How popular isTime To Pet?
In September 2026, people searched for Time To Pet by name about 22,200 times worldwide, about the same as the previous year. These searches made up 26.6% of all global dog daycare software searches, placing Time To Pet first out of 14 brands. When we asked both ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews about dog daycare software, Time To Pet appeared in two of the five answers and was the fifth most recommended of the 14.
Time To Pet is the most searched of 14 competitors and the fifth most recommended in AI answers.
Time To PetShare of searches 26.6%Mentioned in 2 of 5 AI answersPlace in AI recommendations 5th
GingrShare of searches 21.7%Mentioned in 5 of 5 AI answersPlace in AI recommendations 1st
Paw PartnerShare of searches 11.4%Mentioned in 4 of 5 AI answersPlace in AI recommendations 3rd
MoeGoShare of searches 9.9%Mentioned in 0 of 5 AI answersPlace in AI recommendations –
DoggieDashboardShare of searches 7.9%Mentioned in 3 of 5 AI answersPlace in AI recommendations 4th
Follow Time To Pet and get free monthly updates on what changed
By continuing you'll get index updates and occasional product news from Brandwave. Unsubscribe any time. Privacy
Top dog daycare software in ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews
In three ChatGPT questions and two Google AI Overviews, Time To Pet was mentioned in two out of five: not in any of the three ChatGPT answers, but in both Google AI Overviews. Time To Pet is the fifth most recommended of the 14.
Most recommended by AI
Brands get a higher ranking if they are mentioned earlier in the answers.
Gingr1st
ProPet2nd
Paw Partner3rd
DoggieDashboard4th
Time To Pet5th
PetExec6th
Kennel Connection7th
KennelBooker8th
Pawfinity9th
MoeGo–- +4 more
Mentioned by AI
Each dot is one answer, filled in when that answer mentions the brand.
Gingr5 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 2 of 2 Google answers
ProPet5 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 2 of 2 Google answers
Paw Partner4 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 2 of 2 Google answers
DoggieDashboard3 of 5Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 2 of 2 Google answers
Time To Pet2 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 2 of 2 Google answers
KennelBooker2 of 5Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
PetExec2 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
Kennel Connection2 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
Pawfinity1 of 5Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
MoeGo0 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
See every answer about dog daycare software
5 answers
Asked ChatGPT
“Which dog daycare software should I use?”
Asked ChatGPT
“What are the best dog daycare software systems?”
Asked ChatGPT
“What's the best dog daycare software for a boarding kennel?”
Searched Google, AI Overview
“dog daycare software”
Searched Google, AI Overview
“dog boarding software”
Not named in any answer:
Brands are shown in the order each answer named them. The survey took place in the United States on October 22, 2026.
Which dog daycare software compete with Time To Pet?
Share of searches by month for Time To Pet, Gingr, Paw Partner, MoeGo, DoggieDashboard, Revelation Pets, Pawfinity, KennelBooker, PetExec. The figures are in the table below the chart.
View monthly share of searches table
| Month | Time To Pet | Gingr | Paw Partner | MoeGo | DoggieDashboard | Revelation Pets | Pawfinity | KennelBooker | PetExec | DaySmart Pet | Kennel Connection | Kennel Link | ProPet | PetLinx |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 2025 | 25.1% | 20.5% | 8.9% | 9.5% | 7.5% | 6.1% | 6.1% | 4.1% | 9.2% | 1.7% | 0.82% | 0.16% | 0.12% | 0.12% |
| Nov 2025 | 26.5% | 21.6% | 9.4% | 8.2% | 6.4% | 6.4% | 6.4% | 4.3% | 7.9% | 1.4% | 0.86% | 0.17% | 0.17% | 0.17% |
| Dec 2025 | 26.6% | 21.7% | 9.5% | 8.2% | 7.9% | 6.5% | 6.5% | 4.3% | 6.5% | 1.4% | 0.71% | 0.2% | 0.13% | 0.11% |
| Jan 2026 | 25.8% | 21% | 9.9% | 9.9% | 6.3% | 7.7% | 6.3% | 4.2% | 6.3% | 1.4% | 1% | 0.16% | 0.2% | 0.1% |
| Feb 2026 | 27.3% | 22.3% | 9% | 10.2% | 6.6% | 6.6% | 5.4% | 4.4% | 5.4% | 1.4% | 0.89% | 0.17% | 0.17% | 0.09% |
| Mar 2026 | 24.8% | 20.3% | 10.1% | 11.4% | 7.4% | 7.4% | 6% | 4.9% | 4.9% | 1.6% | 0.81% | 0.1% | 0.16% | 0.1% |
| Apr 2026 | 25.4% | 20.7% | 10.3% | 11.6% | 7.5% | 7.5% | 6.2% | 4.1% | 4.1% | 1.3% | 0.82% | 0.16% | 0.13% | 0.08% |
| May 2026 | 25.2% | 20.6% | 10.2% | 11.5% | 9.2% | 7.5% | 6.1% | 4.1% | 3.3% | 1.3% | 0.67% | 0.12% | 0.12% | 0.08% |
| Jun 2026 | 24.7% | 20.2% | 10% | 11.3% | 9% | 9% | 6% | 4% | 3.2% | 1.3% | 0.8% | 0.12% | 0.16% | 0.08% |
| Jul 2026 | 25.2% | 20.6% | 10.2% | 11.4% | 9.2% | 7.5% | 6.1% | 4.1% | 2.7% | 1.7% | 0.82% | 0.1% | 0.16% | 0.06% |
| Aug 2026 | 25.5% | 20.8% | 9.8% | 11.6% | 9.3% | 7.6% | 6.2% | 4.1% | 2.8% | 1.3% | 0.83% | 0.1% | 0.1% | 0.1% |
