Brandwave

Algolia vs Dynamic Yield:Which is more popular?

In September 2026, Algolia had more branded searches than Dynamic Yield among ecommerce personalization platforms worldwide. Algolia had about 40,500 branded searches, while Dynamic Yield had 4,440. Algolia made up 56.1% of all ecommerce personalization platform searches we track, and Dynamic Yield accounted for 6.1%. When we asked ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews about ecommerce personalization platforms, Dynamic Yield appeared in four of the five answers and Algolia in two. Dynamic Yield was mentioned before Algolia in every answer that named either.

Among ecommerce personalization platforms worldwide in September 2026

Who do people search for more?

Algolia, about 9 searches for every 1 for Dynamic Yield

Algolia 40.5K searchesDynamic Yield 4.4K searches

Who does AI mention more?

Dynamic Yield, mentioned in 4 of 5 answers, Algolia in 2

Dynamic Yield in 4 of 5Algolia in 2 of 5

Who does AI recommend more?

Dynamic Yield, named ahead of Algolia in 4 of 4 answers

Dynamic Yield first in 4Algolia never first

Follow Algolia vs Dynamic Yield and get free monthly updates on what changed

By continuing you'll get index updates and occasional product news from Brandwave. Unsubscribe any time. Privacy

Track your brand against a rival →

Top ecommerce personalization platforms in ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews

In three ChatGPT questions and two Google AI Overviews, Dynamic Yield was mentioned in four out of five: in all three ChatGPT answers and in one of the two Google AI Overviews. Algolia was mentioned in two out of five: in two of the three ChatGPT answers, but not in either of the two Google AI Overviews. Dynamic Yield was listed before Algolia in every answer that named either.

Most recommended by AI

Brands get a higher ranking if they are mentioned earlier in the answers.

  1. Bloomreach1st
  2. Nosto2nd
  3. Dynamic Yield3rd
  4. Insider4th
  5. Rebuy5th
  6. Algolia6th
  7. Recombee–
  8. Clerk.io–
  9. LimeSpot–

Mentioned by AI

Each dot is one answer, filled in when that answer mentions the brand.

  • Bloomreach5 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 2 of 2 Google answers
  • Nosto4 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
  • Dynamic Yield4 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
  • Insider3 of 5Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 2 of 2 Google answers
  • Algolia2 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
  • Rebuy2 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
  • Recombee0 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
  • Clerk.io0 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
  • LimeSpot0 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers

See every answer about ecommerce personalization platforms

5 answers

Not named in any answer:

Brands are shown in the order each answer named them. The survey took place in the United States on October 20, 2026.

Is Algolia or Dynamic Yield more popular in search?

This chart shows how often people search Google for Algolia and Dynamic Yield by name. Each line represents a brand's share of searches for all nine ecommerce personalization platforms we track, month by month, from English-language searches worldwide.

Algolia and Dynamic Yield among ecommerce personalization platforms worldwide, by month

Share of searches by month for Algolia, Dynamic Yield. The figures are in the table below the chart.

View monthly share of searches table
MonthAlgoliaBloomreachNostoDynamic YieldRecombeeRebuyClerk.ioLimeSpotInsider
Oct 202557.9%21.2%7.9%7.8%2.2%1%0.84%0.64%0.46%
Nov 202560.9%18.2%8.3%8.2%2%0.73%0.73%0.54%0.48%
Dec 202560.5%18.1%10%6.6%1.9%0.72%0.88%0.66%0.58%
Jan 202659.2%21.6%8.1%6.5%1.9%0.86%0.86%0.53%0.47%
Feb 202654.6%24.4%9%7.3%1.8%0.97%0.97%0.58%0.43%
Mar 202657.3%21%7.8%9.4%1.9%0.83%0.83%0.53%0.45%
Apr 202659.3%21.7%8%6.5%1.9%0.71%0.86%0.53%0.38%
May 202657.4%21%9.5%7.7%1.8%0.84%0.84%0.6%0.3%
Jun 202657.6%21.1%9.5%7.7%1.4%0.84%0.84%0.6%0.37%
Jul 202658.8%21.5%9.7%6.4%1.5%0.7%0.7%0.41%0.3%
Aug 202658.8%21.5%9.7%6.4%1.5%0.7%0.7%0.49%0.25%
Sep 202656.1%25.1%9.2%6.1%1.4%0.82%0.66%0.37%0.24%

How has the Algolia and Dynamic Yield comparison changed over the last 12 months?

3 findings

How did search popularity change for ecommerce personalization platforms worldwide in September 2026?

2 changes

  1. In September 2026, Algolia lost share of searches among ecommerce personalization platforms worldwide, from 58.8% to 56.1%.

  2. Dynamic Yield’s share of searches among ecommerce personalization platforms worldwide has lost ground for 3 months in a row, from 7.7% to 6.1% in September 2026.

How are branded searches counted?

3 search terms

Brandwave collects information about searches that people make online using Algolia’s and Dynamic Yield’s names. When viewed over time, estimated search volumes for these branded terms can be used to understand whether interest in the brands is growing, holding steady, or fading.

Algolia

1 branded search term

  • algolia

Dynamic Yield

2 branded search terms

  • dynamic yield
  • dynamic yield personalization

How the Brand Demand Index is measured

Other head-to-heads among ecommerce personalization platforms

Creator with pink hair and a pink jacket

Put your own brand in this comparison

Brandwave tracks your branded demand next to the rival you actually watch, with your campaigns, spend and outcomes on the same timeline.

Start free