Brandwave

Cursor vs OpenAI Codex:Which is more popular?

In September 2026, OpenAI Codex had more branded searches than Cursor among AI coding assistants worldwide. OpenAI Codex had about 992,000 branded searches, while Cursor had 616,000. OpenAI Codex made up 13.9% of all AI coding assistant searches we track, and Cursor accounted for 8.6%. When we asked ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews about AI coding assistants, Cursor appeared in all five answers and OpenAI Codex in three. Cursor was mentioned before OpenAI Codex in every answer.

Among AI coding assistants worldwide in September 2026

Who do people search for more?

OpenAI Codex, about 61% more searches than Cursor

OpenAI Codex 992K searchesCursor 616K searches

Who does AI mention more?

Cursor, mentioned in every answer we collected

Cursor in 5 of 5OpenAI Codex in 3 of 5

Who does AI recommend more?

Cursor, named ahead of OpenAI Codex in every answer

Cursor first in 5OpenAI Codex never first

Follow Cursor vs OpenAI Codex and get free monthly updates on what changed

By continuing you'll get index updates and occasional product news from Brandwave. Unsubscribe any time. Privacy

Track your brand against a rival →

Top AI coding assistants in ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews

In three ChatGPT questions and two Google AI Overviews, Cursor appeared in all five answers. OpenAI Codex was mentioned in three out of five: in all three ChatGPT answers, but not in either of the two Google AI Overviews. Cursor was listed before OpenAI Codex in every answer.

Most recommended by AI

Brands get a higher ranking if they are mentioned earlier in the answers.

  1. Cursor1st
  2. Claude Code2nd
  3. GitHub Copilot3rd
  4. OpenAI Codex4th
  5. Replit5th
  6. Windsurf6th
  7. Lovable7th
  8. Bolt8th

Mentioned by AI

Each dot is one answer, filled in when that answer mentions the brand.

  • Claude Code5 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 2 of 2 Google answers
  • Cursor5 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 2 of 2 Google answers
  • GitHub Copilot5 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 2 of 2 Google answers
  • OpenAI Codex3 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
  • Windsurf2 of 5Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
  • Replit1 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
  • Bolt1 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
  • Lovable1 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers

See every answer about AI coding assistants

5 answers

Brands are shown in the order each answer named them. The survey took place in the United States on October 20, 2026.

Is Cursor or OpenAI Codex more popular in search?

This chart shows how often people search Google for Cursor and OpenAI Codex by name. Each line represents a brand's share of searches for all eight AI coding assistants we track, month by month, from English-language searches worldwide.

Cursor and OpenAI Codex among AI coding assistants worldwide, by month

Share of searches by month for OpenAI Codex, Cursor. The figures are in the table below the chart.

View monthly share of searches table
MonthClaude CodeReplitOpenAI CodexCursorGitHub CopilotBoltLovableWindsurf
Oct 202524.9%25.2%7.9%17.7%17.1%2.3%1.9%3.1%
Nov 202528%22.9%6.5%19.5%15.6%2%2%3.4%
Dec 202531.4%26.8%5.3%15.6%14.7%1.6%2%2.7%
Jan 202650.9%19.9%4.1%11.7%9.3%0.97%1.4%1.6%
Feb 202650.2%16.2%11.5%9.6%9.1%0.79%1.2%1.5%
Mar 202656.8%14.8%7%8.7%10%0.59%0.88%1.3%
Apr 202655%14.3%8%8.1%11.6%0.57%1.3%1.2%
May 202648.7%15.6%14.5%7.6%10.2%0.76%1.4%1.2%
Jun 202649.2%15.7%11%10.9%9.1%1.1%1.4%1.6%
Jul 202646.2%18.3%14.6%9%7.1%1.6%2%1.3%
Aug 202643.2%20.9%13.1%10.1%7.9%1.8%1.8%1.1%
Sep 202643.7%21.4%13.9%8.6%8.2%1.5%1.5%1.2%

How has the Cursor and OpenAI Codex comparison changed over the last 12 months?

3 findings
  • The lead changed hands 3 times in the 12 months ending September 2026: OpenAI Codex took it in February 2026, Cursor took it in March 2026, OpenAI Codex took it in May 2026.
  • Across the 12 months ending September 2026, Cursor’s share of searches among AI coding assistants worldwide moved from 17.7% to 8.6%, and its estimated monthly branded searches moved from 864K to 616K.
  • Across the 12 months ending September 2026, OpenAI Codex’s share of searches among AI coding assistants worldwide moved from 7.9% to 13.9%, and its estimated monthly branded searches moved from 386K to 992K.

How did search popularity change for AI coding assistants worldwide in September 2026?

2 changes
  1. In September 2026, OpenAI Codex gained share of searches among AI coding assistants worldwide, from 13.1% to 13.9%.

  2. In September 2026, Cursor lost share of searches among AI coding assistants worldwide, from 10.1% to 8.6%.

How are branded searches counted?

44 search terms

Brandwave collects information about searches that people make online using Cursor’s and OpenAI Codex’s names. When viewed over time, estimated search volumes for these branded terms can be used to understand whether interest in the brands is growing, holding steady, or fading.

Cursor

21 branded search terms

  • anysphere cursor
  • cursor agent
  • cursor agents
  • cursor ai
  • cursor ai agent
  • cursor ai app
  • cursor ai coding
  • cursor ai editor
  • cursor ai ide
  • cursor ai pro
  • cursor app
  • cursor bugbot
  • cursor cli
  • cursor code
  • cursor coding
  • cursor composer
  • cursor ide
  • cursor pro
  • cursor sh
  • cursor vscode
  • cursor.sh

OpenAI Codex

23 branded search terms

  • ai codex
  • chatgpt codex
  • codex agent
  • codex ai
  • codex ai coding
  • codex app
  • codex chatgpt
  • codex cli
  • codex coding
  • codex desktop
  • codex extension
  • codex github
  • codex ide
  • codex mac
  • codex open ai
  • codex openai
  • codex vscode
  • open ai codex
  • openai codex
  • openai codex cli
  • openai codex github
  • openai's codex
  • openaicodex

How the Brand Demand Index is measured

Other head-to-heads among AI coding assistants

Creator with pink hair and a pink jacket

Put your own brand in this comparison

Brandwave tracks your branded demand next to the rival you actually watch, with your campaigns, spend and outcomes on the same timeline.