% | 34.9% | 4.7% | 5.7% | 5.7% | 3.8% | 1.4% | 0.34% | 0.62% | 0.08% |
| Apr 2026 | 38.5% | 38.5% | 6.3% | 5.2% | 5.2% | 4.2% | 1.3% | 0.37% | 0.54% | 0.07% |
| May 2026 | 46.8% | 31.2% | 5.1% | 5.1% | 5.1% | 4.2% | 1.5% | 0.37% | 0.45% | 0.06% |
| Jun 2026 | 45.1% | 30.3% | 6.1% | 6.1% | 6.1% | 4% | 1.5% | 0.33% | 0.53% | 0.07% |
| Jul 2026 | 45.6% | 30.6% | 5% | 6.1% | 6.1% | 4.1% | 1.5% | 0.34% | 0.54% | 0.09% |
| Aug 2026 | 51.2% | 28.1% | 5.6% | 4.6% | 5.6% | 3.1% | 1.1% | 0.31% | 0.4% | 0.08% |
| Sep 2026 | 45.2% | 30.3% | 6.1% | 6.1% | 6.1% | 4.1% | 1.2% | 0.44% | 0.44% | 0.11% |
How has the Anomali and Mandiant comparison changed over the last 12 months?
3 findings
- Anomali was ahead of Mandiant in every measured month of the 12 months ending September 2026.
- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, Anomali’s share of searches among threat intelligence platforms worldwide moved from 36.3% to 30.3%, and its estimated monthly branded searches moved from 165K to 90.5K.
- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, Mandiant’s share of searches among threat intelligence platforms worldwide moved from 4% to 6.1%, and its estimated monthly branded searches held steady at 18.1K.
How did search popularity change for threat intelligence platforms worldwide in September 2026?
1 change
In September 2026, Anomali gained share of searches among threat intelligence platforms worldwide, from 28.1% to 30.3%.
How are branded searches counted?
2 search terms
Brandwave collects information about searches that people make online using Anomali’s and Mandiant’s names. When viewed over time, estimated search volumes for these branded terms can be used to understand whether interest in the brands is growing, holding steady, or fading.
Other head-to-heads among threat intelligence platforms
Put your own brand in this comparison
Brandwave tracks your branded demand next to the rival you actually watch, with your campaigns, spend and outcomes on the same timeline.