How popular isOWASP Dependency-Track?
In September 2026, people searched for OWASP Dependency-Track by name about 9,900 times worldwide, a 22.2% increase from the previous year. These searches made up 6.8% of all global dependency scanning tool searches, placing OWASP Dependency-Track fourth out of 11 tools. When we asked both ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews about dependency scanning tools, OWASP Dependency-Track appeared in one of the five answers and was the tenth most recommended of the 11.
OWASP Dependency-Track is the fourth most searched of 11 competitors and the tenth most recommended in AI answers.
SnykShare of searches 33.9%Mentioned in 3 of 5 AI answersPlace in AI recommendations 3rd
TrivyShare of searches 27.7%Mentioned in 4 of 5 AI answersPlace in AI recommendations 1st
DependabotShare of searches 15.2%Mentioned in 4 of 5 AI answersPlace in AI recommendations 2nd
OWASP Dependency-TrackShare of searches 6.8%Mentioned in 1 of 5 AI answersPlace in AI recommendations 10th
SonatypeShare of searches 6.8%Mentioned in 2 of 5 AI answersPlace in AI recommendations 6th
Follow OWASP Dependency-Track and get free monthly updates on what changed
By continuing you'll get index updates and occasional product news from Brandwave. Unsubscribe any time. Privacy
Top dependency scanning tools in ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews
In three ChatGPT questions and two Google AI Overviews, OWASP Dependency-Track was mentioned in one out of five: not in any of the three ChatGPT answers, but in one of the two Google AI Overviews. OWASP Dependency-Track is the tenth most recommended of the 11.
Most recommended by AI
Brands get a higher ranking if they are mentioned earlier in the answers.
Trivy1st
Dependabot2nd
Snyk3rd
OWASP Dependency-Check4th
Socket5th
Sonatype6th
Renovate7th
Mend8th
Black Duck9th
OWASP Dependency-Track10th- +1 more
Mentioned by AI
Each dot is one answer, filled in when that answer mentions the brand.
Trivy4 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 2 of 2 Google answers
Dependabot4 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
Snyk3 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
OWASP Dependency-Check3 of 5Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 2 of 2 Google answers
Sonatype2 of 5Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
Renovate2 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
Socket2 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
Black Duck2 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
Mend2 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
OWASP Dependency-Track1 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
See every answer about dependency scanning tools
5 answers
Asked ChatGPT
“Which dependency scanning tool should I use?”
Asked ChatGPT
“What are the best dependency scanning tools?”
Asked ChatGPT
“What's the best dependency scanning tool for a software team?”
Searched Google, AI Overview
“dependency scanning tools”
Searched Google, AI Overview
“open source dependency scanner”
Not named in any answer:
Brands are shown in the order each answer named them. The survey took place in the United States on October 20, 2026.
Which dependency scanning tools compete with OWASP Dependency-Track?
Share of searches by month for Snyk, Trivy, Dependabot, OWASP Dependency-Track, Sonatype, Renovate, OWASP Dependency-Check. The figures are in the table below the chart.
View monthly share of searches table
| Month | Snyk | Trivy | Dependabot | OWASP Dependency-Track | Sonatype | Renovate | OWASP Dependency-Check | Socket | Black Duck | Mend | FOSSA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 2025 | 43.6% | 19.5% | 13% | 5.8% | 7.1% | 3.2% | 4.8% | 1.2% | 1.1% | 0.72% | <0.01% |
| Nov 2025 | 40.2% | 22% | 12% | 6.6% | 8% | 3.6% | 4.4% | 1.3% | 0.98% | 0.81% | <0.01% |
| Dec 2025 | 39.8% | 21.8% | 14.5% | 6.5% | 6.5% | 3.5% | 4.3% | 1.2% | 1.1% | 0.8% | <0.01% |
| Jan 2026 | 39.2% | 21.5% | 14.3% | 6.4% | 7.8% | 3.5% | 4.3% | 1.1% | 1% | 0.79% | <0.01% |
| Feb 2026 | 44% | 19.7% | 13.2% | 5.9% | 7.2% | 3.9% | 3.2% | 1.2% | 0.95% | 0.73% | <0.01% |
| Mar 2026 | 26.3% | 47.7% | 9.6% | 4.3% | 4.3% | 2.9% | 2.3% | 1.4% | 0.76% | 0.43% | <0.01% |
| Apr 2026 | 35.6% | 29.2% | 13.1% | 5.8% | 5.8% | 3.2% | 3.2% | 2.4% | 0.94% | 0.77% | <0.01% |
| May 2026 | 39% | 21.3% | 14.3% | 6.4% | 6.4% | 3.5% | 2.8% | 4.6% | 0.93% | 0.64% | <0.01% |
| Jun 2026 | 39.8% | 21.8% | 14.6% | 6.5% | 6.5% | 3.6% | 3.6% | 2.1% | 0.95% | 0.58% | <0.01% |
| Jul 2026 | 35.4% | 23.7% | 15.9% | 7.1% | 7.1% | 3.9% | 3.1% | 1.9% | 1.3% | 0.72% | <0.01% |
| Aug 2026 | 33.8% | 27.6% | 15.1% | 5.5% | 6.8% | 3.7% | 2.5% | 3.3% | 0.98% | 0.68% | <0.01% |
| Sep 2026 | 33.9% | 27.7% | 15.2% | 6.8% | 6.8% | 3.7% | 2.5% | 2% | 0.98% | 0.6% | <0.01% |
| Rank | Brand | Share of searches | Estimated monthly branded searches | vs prior month | Share change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1, held 1st | 33.9% | 49.5K | 0% | +0.1 points | |
| 2, held 2nd | 27.7% | 40.5K | 0% | +0.1 points | |
| 3, held 3rd | 15.2% | 22.2K | 0% | 0 points | |
| 4, moved from 5th to 4th | 6.8% | 9.9K | +22.2% | +1.2 pointsmoved from 5th to 4th | |
| 5, moved from 4th to 5th | 6.8% | 9.9K | 0% | 0 pointsmoved from 4th to 5th | |
| 6, held 6th | 3.7% | 5.4K | 0% | 0 points | |
| 7, moved from 8th to 7th | 2.5% | 3.6K | 0% | 0 pointsmoved from 8th to 7th | |
| 8, moved from 7th to 8th | 2% | 2.9K | -40.8% | -1.4 pointsmoved from 7th to 8th | |
| 9, held 9th | 0.98% | 1.4K | 0% | 0 points | |
| 10, held 10th | 0.6% | 880 | -12% | -0.1 points | |
| 11, held 11th | <0.01% | 10 | 0% | 0 points |
1.
Snyk33.9%
Held 1st. 49.5K estimated branded searches, 0% vs prior month. Share +0.1 points.
2.
Trivy27.7%
Held 2nd. 40.5K estimated branded searches, 0% vs prior month. Share +0.1 points.
15.2%
Held 3rd. 22.2K estimated branded searches, 0% vs prior month. Share 0 points.
6.8%
Moved from 5th to 4th. 9.9K estimated branded searches, +22.2% vs prior month. Share +1.2 points.
5.
Sonatype6.8%
Moved from 4th to 5th. 9.9K estimated branded searches, 0% vs prior month. Share 0 points.
6.
Renovate3.7%
Held 6th. 5.4K estimated branded searches, 0% vs prior month. Share 0 points.
2.5%
Moved from 8th to 7th. 3.6K estimated branded searches, 0% vs prior month. Share 0 points.
8.
Socket2%
Moved from 7th to 8th. 2.9K estimated branded searches, -40.8% vs prior month. Share -1.4 points.
0.98%
Held 9th. 1.4K estimated branded searches, 0% vs prior month. Share 0 points.
10.
Mend0.6%
Held 10th. 880 estimated branded searches, -12% vs prior month. Share -0.1 points.
11.
FOSSA<0.01%
Held 11th. 10 estimated branded searches, 0% vs prior month. Share 0 points.
Compare popularity between OWASP Dependency-Track and its closest rivals

