Brandwave

ESLint vs SonarQube:Which is more popular?

In September 2026, SonarQube had more branded searches than ESLint among static analysis tools worldwide. SonarQube had about 110,000 branded searches, while ESLint had 27,100. SonarQube made up 45.3% of all static analysis tool searches we track, and ESLint accounted for 11.2%. When we asked ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews about static analysis tools, SonarQube appeared in all five answers and ESLint in four. SonarQube was mentioned before ESLint in four out of five answers.

Among static analysis tools worldwide in September 2026

Who do people search for more?

SonarQube, about 4 searches for every 1 for ESLint

SonarQube 110K searchesESLint 27.1K searches

Who does AI mention more?

SonarQube, mentioned in every answer we collected

SonarQube in 5 of 5ESLint in 4 of 5

Who does AI recommend more?

SonarQube, named ahead of ESLint in 4 of 5 answers

SonarQube first in 4ESLint first in 1

Follow ESLint vs SonarQube and get free monthly updates on what changed

By continuing you'll get index updates and occasional product news from Brandwave. Unsubscribe any time. Privacy

Track your brand against a rival →

Top static analysis tools in ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews

In three ChatGPT questions and two Google AI Overviews, SonarQube appeared in all five answers. ESLint was mentioned in four out of five: in all three ChatGPT answers and in one of the two Google AI Overviews. SonarQube was listed before ESLint in four out of five answers.

Most recommended by AI

Brands get a higher ranking if they are mentioned earlier in the answers.

  1. SonarQube1st
  2. Semgrep2nd
  3. CodeQL3rd
  4. ESLint4th
  5. Snyk Code5th
  6. SpotBugs6th
  7. Coverity7th
  8. Ruff8th
  9. Checkmarx9th
  10. Veracode10th
  11. +4 more

Mentioned by AI

Each dot is one answer, filled in when that answer mentions the brand.

  • SonarQube5 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 2 of 2 Google answers
  • Semgrep5 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 2 of 2 Google answers
  • CodeQL5 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 2 of 2 Google answers
  • ESLint4 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
  • Snyk Code3 of 5Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 2 of 2 Google answers
  • Coverity2 of 5Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
  • Ruff2 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
  • SpotBugs2 of 5Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
  • Checkmarx1 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
  • Veracode1 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers

+4 more

See every answer about static analysis tools

5 answers

Brands are shown in the order each answer named them. The survey took place in the United States on October 21, 2026.

Is ESLint or SonarQube more popular in search?

This chart shows how often people search Google for ESLint and SonarQube by name. Each line represents a brand's share of searches for all 14 static analysis tools we track, month by month, from English-language searches worldwide.

ESLint and SonarQube among static analysis tools worldwide, by month

Share of searches by month for SonarQube, ESLint. The figures are in the table below the chart.

View monthly share of searches table
MonthSonarQubeSemgrepESLintCheckmarxCodeQLVeracodeCoverityRuffCodacySpotBugsSnyk CodeGitHub CodeQLCode ClimateBlack Duck Coverity
Oct 202549.5%8.1%14.8%6.7%4.4%5.4%3%3.1%2%0.87%0.74%0.39%0.87%0.12%
Nov 202548.4%8%14.5%6.5%5.3%5.3%3.6%3%2.4%0.86%0.7%0.47%0.86%0.09%
Dec 202550.1%8.2%15%6.7%4.5%4.5%3%3%2%0.89%0.72%0.48%0.71%0.1%
Jan 202647.5%9.5%14.3%6.4%5.2%5.2%3.5%3.5%1.9%0.85%0.68%0.46%0.85%0.11%
Feb 202646.6%9.4%17.1%6.2%5.1%5.1%2.8%2.9%1.9%0.66%0.84%0.45%0.83%0.11%
Mar 202649.8%10%12.2%8.2%4.5%4.5%3%3%1.6%0.73%1.1%0.48%0.73%0.12%
Apr 202645.8%11.2%11.2%11.2%5%5%2.8%2.8%1.8%0.82%1%0.44%0.65%0.11%
May 202648.4%11.9%11.9%8%5.3%5.3%2.4%2.9%1.6%0.68%0.69%0.47%0.57%0.09%
Jun 202649.9%12.2%10%6.7%5.5%5.5%3%3%1.6%0.7%0.71%0.48%0.59%0.12%
Jul 202644.8%13.5%11%7.4%6%6%3.3%3.3%1.8%0.77%0.79%0.53%0.53%0.16%
Aug 202647.7%11.7%11.7%7.8%5.2%5.2%2.9%3.6%1.6%0.69%0.71%0.56%0.43%0.11%
Sep 202645.3%13.6%11.2%7.5%6.1%5%4.1%3.3%1.5%0.78%0.67%0.54%0.41%0.13%

How has the ESLint and SonarQube comparison changed over the last 12 months?

3 findings
  • SonarQube was ahead of ESLint in every measured month of the 12 months ending September 2026.
  • Across the 12 months ending September 2026, ESLint’s share of searches among static analysis tools worldwide moved from 14.8% to 11.2%, and its estimated monthly branded searches moved from 49.5K to 27.1K.
  • Across the 12 months ending September 2026, SonarQube’s share of searches among static analysis tools worldwide moved from 49.5% to 45.3%, and its estimated monthly branded searches moved from 165K to 110K.

How did search popularity change for static analysis tools worldwide in September 2026?

3 changes
  1. In September 2026, Semgrep overtook ESLint to rank 2nd among static analysis tools worldwide, with 13.6% of the searches.

  2. In September 2026, SonarQube lost share of searches among static analysis tools worldwide, from 47.7% to 45.3%.

  3. In September 2026, ESLint lost share of searches among static analysis tools worldwide, from 11.7% to 11.2%.

How are branded searches counted?

2 search terms

Brandwave collects information about searches that people make online using ESLint’s and SonarQube’s names. When viewed over time, estimated search volumes for these branded terms can be used to understand whether interest in the brands is growing, holding steady, or fading.

ESLint

1 branded search term

  • eslint

SonarQube

1 branded search term

  • sonarqube

How the Brand Demand Index is measured

Other head-to-heads among static analysis tools

Creator with pink hair and a pink jacket

Put your own brand in this comparison

Brandwave tracks your branded demand next to the rival you actually watch, with your campaigns, spend and outcomes on the same timeline.