| Sep 2026 | 26.6% | 21.7% | 11.4% | 9.9% | 7.9% | 7.9% | 5.3% | 4.3% | 2.9% | 1.2% | 0.71% | 0.13% | 0.11% | 0.06% |
| Rank | Brand | Share of searches | Estimated monthly branded searches | vs prior month | Share change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1, held 1st | 26.6% | 22.2K | 0% | +1.1 points | |
| 2, held 2nd | 21.7% | 18.1K | 0% | +0.9 points | |
| 3, moved from 4th to 3rd | 11.4% | 9.5K | +11.8% | +1.6 pointsmoved from 4th to 3rd | |
| 4, moved from 3rd to 4th | 9.9% | 8.3K | -17.9% | -1.7 pointsmoved from 3rd to 4th | |
| 5, held 5th | 7.9% | 6.6K | -18.5% | -1.4 points | |
| 6, held 6th | 7.9% | 6.6K | 0% | +0.3 points | |
| 7, held 7th | 5.3% | 4.4K | -18.5% | -0.9 points | |
| 8, held 8th | 4.3% | 3.6K | 0% | +0.2 points | |
| 9, held 9th | 2.9% | 2.4K | 0% | +0.1 points | |
| 10, held 10th | 1.2% | 1K | -12.8% | -0.1 points | |
| 11, held 11th | 0.71% | 590 | -18.1% | -0.1 points | |
| 12, held 12th | 0.13% | 110 | +22.2% | 0 points | |
| 13, moved from 14th to 13th | 0.11% | 90 | 0% | 0 pointsmoved from 14th to 13th | |
| 14, moved from 13th to 14th | 0.06% | 50 | -44.4% | 0 pointsmoved from 13th to 14th |
26.6%
Held 1st. 22.2K estimated branded searches, 0% vs prior month. Share +1.1 points.
2.
Gingr21.7%
Held 2nd. 18.1K estimated branded searches, 0% vs prior month. Share +0.9 points.
11.4%
Moved from 4th to 3rd. 9.5K estimated branded searches, +11.8% vs prior month. Share +1.6 points.
4.
MoeGo9.9%
Moved from 3rd to 4th. 8.3K estimated branded searches, -17.9% vs prior month. Share -1.7 points.
7.9%
Held 5th. 6.6K estimated branded searches, -18.5% vs prior month. Share -1.4 points.
7.9%
Held 6th. 6.6K estimated branded searches, 0% vs prior month. Share +0.3 points.
5.3%
Held 7th. 4.4K estimated branded searches, -18.5% vs prior month. Share -0.9 points.
4.3%
Held 8th. 3.6K estimated branded searches, 0% vs prior month. Share +0.2 points.
9.
PetExec2.9%
Held 9th. 2.4K estimated branded searches, 0% vs prior month. Share +0.1 points.
10.
DaySmart Pet1.2%
Held 10th. 1K estimated branded searches, -12.8% vs prior month. Share -0.1 points.
0.71%
Held 11th. 590 estimated branded searches, -18.1% vs prior month. Share -0.1 points.
12.
Kennel Link0.13%
Held 12th. 110 estimated branded searches, +22.2% vs prior month. Share 0 points.
13.
ProPet0.11%
Moved from 14th to 13th. 90 estimated branded searches, 0% vs prior month. Share 0 points.
14.
PetLinx0.06%
Moved from 13th to 14th. 50 estimated branded searches, -44.4% vs prior month. Share 0 points.
Compare popularity between Time To Pet and its closest rivals
Every comparison with Time To Pet
13 comparisons
- Gingr vs Time To Pet
- Paw Partner vs Time To Pet
- MoeGo vs Time To Pet
- DoggieDashboard vs Time To Pet
- Revelation Pets vs Time To Pet
- Pawfinity vs Time To Pet
- KennelBooker vs Time To Pet
- PetExec vs Time To Pet
- DaySmart Pet vs Time To Pet
- Kennel Connection vs Time To Pet
- Kennel Link vs Time To Pet
- ProPet vs Time To Pet
- PetLinx vs Time To Pet
How has branded search demand for Time To Pet changed worldwide over the last 12 months?
3 findings
- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, estimated monthly branded searches for Time To Pet worldwide held steady at 22.2K.
- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, Time To Pet’s share of searches among dog daycare software worldwide increased from 25.1% to 26.6%.
- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, Time To Pet’s share of searches among dog daycare software worldwide peaked at 27.3% in February 2026 and was lowest at 24.7% in June 2026.
How did search popularity change for dog daycare software worldwide in September 2026?
6 changes

In September 2026, Paw Partner overtook MoeGo to rank 3rd among dog daycare software worldwide, with 11.4% of the searches.

In September 2026, Time To Pet gained share of searches among dog daycare software worldwide, from 25.5% to 26.6%.

In September 2026, Gingr gained share of searches among dog daycare software worldwide, from 20.8% to 21.7%.

In September 2026, MoeGo lost share of searches among dog daycare software worldwide, from 11.6% to 9.9%.

In September 2026, DoggieDashboard lost share of searches among dog daycare software worldwide, from 9.3% to 7.9%.

In September 2026, Pawfinity lost share of searches among dog daycare software worldwide, from 6.2% to 5.3%.
How are Time To Pet’s branded searches counted?
1 search term
Brandwave collects information about searches that people make online using Time To Pet’s name. When viewed over time, estimated search volumes for this branded term can be used to understand whether interest in the brand is growing, holding steady, or fading.
- time to pet
Do you work for Time To Pet? To request corrections or removal please contact us via our support page and we will be happy to assist.

Is Time To Pet your brand?
Put your own campaigns, spend and outcomes next to this demand line, so you can see which of your marketing lined up with the movements above.