OWASP Dependency-Track vs Snyk: compare popularity
OWASP Dependency-Track vs Trivy: compare popularity
OWASP Dependency-Track vs Dependabot: compare popularity
OWASP Dependency-Track vs Sonatype: compare popularity
OWASP Dependency-Track vs Renovate: compare popularity- Compare OWASP Dependency-Track with any brand
Every comparison with OWASP Dependency-Track
14 comparisons
- Dependabot vs OWASP Dependency-Track
- OWASP Dependency-Track vs Snyk
- OWASP Dependency-Track vs Sonatype
- OWASP Dependency-Track vs Trivy
- OWASP Dependency-Track vs Syft
- CycloneDX vs OWASP Dependency-Track
- OWASP Dependency-Track vs Renovate
- Anchore vs OWASP Dependency-Track
- OWASP Dependency-Check vs OWASP Dependency-Track
- OWASP Dependency-Track vs Socket
- JFrog Xray vs OWASP Dependency-Track
- Black Duck vs OWASP Dependency-Track
- Mend vs OWASP Dependency-Track
- Cybeats vs OWASP Dependency-Track
How has branded search demand for OWASP Dependency-Track changed worldwide over the last 12 months?
4 findings
- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, estimated monthly branded searches for OWASP Dependency-Track worldwide rose from 8.1K to 9.9K.
- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, OWASP Dependency-Track’s share of searches among dependency scanning tools worldwide increased from 5.8% to 6.8%.
- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, OWASP Dependency-Track’s share of searches among dependency scanning tools worldwide peaked at 7.1% in July 2026 and was lowest at 4.3% in March 2026.
- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, OWASP Dependency-Track rose from 5th to 4th among dependency scanning tools worldwide.
How did search popularity change for dependency scanning tools worldwide in September 2026?
6 changes

