How popular isGroup-IB Threat Intelligence?
In September 2026, people searched for Group-IB Threat Intelligence by name about 320 times worldwide, about the same as the previous year. These searches made up 0.11% of all global threat intelligence platform searches, placing Group-IB Threat Intelligence tenth out of ten platforms. When we asked both ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews about threat intelligence platforms, Group-IB Threat Intelligence appeared in two of the five answers and was the eighth most recommended of the ten.
Group-IB Threat Intelligence is the tenth most searched of 10 competitors and the eighth most recommended in AI answers.
FlashpointShare of searches 45.2%Mentioned in 1 of 5 AI answersPlace in AI recommendations 10th
AnomaliShare of searches 30.3%Mentioned in 2 of 5 AI answersPlace in AI recommendations 4th
MandiantShare of searches 6.1%Mentioned in 5 of 5 AI answersPlace in AI recommendations 5th- MISPShare of searches 6.1%Mentioned in 3 of 5 AI answersPlace in AI recommendations 3rd
- Group-IB Threat IntelligenceShare of searches 0.11%Mentioned in 2 of 5 AI answersPlace in AI recommendations 8th
Follow Group-IB Threat Intelligence and get free monthly updates on what changed
By continuing you'll get index updates and occasional product news from Brandwave. Unsubscribe any time. Privacy
Top threat intelligence platforms in ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews
In three ChatGPT questions and two Google AI Overviews, Group-IB Threat Intelligence was mentioned in two out of five: not in any of the three ChatGPT answers, but in both Google AI Overviews. Group-IB Threat Intelligence is the eighth most recommended of the ten.
Most recommended by AI
Brands get a higher ranking if they are mentioned earlier in the answers.
Mentioned by AI
Each dot is one answer, filled in when that answer mentions the brand.
Mandiant5 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 2 of 2 Google answers
Recorded Future5 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 2 of 2 Google answers- Google Threat Intelligence5 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 2 of 2 Google answers
CrowdStrike4 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers- MISP3 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
Anomali2 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers- OpenCTI2 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
ThreatConnect2 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers- Group-IB Threat Intelligence2 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 2 of 2 Google answers
Flashpoint1 of 5Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
See every answer about threat intelligence platforms
5 answers
Asked ChatGPT
“Which threat intelligence platform should I use?”
Asked ChatGPT
“What are the best threat intelligence platforms?”
Asked ChatGPT
“What's the best threat intelligence platform for a security team?”
Searched Google, AI Overview
“threat intelligence platforms”
Searched Google, AI Overview
“threat intelligence software”
Brands are shown in the order each answer named them. The survey took place in the United States on October 21, 2026.
Which threat intelligence platforms compete with Group-IB Threat Intelligence?
Share of searches by month for Flashpoint, Anomali, Mandiant, MISP, Recorded Future, OpenCTI, Group-IB Threat Intelligence. The figures are in the table below the chart.
View monthly share of searches table
| Month | Flashpoint | Anomali | Mandiant | MISP | Recorded Future | OpenCTI | Google Threat Intelligence | CrowdStrike | ThreatConnect | Group-IB Threat Intelligence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 2025 | 44.2% | 36.3% | 4% | 4.9% | 4.9% | 3.3% | 0.97% | 0.35% | 1.2% | 0.07% |
| Nov 2025 | 43.2% | 35.4% | 4.7% | 4.7% | 5.8% | 3.9% | 1.2% | 0.42% | 0.63% | 0.06% |
| Dec 2025 | 44.1% | 36.1% | 4.8% | 4.8% | 4.8% | 3.2% | 0.96% | 0.35% | 0.64% | 0.06% |
| Jan 2026 | 44.1% | 36.1% | 4.8% | 4.8% | 4.8% | 3.2% | 0.96% | 0.43% | 0.64% | 0.06% |
| Feb 2026 | 41.8% | 34.1% | 5.6% | 5.6% | 5.6% | 4.6% | 1.4% | 0.5% | 0.74% | 0.07% |
| Mar 2026 | 42.7% | 34.9% | 4.7% | 5.7% | 5.7% | 3.8% | 1.4% | 0.34% | 0.62% | 0.08% |
| Apr 2026 | 38.5% | 38.5% | 6.3% | 5.2% | 5.2% | 4.2% | 1.3% | 0.37% | 0.54% | 0.07% |
| May 2026 | 46.8% | 31.2% | 5.1% | 5.1% | 5.1% | 4.2% | 1.5% | 0.37% | 0.45% | 0.06% |
| Jun 2026 | 45.1% | 30.3% | 6.1% | 6.1% | 6.1% | 4% | 1.5% | 0.33% | 0.53% | 0.07% |
| Jul 2026 | 45.6% | 30.6% | 5% | 6.1% | 6.1% | 4.1% | 1.5% | 0.34% | 0.54% | 0.09% |
| Aug 2026 | 51.2% | 28.1% | 5.6% | 4.6% | 5.6% | 3.1% | 1.1% | 0.31% | 0.4% | 0.08% |
| Sep 2026 | 45.2% | 30.3% | 6.1% | 6.1% | 6.1% | 4.1% | 1.2% | 0.44% | 0.44% | 0.11% |
