How popular isOWASP Dependency-Track?
In September 2026, people searched for OWASP Dependency-Track by name about 9,900 times worldwide, a 22.2% increase from the previous year. These searches made up 11.2% of all global SBOM platform searches, placing OWASP Dependency-Track third out of ten platforms. When we asked both ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews about SBOM platforms, OWASP Dependency-Track appeared in three of the five answers and was the third most recommended of the ten.
OWASP Dependency-Track is the third most searched of 10 competitors and the third most recommended in AI answers.
SnykShare of searches 55.8%Mentioned in 3 of 5 AI answersPlace in AI recommendations 2nd
SyftShare of searches 13.6%Mentioned in 3 of 5 AI answersPlace in AI recommendations 4th
OWASP Dependency-TrackShare of searches 11.2%Mentioned in 3 of 5 AI answersPlace in AI recommendations 3rd
CycloneDXShare of searches 9.1%Mentioned in 5 of 5 AI answersPlace in AI recommendations 8th
AnchoreShare of searches 5%Mentioned in 4 of 5 AI answersPlace in AI recommendations 1st
Follow OWASP Dependency-Track and get free monthly updates on what changed
By continuing you'll get index updates and occasional product news from Brandwave. Unsubscribe any time. Privacy
Top SBOM platforms in ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews
In three ChatGPT questions and two Google AI Overviews, OWASP Dependency-Track was mentioned in three out of five: in all three ChatGPT answers, but not in either of the two Google AI Overviews. OWASP Dependency-Track is the third most recommended of the ten.
Most recommended by AI
Brands get a higher ranking if they are mentioned earlier in the answers.
Anchore1st
Snyk2nd
OWASP Dependency-Track3rd
Syft4th
Black Duck5th
FOSSA6th- JFrog Xray7th
CycloneDX8th
Mend–
Cybeats–
Mentioned by AI
Each dot is one answer, filled in when that answer mentions the brand.
CycloneDX5 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 2 of 2 Google answers
Anchore4 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
Snyk3 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
Syft3 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
OWASP Dependency-Track3 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers- JFrog Xray2 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
Black Duck2 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
FOSSA2 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
Mend0 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
Cybeats0 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
See every answer about SBOM platforms
5 answers
Asked ChatGPT
“Which SBOM platform should I use?”
Asked ChatGPT
“What are the best SBOM platforms?”
Asked ChatGPT
“What's the best SBOM platform for a software team?”
Searched Google, AI Overview
“sbom tools”
Searched Google, AI Overview
“software bill of materials”
Brands are shown in the order each answer named them. The survey took place in the United States on October 21, 2026.
Which SBOM platforms compete with OWASP Dependency-Track?
Share of searches by month for Snyk, Syft, OWASP Dependency-Track, CycloneDX, Anchore. The figures are in the table below the chart.
View monthly share of searches table
| Month | Snyk | Syft | OWASP Dependency-Track | CycloneDX | Anchore | JFrog Xray | Black Duck | Mend | Cybeats | FOSSA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 2025 | 60.7% | 14.9% | 8.1% | 6.6% | 4.4% | 1.9% | 1.5% | 1% | 0.88% | 0.01% |
| Nov 2025 | 56.9% | 17% | 9.3% | 6.2% | 5.1% | 2.2% | 1.4% | 1.1% | 0.83% | 0.01% |
| Dec 2025 | 59.2% | 14.5% | 9.7% | 6.5% | 4.3% | 2.3% | 1.6% | 1.2% | 0.86% | 0.01% |
| Jan 2026 | 56.7% | 17% | 9.3% | 6.2% | 5% | 2.2% | 1.5% | 1.1% | 1% | 0.01% |
| Feb 2026 | 61.3% | 15% | 8.2% | 6.7% | 3.6% | 1.9% | 1.3% | 1% | 0.89% | 0.01% |
| Mar 2026 | 57.7% | 17.3% | 9.4% | 6.3% | 3.4% | 2.3% | 1.7% | 0.95% | 0.95% | <0.01% |
| Apr 2026 | 59.1% | 14.5% | 9.7% | 6.4% | 4.3% | 2.3% | 1.6% | 1.3% | 0.86% | <0.01% |
| May 2026 | 60.1% | 14.7% | 9.8% | 6.6% | 3.6% | 1.9% | 1.4% | 0.99% | 0.87% | <0.01% |
| Jun 2026 | 61% | 12.2% | 10% | 8.2% | 3.6% | 1.9% | 1.5% | 0.89% | 0.73% | 0.01% |
| Jul 2026 | 57% | 13.9% | 11.4% | 7.6% | 4.1% | 1.8% | 2% | 1.2% | 0.83% | 0.01% |
| Aug 2026 | 57.3% | 14% | 9.4% | 9.4% | 4.2% | 1.9% | 1.7% | 1.2% | 1% | 0.01% |
| Sep 2026 | 55.8% | 13.6% | 11.2% | 9.1% | 5% | 1.8% | 1.6% | 0.99% | 0.81% | 0.01% |
| Rank | Brand | Share of searches | Estimated monthly branded searches | vs prior month | Share change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1, held 1st | 55.8% | 49.5K | 0% | -1.5 points | |
| 2, held 2nd | 13.6% | 12.1K | 0% | -0.4 points | |
| 3, moved from 4th to 3rd | 11.2% | 9.9K | +22.2% | +1.8 pointsmoved from 4th to 3rd | |
| 4, moved from 3rd to 4th | 9.1% | 8.1K | 0% | -0.2 pointsmoved from 3rd to 4th | |
| 5, held 5th | 5% | 4.4K | +22.2% | +0.8 points | |
| 6, held 6th | 1.8% | 1.6K | 0% | 0 points | |
| 7, held 7th | 1.6% | 1.4K | 0% | 0 points | |
| 8, held 8th | 0.99% | 880 | -12% | -0.2 points | |
| 9, held 9th | 0.81% | 720 | -18.2% | -0.2 points | |
| 10, held 10th | 0.01% | 10 | 0% | 0 points |
1.
Snyk55.8%
Held 1st. 49.5K estimated branded searches, 0% vs prior month. Share -1.5 points.
2.
Syft13.6%
Held 2nd. 12.1K estimated branded searches, 0% vs prior month. Share -0.4 points.
11.2%
Moved from 4th to 3rd. 9.9K estimated branded searches, +22.2% vs prior month. Share +1.8 points.
9.1%
Moved from 3rd to 4th. 8.1K estimated branded searches, 0% vs prior month. Share -0.2 points.
5.
Anchore5%
Held 5th. 4.4K estimated branded searches, +22.2% vs prior month. Share +0.8 points.
1.8%
Held 6th. 1.6K estimated branded searches, 0% vs prior month. Share 0 points.
1.6%
Held 7th. 1.4K estimated branded searches, 0% vs prior month. Share 0 points.
8.
Mend0.99%
Held 8th. 880 estimated branded searches, -12% vs prior month. Share -0.2 points.
9.
Cybeats0.81%
Held 9th. 720 estimated branded searches, -18.2% vs prior month. Share -0.2 points.
10.
FOSSA0.01%
Held 10th. 10 estimated branded searches, 0% vs prior month. Share 0 points.
Compare popularity between OWASP Dependency-Track and its closest rivals