In September 2026, OWASP Dependency-Track overtook Sonatype to rank 4th among dependency scanning tools worldwide, with 6.8% of the searches.

In September 2026, Socket lost share of searches among dependency scanning tools worldwide, from 3.3% to 2%.

Trivy’s share of searches among dependency scanning tools worldwide has gained ground for 3 months in a row, from 21.8% to 27.7% in September 2026.

In September 2026, OWASP Dependency-Check rose from 8th to 7th among dependency scanning tools worldwide.

Estimated monthly branded searches for Renovate worldwide rose 22.7% over 12 measured months, from 4.4K to 5.4K in September 2026.

Estimated monthly branded searches for Dependabot worldwide rose 22.7% over 12 measured months, from 18.1K to 22.2K in September 2026.
How are OWASP Dependency-Track’s branded searches counted?
1 search term
Brandwave collects information about searches that people make online using OWASP Dependency-Track’s name. When viewed over time, estimated search volumes for this branded term can be used to understand whether interest in the brand is growing, holding steady, or fading.
- dependency track
Who owns OWASP Dependency-Track?
OWASP Dependency-Track is owned by OWASP Foundation. Brandwave does not track any other brands owned by OWASP Foundation.
Do you work for OWASP Dependency-Track? To request corrections or removal please contact us via our support page and we will be happy to assist.
Where does OWASP Dependency-Track compete?
| Competitor set | Rank | Share of searches | Ranking |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dependency scanning tools | 4th of 11 | 6.8% | Shown above |
| SBOM platforms | 3rd of 10 | 11.2% | Show ranking |

Is OWASP Dependency-Track your brand?
Put your own campaigns, spend and outcomes next to this demand line, so you can see which of your marketing lined up with the movements above.