| Rank | Brand | Share of searches | Estimated monthly branded searches | vs prior month | Share change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1, held 1st | 45.2% | 135K | -18.2% | -5.9 points | |
| 2, held 2nd | 30.3% | 90.5K | 0% | +2.3 points | |
| 3, held 3rd | 6.1% | 18.1K | 0% | +0.5 points | |
| 4, moved from 5th to 4th | 6.1% | 18.1K | +22.3% | +1.5 pointsmoved from 5th to 4th | |
| 5, moved from 4th to 5th | 6.1% | 18.1K | 0% | +0.5 pointsmoved from 4th to 5th | |
| 6, held 6th | 4.1% | 12.1K | +22.2% | +1 points | |
| 7, held 7th | 1.2% | 3.6K | 0% | +0.1 points | |
| 8, moved from 9th to 8th | 0.44% | 1.3K | +30% | +0.1 pointsmoved from 9th to 8th | |
| 9, moved from 8th to 9th | 0.44% | 1.3K | 0% | 0 pointsmoved from 8th to 9th | |
| 10, held 10th | 0.11% | 320 | +23.1% | 0 points |
45.2%
Held 1st. 135K estimated branded searches, -18.2% vs prior month. Share -5.9 points.
2.
Anomali30.3%
Held 2nd. 90.5K estimated branded searches, 0% vs prior month. Share +2.3 points.
3.
Mandiant6.1%
Held 3rd. 18.1K estimated branded searches, 0% vs prior month. Share +0.5 points.
4.MISP
6.1%
Moved from 5th to 4th. 18.1K estimated branded searches, +22.3% vs prior month. Share +1.5 points.
6.1%
Moved from 4th to 5th. 18.1K estimated branded searches, 0% vs prior month. Share +0.5 points.
6.OpenCTI
4.1%
Held 6th. 12.1K estimated branded searches, +22.2% vs prior month. Share +1 points.
Held 7th. 3.6K estimated branded searches, 0% vs prior month. Share +0.1 points.
0.44%
Moved from 9th to 8th. 1.3K estimated branded searches, +30% vs prior month. Share +0.1 points.
0.44%
Moved from 8th to 9th. 1.3K estimated branded searches, 0% vs prior month. Share 0 points.
10.Group-IB Threat Intelligence
0.11%
Held 10th. 320 estimated branded searches, +23.1% vs prior month. Share 0 points.
Compare popularity between Group-IB Threat Intelligence and its closest rivals
Group-IB Threat Intelligence vs Recorded Future: compare popularity- Group-IB Threat Intelligence vs OpenCTI: compare popularity
- Group-IB Threat Intelligence vs Google Threat Intelligence: compare popularity
Group-IB Threat Intelligence vs CrowdStrike: compare popularity
Group-IB Threat Intelligence vs ThreatConnect: compare popularity- Compare Group-IB Threat Intelligence with any brand
Every comparison with Group-IB Threat Intelligence
9 comparisons
- Anomali vs Group-IB Threat Intelligence
- CrowdStrike vs Group-IB Threat Intelligence
- Flashpoint vs Group-IB Threat Intelligence
- Google Threat Intelligence vs Group-IB Threat Intelligence
- Group-IB Threat Intelligence vs Mandiant
- Group-IB Threat Intelligence vs MISP
- Group-IB Threat Intelligence vs OpenCTI
- Group-IB Threat Intelligence vs Recorded Future
- Group-IB Threat Intelligence vs ThreatConnect
How has branded search demand for Group-IB Threat Intelligence changed worldwide over the last 12 months?
2 findings
- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, estimated monthly branded searches for Group-IB Threat Intelligence worldwide held steady at 320.
- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, Group-IB Threat Intelligence’s share of searches among threat intelligence platforms worldwide held steady, from 0.07% to 0.11%.
How did search popularity change for threat intelligence platforms worldwide in September 2026?
6 changes
In September 2026, MISP overtook Recorded Future to rank 4th among threat intelligence platforms worldwide, with 6.1% of the searches.

In September 2026, Anomali gained share of searches among threat intelligence platforms worldwide, from 28.1% to 30.3%.
In September 2026, OpenCTI gained share of searches among threat intelligence platforms worldwide, from 3.1% to 4.1%.

In September 2026, Flashpoint lost share of searches among threat intelligence platforms worldwide, from 51.2% to 45.2%.

In September 2026, CrowdStrike rose from 9th to 8th among threat intelligence platforms worldwide.

In September 2026, ThreatConnect fell from 8th to 9th among threat intelligence platforms worldwide.
How are Group-IB Threat Intelligence’s branded searches counted?
1 search term
Brandwave collects information about searches that people make online using Group-IB Threat Intelligence’s name. When viewed over time, estimated search volumes for this branded term can be used to understand whether interest in the brand is growing, holding steady, or fading.
- group ib threat intelligence
Do you work for Group-IB Threat Intelligence? To request corrections or removal please contact us via our support page and we will be happy to assist.

Is Group-IB Threat Intelligence your brand?
Put your own campaigns, spend and outcomes next to this demand line, so you can see which of your marketing lined up with the movements above.