OWASP Dependency-Track vs Snyk: compare popularity
OWASP Dependency-Track vs Syft: compare popularity
OWASP Dependency-Track vs CycloneDX: compare popularity
OWASP Dependency-Track vs Anchore: compare popularity
OWASP Dependency-Track vs JFrog Xray: compare popularity- Compare OWASP Dependency-Track with any brand
Every comparison with OWASP Dependency-Track
14 comparisons
- Dependabot vs OWASP Dependency-Track
- OWASP Dependency-Track vs Snyk
- OWASP Dependency-Track vs Sonatype
- OWASP Dependency-Track vs Trivy
- OWASP Dependency-Track vs Syft
- CycloneDX vs OWASP Dependency-Track
- OWASP Dependency-Track vs Renovate
- Anchore vs OWASP Dependency-Track
- OWASP Dependency-Check vs OWASP Dependency-Track
- OWASP Dependency-Track vs Socket
- JFrog Xray vs OWASP Dependency-Track
- Black Duck vs OWASP Dependency-Track
- Mend vs OWASP Dependency-Track
- Cybeats vs OWASP Dependency-Track
How has branded search demand for OWASP Dependency-Track changed worldwide over the last 12 months?
3 findings
- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, estimated monthly branded searches for OWASP Dependency-Track worldwide rose from 8.1K to 9.9K.
- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, OWASP Dependency-Track’s share of searches among SBOM platforms worldwide increased from 8.1% to 11.2%.
- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, OWASP Dependency-Track’s share of searches among SBOM platforms worldwide peaked at 11.4% in July 2026 and was lowest at 8.1% in October 2025.
How did search popularity change for SBOM platforms worldwide in September 2026?
6 changes

In September 2026, OWASP Dependency-Track overtook CycloneDX to rank 3rd among SBOM platforms worldwide, with 11.2% of the searches.

In September 2026, Anchore gained share of searches among SBOM platforms worldwide, from 4.2% to 5%.

In September 2026, Snyk lost share of searches among SBOM platforms worldwide, from 57.3% to 55.8%.

Estimated monthly branded searches for CycloneDX worldwide rose 22.7% over 12 measured months, from 6.6K to 8.1K in September 2026.

Estimated monthly branded searches for Syft worldwide fell 18.2% over 12 measured months, from 14.8K to 12.1K in September 2026.

Estimated monthly branded searches for Cybeats worldwide fell 18.2% over 12 measured months, from 880 to 720 in September 2026.
How are OWASP Dependency-Track’s branded searches counted?
1 search term
Brandwave collects information about searches that people make online using OWASP Dependency-Track’s name. When viewed over time, estimated search volumes for this branded term can be used to understand whether interest in the brand is growing, holding steady, or fading.
- dependency track
Who owns OWASP Dependency-Track?
OWASP Dependency-Track is owned by OWASP Foundation. Brandwave does not track any other brands owned by OWASP Foundation.
Do you work for OWASP Dependency-Track? To request corrections or removal please contact us via our support page and we will be happy to assist.
Where does OWASP Dependency-Track compete?
| Competitor set | Rank | Share of searches | Ranking |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dependency scanning tools | 4th of 11 | 6.8% | Show ranking |
| SBOM platforms | 3rd of 10 | 11.2% | Shown above |

Is OWASP Dependency-Track your brand?
Put your own campaigns, spend and outcomes next to this demand line, so you can see which of your marketing lined up with the movements above.